Rutgers-Michigan Game Thread

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,627
4,966
113
Pike obviously knows a ton more than me hence why id be curious to here his take on what his thought process is on playing kiss
For starters, his defense was OK tonight and certainly better than Geo's defense. If I was going to question anyone playing tonight it would be Geo, who was absolutely awful, and for the second consecutive game we've got Doorson covering a guy who killed us from three.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KnightTerrors

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
Good effort against a probable sweet 16 or maybe elite 8 team. Little things you could pick on (missed chippies, a few turnovers, a couple of ref's calls), but they fought the whole way. Props to Shaq D, and EO in particular. No problems with Coach's decisions on playing time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KnightTerrors

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
22,472
26,918
88
Did anyone see Young put his arm around Geo when he got fouled out and probably told him to keep his head up or probably something like that?

He’s not playing this season, but he definitely seems like he is a great teammate. He’ll be a great leader in upcoming years. I wouldn’t be surprised

Been saying this all year. Seems like a GREAT teammate and leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
248,853
178,367
113
I don't think so but that's fine. Tell me what he's better at.

For starters leadership...secondly experience.
Third and most important his role is entirely different than Caleb who gets to play without any pressure to do about 5 different things

Caleb is a role player right now. He is doing that role solidly enough but careful when you project a greater role from

You were the dame poster who also threw Mathis under the bus after 2 bad games

Relax and stop projecting lineups for next year
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,245
12,523
113
The difference in this game was that Michigan had scorers at every position while Rutgers was limited to inside scoring primarily from Eugene with 21 points.At the same time Rutgers must have missed at least 7 shots around the basket which was critical because the Michigan lead was always around 10 points.It was a exciting night with a sellout crowd supporting the team, Bottom line the Rutgers offense lacks having even one consistent outside shooter which means the team simply won't score enough points to match baskets against a outstanding coached Michigan team.
 

RUsince52

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2016
6,821
2,046
0
We were allergic to the backboard tonight. We must have missed 8 shots from within six feet because we didn’t use the backboard.
Our big guys only use it on almost uncontested layups or put backs. But the bigger issue is that they really don't have a normal shot from 6-7 feet. Can't shoot or fake on the move. It's probably the same in practice too.
 
Last edited:

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,116
8,407
113
The difference in this game was that Michigan had scorers at every position while Rutgers was limited to inside scoring primarily from Eugene with 21 points.At the same time Rutgers must have missed at least 7 shots around the basket which was critical because the Michigan lead was always around 10 points.It was a exciting night with a sellout crowd supporting the team, Bottom line the Rutgers offense lacks having even one consistent outside shooter which means the team simply won't score enough points to match baskets against a outstanding coached Michigan team.
Yep we don't have shooters. It's no coincidence we're last in the big ten in free throw percentage. Our inside game is pretty good though as we had a huge chunk of points in the paint. If you just add 1 or 2 shooters we win these games
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Been saying this all year. Seems like a GREAT teammate and leader.
Which is not typically what you think of when someone transfers as a 4 star. Hard to not fantasize about what this team looks like with PM and Young