Rutgers as NCAA bubble team

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
We are literally 22 months removed from being a team that could and did beat anyone and belonged in any conversation about getting to a Final 4 and winning a National Championship. That team lacked one extra body and no injuries from potentially being a Top 10 team. It was all defense.
First, I want to point out that my commentary was predicated on IF we remain a 120ish team. I personally don't think that will happen and I think the team will be good by February. Whether we will have done too much damage to our resume by that point is an open question.

That said, the team you're referring to missed the tournament entirely. You don't really get any credit for looking good in January and losing one player who was playing 25 mpg is not a sufficient excuse for flaming out in such epic fashion.

Yes, we were #12 in Bart at the high point of that season (immediately after the Michigan State win) and yes, that was predicated entirely on defense. Our adjusted defensive efficiency to that point was 84.9 (#2) and we were #150 in offense.

BUT,
- An 84.9 defensive rating, if maintained for an entire season, would be the #5 defense ever in the Kenpom era (behind 2009 Memphis 84.2, 2013 Louisville 84.8, 2015 Kentucky 84.4, 2019 Texas Tech 84.1). I do not think achieving that level of defense is a sustainable plan, and surely improving on the #150 offense is far, far, far lower hanging fruit.
- While that team was playing great defense at the time, teams had also shot 28.9% from three against us that season. While a little bit of that was probably attributable to our defense, a lot of it was simply good luck. There was bound to be some regression to the mean there.

We just aren't going to win a championship, or make a final four, being #150 on either side of the court. As far as I can tell the worst any national championship winner has been on either offense or defense is 2014 UConn with the #39 offense. And even that is kind of a fluke imo because they were #15 overall, the only Kenpom era champion outside of the top 10.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
14,716
15,580
113
This was always going to a be an around the bubble type year. Way too many new pieces combined with youthful talent that the staff has never had before. It will take a bit for Pike to settle on rotations. We'll have a guy or two that will find they aren't this level when they play Alabama and that will help the rotation.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
First, I want to point out that my commentary was predicated on IF we remain a 120ish team. I personally don't think that will happen and I think the team will be good by February. Whether we will have done too much damage to our resume by that point is an open question.

That said, the team you're referring to missed the tournament entirely. You don't really get any credit for looking good in January and losing one player who was playing 25 mpg is not a sufficient excuse for flaming out in such epic fashion.

Yes, we were #12 in Bart at the high point of that season (immediately after the Michigan State win) and yes, that was predicated entirely on defense. Our adjusted defensive efficiency to that point was 84.9 (#2) and we were #150 in offense.

BUT,
- An 84.9 defensive rating, if maintained for an entire season, would be the #5 defense ever in the Kenpom era (behind 2009 Memphis 84.2, 2013 Louisville 84.8, 2015 Kentucky 84.4, 2019 Texas Tech 84.1). I do not think achieving that level of defense is a sustainable plan, and surely improving on the #150 offense is far, far, far lower hanging fruit.
- While that team was playing great defense at the time, teams had also shot 28.9% from three against us that season. While a little bit of that was probably attributable to our defense, a lot of it was simply good luck. There was bound to be some regression to the mean there.

We just aren't going to win a championship, or make a final four, being #150 on either side of the court. As far as I can tell the worst any national championship winner has been on either offense or defense is 2014 UConn with the #39 offense. And even that is kind of a fluke imo because they were #15 overall, the only Kenpom era champion outside of the top 10.
let's not forget Caleb and Paul were out early and we werent healthy until 12/3.

That year SD State made it to the final...a team that won with defense
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
let's not forget Caleb and Paul were out early and we werent healthy until 12/3.

That year SD State made it to the final...a team that won with defense
They did. They had the #75 offense which is a big step up from #150.

Separately, and semi-related, they were a 5 seed which is not really what I would consider a championship contender generally (while granting that anyone can get hot once they're in the field).
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
They did. They had the #75 offense which is a big step up from #150.

Separately, and semi-related, they were a 5 seed which is not really what I would consider a championship contender generally (while granting that anyone can get hot once they're in the field).
Sooooo.........

The day before Mag was hurt....what do you think the Vegas odds would have been for RU to win it all?

Is 35 to 1 reasonable to guess?
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
We were 11 to 1 to be in the F4 according to bart.....Did bart take in to consideration Caleb and Paul's injuries that had them out 1st 1/4 of the season. The team was thin on the rotation (which would have been the achilles heel and proved to be the case when Mag went down)
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
This is a pretty good stretch

 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
We were 11 to 1 to be in the F4 according to bart.....Did bart take in to consideration Caleb and Paul's injuries that had them out 1st 1/4 of the season. The team was thin on the rotation (which would have been the achilles heel and proved to be the case when Mag went down)
No, but he also didn't account for our lack of depth (and again he had us #12 overall which was certainly higher than consensus opinion) so I think he was being at least fair to us if not overestimating our chances.

This is a pretty good stretch

I have no data on this but it is my feeling that Pike's teams have been very streaky. The 2019-20 team, 2020-21 team, 2021-22 team, 2022-23 team all had stretches where they looked like top 10 teams as well as stretches where they looked absolutely awful (well 2019-20 maybe not but still stretches where they didn't look very good).
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
no doubt....not sure if it is ant more streaky than a 35ish ranked team would be with schedule like us.

2 years ago I had a ton of concerns about our team hitting a wall because everyone was playing balls to wall for 37 minutes. That year Paul fell off a cliff physically and mentally at the end of the year. I think playing with effort will lead to that. Paul was Magic or Oscar Robertson for 5 games that year. By the end of the year was tripping people and practically crying on the court and has his starting PG spot stripped and given to Derek
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,871
25,554
113
I just want to calm the nerves of fans already worried about being on the wrong side of the bubble for the big dance.

If we are on the bubble, we'll be the first of the bubble teams the committee puts in. They'll find a suitable seed and start comparing the other bubble clubs.

There is no way it's keeping Ace and Dylan out of the tournament. Two high NBA lottery picks provide too much interest.

The only way we don't get in is if we 💩 the bed big-time during the course of the season. I don't see that happening.
We better win 20 plus games
 

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,294
15,999
73
Do you expect a metamorphosis from a team that can’t rebound or play D?
Yes ..to an extent

Our defense is not going to be elite …but a chunk of our defensive issues is mental recognition of the timing of rotations and switching and recognizing screens

Guys like Dylan and ace will get over those screens more in February than. Ke by playing. It’s not athleticsm , it’s recognition that takes sone time

Same with Somerville …who has the foot speed and agility to get to the spot …but needs to learn to recognize it

This so reminds me of haroer and Mathis and Myles first year defense…in 2018-2019. We were a defensive train wreck in December losing some bad OOC in fordham , seton hall wih bad defense …and by January , it started to click on defense

I am concerned about what martini , hayes and Ogobke Dan do because of foot soeed and agility issues can do on man defense …but I think ace , Dylan , lathan , derkack will be better as the year goes on and the grasp the defensive lapses

Untik then …we need to outscore sone teams and not get too many losses …..
 

hinson32

All-American
Jul 29, 2005
7,789
5,946
57
Well, by “hot” I don’t mean like a firing is imminent. But what I do mean is that we would be on a three year run of declining and subpar results and it would be reasonable for people to start asking questions and giving him a little bit of a shorter leash to turn it around.

From 2017-2021 I think he did well as anyone could reasonably have expected. A+ and anyone criticizing (overall, not specific aspects; I’m not saying he was perfect) at that point was way off base.

But since that point things have been less good, and we are at a point now where he no longer gets a pass because he is rebuilding a horrible program. It’s year 9. This is HIS program now and he just brought in a top top top class.

If he is going to take the next step he needs to be able to win with this kind of player. He needs to be able to put together teams that can actually score some points while still playing defense at a high level. Defense is just as important as offense, and you can be pretty good by being elite at one of them, but at some point you hit the wall of diminishing returns and need to become good on the other side of the ball as well.
Subpar recruits? He landed the best class in RU history.
 

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,912
6,751
113
I just want to calm the nerves of fans already worried about being on the wrong side of the bubble for the big dance.

If we are on the bubble, we'll be the first of the bubble teams the committee puts in. They'll find a suitable seed and start comparing the other bubble clubs.

There is no way it's keeping Ace and Dylan out of the tournament. Two high NBA lottery picks provide too much interest.

The only way we don't get in is if we 💩 the bed big-time during the course of the season. I don't see that happening.
If we end up being a bubble team, Pikiell's seat better be hot with a new AD coming in. With this much talent and not making the NCAA coaching would be a real question mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freddy Stubbs