Rutgers NIL needs you....NOW

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
Here is the thing- we get it, and understand that NIL is now a part of college sports. And I could get behind it if it was actually being used as intended.
If I had a local business that would benefit from the money I would spend as “advertisement” I would 100% give a NIL contract to a player or two.
but, the way it is being handled around all colleges, I just can’t do it.
it may be different if I knew exactly who or what my money was earmarked for. What business is going to be backing the NIl, etc.

I do appreciate that others are doing this though but it isn’t fair to knock anyone that isn’t. If $10, $100, $200 a month is no big deal, then why hasn’t everyone just spent that extra money each year for better seats or just donated more?
As a fan, my $10 for rivals, extra for tickets, parking, food etc is really all that any fan should be expected to do.
It’s going to be used like schiano said to keep our best players so others don’t poach them . If a fan can’t get behind that what our coach is specifically saying we need to do this to be competitive, I don’t know what to say.
 

Frida's Boss

All-American
Oct 10, 2005
10,952
7,738
0
The attitude of some “fans” is ridiculous giving excuses to not support the program . Or saying their done . I get it , NIL sucks . But it’s here and that’s the reality of the situation . True fans understand.
And if you’re really done , please just be done. We don’t need the negative ongoing posts telling us why you’re done. Trust me , Rutgers and big time football will survive without you . Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Did you attend Rutgers? Not meant to be an inflammatory or condescending question. Because I do think the point of view of a non-alumni fan could be different than an alumni. Asking because of your choice of the word fan in your post. Never considered myself a fan of Rutgers as much as an alumni or part of the school.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
Did you attend Rutgers? Not meant to be an inflammatory or condescending question. Because I do think the point of view of a non-alumni fan could be different than an alumni. Asking because of your choice of the word fan in your post. Never considered myself a fan of Rutgers as much as an alumni or part of the school.

Yes.
 

PSU_Nut_rivals17625

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
14,642
2,609
113
The way I see it is I spend about $3K between season tix, parking, tailgates, concessions. I’d rather spend $4200 to watch a title contender than $3K to watch 4-8. and if that means these kids become billionaires i really dont care. All i care about is winning.
Even if magically got every season ticket holder to donate $1,200 you still not going to be a title contender. Likely you are just going to spend $1,200 more for the same product because every other school is doing the same thing. It a losing proposition.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,356
92,280
103
It’s going to be used like schiano said to keep our best players so others don’t poach them . If a fan can’t get behind that what our coach is specifically saying we need to do this to be competitive, I don’t know what to say.
How about poaching and tampering should be regulated and eliminated?
wouldn’t that be easier than asking your fan base for money to keep our good players on the roster
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
How about poaching and tampering should be regulated and eliminated?
wouldn’t that be easier than asking your fan base for money to keep our good players on the roster

Ok so you want system wide reform . I agree the system sucks.

Fans can’t control that . Fans can control NIL donations. For us to complain about the system does us no good . It’s sour grapes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,356
92,280
103
Ok so you want system wide reform . I agree the system sucks.

Fans can’t control that . Fans can control NIL donations. For us to complain about the system does us no good . It’s sour grapes.
Sour grapes?
Really!
Seems to me anyone who realizes bag money and NIL isn’t going away and will completely allow the blue bloods to distance themselves from us….Would acknowledge the one fighting chance we have to retain our best developed players found through superior scouting would be to close free agency.
Because we can’t compete with free agency and poaching, you should admit that, and no level of our fanbase contributing money will change it.
 
Last edited:

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,590
38,353
113
It’s going to be used like schiano said to keep our best players so others don’t poach them . If a fan can’t get behind that what our coach is specifically saying we need to do this to be competitive, I don’t know what to say.
I completely get behind Greg and what he is saying and trying to do. He has no choice. It is now part of his job. And I appreciate anyone that is helping support this.
But it goes against everything I feel a fan should take responsibility for by being a fan. We already do this in a way- when a school or a pro sports team wants more money, they have always raised our ticket prices, etc

To be honest- like a few very long time supportive fans, college sports is having a very tough time even keeping me interested at this point. Between the gambling, portal, NIL - I am losing interest.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
Sour grapes?
Really!
Seems to me anyone who realizes bag money and NIL isn’t going away and will completely allow the blue bloods to distance themselves from us….Would acknowledge the one fighting chance we have to retain our best developed players found through superior scouting would be to close free agency.
Because we can’t compete with free agency and poaching, you should admit that, and no level of our fanbase contributing money will change it.
Yes , it’s sour grapes . You’re just complaining and threatening to not be a fan .
As fans , what is the solution ? Keeping complaining ? Or try to do something to support the team and its NIL efforts ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Sour grapes?
Really!
Seems to me anyone who realizes bag money and NIL isn’t going away and will completely allow the blue bloods to distance themselves from us….Would acknowledge the one fighting chance we have to retain our best developed players found through superior scouting would be to close free agency.
Because we can’t compete with free agency and poaching, you should admit that, and no level of our fanbase contributing money will change it.
This thinking that $ 100 per month is going to change the trajectory with some of the more affluent schools is silly. Unless changes are made to the current system as Zap has reiterated we will still not be at the level needed. We need NJ corporations and some wealthy ( not just the average working person) to organize along with this new Rutgers initiative.. The teams we are in competition for with top flight players take this seriously. Here’s the point: many of us donate yearly but unless forced to most give as little as possible. It has been this way for all the years I have participated. We need to involve the entire community in this goal. I remember seeing how little the “average “ Rutgers donor was able or cared to give yearly. Not a good number.Watch when our media friends start knocking us for even suggesting ways to compete monetarily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,356
92,280
103
Yes , it’s sour grapes . You’re just complaining and threatening to not be a fan .
As fans , what is the solution ? Keeping complaining ? Or try to do something to support the team and its NIL efforts ?
I will always be a Rutgers fan, I will not be a fan off college football in its current form.
I will not support something I don’t believe in
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,767
1,931
113
Maybe we could pool our money and come up with enough to pay Geo Baker to hold a pep rally in this thread and lecture us on how great the new system is for Rutgers?
 

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
Maybe we could pool our money and come up with enough to pay Geo Baker to hold a pep rally in this thread and lecture us on how great the new system is for Rutgers?
Annnndddd……. Still no ideas how to compete in the new landscape, while lecturing former players who gave their heart to this university
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plum Street

LETSGORU91_

All-American
Jan 29, 2017
6,500
7,245
0
Even if magically got every season ticket holder to donate $1,200 you still not going to be a title contender. Likely you are just going to spend $1,200 more for the same product because every other school is doing the same thing. It a losing proposition.
Here's the kicker to what you said. A $1,200 donation will be surpassed by (insert any big name school here) in a heart beat. NIL will not age well IMO and it will be a money grab with the higher/highest bidder winning. Well, it already is a money grab but it will get worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru1869

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
Nobody has any ideas (because there aren't any). Win the lotto is not a financial plan.
I’ve provided multiple
You’ve disregarded them bc “they haven’t worked in the past”

Wheels are in motion w KOR
Large corporations are next on the agenda per GS at TD club meeting

It’s very simple - we either step up $$ wise or continue getting our asses handed to us on a regular basis

incessantly bitching about what hasn’t worked previously while bemoaning the current landscape will lead to the latter

I’d rather take a proactive approach in an effort to change the dynamics - tailgates are fun, but enthusiasm gets dampened when teams repeatedly go in dry
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
I will always be a Rutgers fan, I will not be a fan off college football in its current form.
I will not support something I don’t believe in
I felt this way prior during MBB season when the players from various schools first presented this new NIL plan. Too many uncontrolled aspects and the NCAA ( shills) sat there on the side watching. We are in a premier conference. We have a great area that loves sports but we were not in the position of the top 25 programs in support financially. unless that’s changed? We are not in a strong position . If the power is not controlled where we have the poaching and bag men then you may as well forget about it for now.Wait until NY / NJ media weighs in on this KOR … it is a worthy program but can almost guarantee there will be an outcry of some negativity. At least Murphy seems on board.. for now.
 

JayDogSmooth

All-Conference
Aug 18, 2006
8,096
3,789
0
Here's the kicker to what you said. A $1,200 donation will be surpassed by (insert any big name school here) in a heart beat. NIL will not age well IMO and it will be a money grab with the higher/highest bidder winning. Well, it already is a money grab but it will get worse.
The real kicker is why a guy from a hated rival comes onto the board, deflects blame for multi-year, institutional child rape, then try’s to lecture the fan base of a team he’s directly competing with on why something won’t work, especially when he has no earthly idea what we’re doing to get it going and what the long term ramifications will be from said plan
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Here is the thing- we get it, and understand that NIL is now a part of college sports. And I could get behind it if it was actually being used as intended.
If I had a local business that would benefit from the money I would spend as “advertisement” I would 100% give a NIL contract to a player or two.
but, the way it is being handled around all colleges, I just can’t do it.
it may be different if I knew exactly who or what my money was earmarked for. What business is going to be backing the NIl, etc.

I do appreciate that others are doing this though but it isn’t fair to knock anyone that isn’t. If $10, $100, $200 a month is no big deal, then why hasn’t everyone just spent that extra money each year for better seats or just donated more?
As a fan, my $10 for rivals, extra for tickets, parking, food etc is really all that any fan should be expected to do.
Let me be clear, i will not knock anyone who decides not to participate. Im merely just sharing my view of it and what the potential COULD be. For the first time ever, we as fans have an opportunity to legitimately have an impact on having a perennial title contender on the field. My simpleton view is I’ll spend $4200/yr to watch a contender for titles than $3,000/yr to watch a team that gets steamrolled against any team with a pulse
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Even if magically got every season ticket holder to donate $1,200 you still not going to be a title contender. Likely you are just going to spend $1,200 more for the same product because every other school is doing the same thing. It a losing proposition.
Not true. Other schools dont have $8.4 mill budgets for players. And lets say hypothetically ohio state has a $13 mill budget (their goal). Theyre going to have some top 10 draft picks who demand 7-figures. We can then scoop the measley 4*’s because we can offer them similar or even more money + more on field opportunity.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
How about poaching and tampering should be regulated and eliminated?
wouldn’t that be easier than asking your fan base for money to keep our good players on the roster
Perhaps accepting a NIL deal could be an unbreakable contract that ropes them into that one school. That way, surprise stars cannot be poached.

I think about how we got Brian Leonard and Ray Rice... with BL, Syracuse backed off their offer to his injured brother... but if BL had a lucrative NIL deal all ready to be signed.. maybe he doesn't change schools... and with Rice.. iirc, Cuse fired the coach he liked... but agin.. if the coach changed but an NIL deal had attracted him and would be honored.. maybe he sticks with them. Now.. keeping these two after it became obvious they were stars... that is the legit concern today.

Heck.. we lost players just because they got offers from bigger name programs pre-NIL.. Dahntay Jones, Rosario, Blackshear (now a rookie with the Bills), etc.. without some kind of contractual obligation, this will happen more and more... and, of course, the programs with the money to buy athletes are all for it.
 
Last edited:

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
15,689
19,102
113
Knights of the Raritan
Rutgers NIL initative
I thought the abbreviation was KTR - at least that is what the organizers of the collective use. This is from one of their recent posts "The Knights of The Raritan (KTR) will be hosting our first members event on Tuesday, July 26th, 5-8pm at Tavern on George in NB."
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,767
1,931
113
Let me be clear, i will not knock anyone who decides not to participate. Im merely just sharing my view of it and what the potential COULD be. For the first time ever, we as fans have an opportunity to legitimately have an impact on having a perennial title contender on the field. My simpleton view is I’ll spend $4200/yr to watch a contender for titles than $3,000/yr to watch a team that gets steamrolled against any team with a pulse
Why would you possibly think this is the "first time ever?" You could always donate as much money to the Athletics Department as your heart desired. Hell, you could have (and still could) donate $15 million a year specifically earmarked for hiring Nick Saban; that would have an impact on having a perennial title contender.

The problem was never that the Rutgers fanbase (administration, faculty, staff, students, alumni, local media, politicians) didn't have an "opportunity" to participate. The problem has always been that the Rutgers fanbase did not (and does not) have enough collective desire to participate in a meaningful way.
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Why would you possibly think this is the "first time ever?" You could always donate as much money to the Athletics Department as your heart desired. Hell, you could have (and still could) donate $15 million a year specifically earmarked for hiring Nick Saban; that would have an impact on having a perennial title contender.

The problem was never that the Rutgers fanbase (administration, faculty, staff, students, alumni, local media, politicians) didn't have an "opportunity" to participate. The problem has always been that the Rutgers fanbase did not (and does not) have enough collective desire to participate in a meaningful way.
Im gonna go out on a limb and say money in kids pockets drives them to a school more than a new piece of steel
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBlackout7

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
Nobody in the NFL asks for donations to pay player salaries; the money comes from TV and ticket/merchandise revenue. College football has ticket and TV revenue yet demands ever-larger amounts of donations, too--allegedly non-profit organizations. The conferences are insanely lopsided in their strength and payouts and can change without warning; teams get to fill out much of their own schedules; trips to bowl games are often a money-losing proposition for the schools that go. It's the worst of everything for a sports league. There is a reason no other sports league operates this way.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Think about teams like Miami under Mario Cristobal. Does anyone not believe Miami’s bagmen won’t be still active ? Now insert teams such as A&M ,Texas, The OSU, PSU, Notre Dame Michigan , OKie State and Oklahoma, , NC, Duke just to name a few. There are perhaps another 20-30 who will circumvent the system anyway they can. Not saying that’s wrong by the way, I just would prefer we were not over stating this $$$$$ aspect.,Imagine getting possible 100mil per year from TV and still sweating it out.
 

Jtung230

Heisman
Jun 30, 2005
19,262
12,398
82
Nobody in the NFL asks for donations to pay player salaries; the money comes from TV and ticket/merchandise revenue. College football has ticket and TV revenue yet demands ever-larger amounts of donations, too--allegedly non-profit organizations. The conferences are insanely lopsided in their strength and payouts and can change without warning; teams get to fill out much of their own schedules; trips to bowl games are often a money-losing proposition for the schools that go. It's the worst of everything for a sports league. There is a reason no other sports league operates this way.
NFL players don’t ask for donations because they get paid. Players do go to the highest bidder.
 

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
Even if magically got every season ticket holder to donate $1,200 you still not going to be a title contender. Likely you are just going to spend $1,200 more for the same product because every other school is doing the same thing. It a losing proposition.
So your solution is to do nothing, have consistently poor recruiting classes and fall to the bottom of the B1G every year?

What a loser attitude because you’re too cheap at the end of the day.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
If this was now considered officially “ football’s minor leagues” would you continue to support these teams as before? Would you care and watch like it’s the NFL? I’d rather watch Pop Warner until they began paying those kids. Never had a problem with compensation for these athletes but now I feel many around the country are saying somebody needs to reign this in before it crashes to earth.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
NFL players don’t ask for donations because they get paid. Players do go to the highest bidder.
Not at first they don't. NFL DRAFT sound familiar? They have that to promote parity.. fairness... same with salary caps. The day will soon come where a college freshman made more as a freshman than the deal he gets in the NFL.. where he might evn go undrafted.

Yes.. I think the vast majority of programs should split away from those paying riddiculous NIL money. Let them play eachother and call themselves National Champions. Going along with this ridiculous PAY TO WIN plan is not in the best interests of the majority of programs or athletes or college sports as a whole. When Rutgers cut some olympic sports to help limit athletic spending there was an outcry... that is going to continue as donors shift from donating to the school to donating to athletes from a specific sport. There are so many perfectly forseeable bad outcomes from this movement that it should be opposed strongly and collectively now. But it won't be. And that's sad.
 
Last edited:

RUBlackout7

All-Conference
Apr 10, 2021
1,535
2,097
0
It is one thing to donate money to help build an athletic facility on campus or fund a scholarship, but why would anybody actually be advocating that a fan donate directly to a fund that will help make a player and his family millionaires? Not only that, but the player is not even under contract to play for you for x amount of years, he can take your money and then transfer to another university and take their money next year. Maybe it is just me, but I wasn't put on this planet to work and take money out of my own family's pocket to give to an 18-22 year old so he can buy a Mercedes, fancy clothes, plenty of bling and whatever other material items just so on a fall Saturday I can have bragging rights over another school's football fans for a year. Makes no sense to me.
What’s the difference between donating for a building that only players will use versus donating to the player directly? I don’t understand this logic at all. People are fine to donate to coaches bloated salaries, but god forbid kids who actually are doing all the work get a slice.

Is it jealousy or what? Can’t wrap my head around the stance of the “never NIL” folks in here.

It’s a very simple logic tree…. Do you want Rutgers to be competitive and attract/retain good players? If yes, the best and most direct way to do that is donate to NIL. End of story.