Rutgers finally develops a team with tons of veteran pieces who are worth playing 30+ minutes per game and all anyone can wonder is why aren't the freshmen playing more.
Great reply. They are not guards. Mag might develop better dribbling and break down people as he matures. But that should not concern you because Jones will be able to break down and shoot over most defenders at an accurate efficient rate plus Miller will likely be able to break you down. No one is as fast as Jacob Young so don’t expect that level of breakdown but plenty accurate. Plus they are recruiting guards now for 2022 that will also break down defenders and can shoot. I think your worries are unnecessary. We have fallen in love with Geo, and Jacob and Montez and Ron and we will fall in love with the next group. Go listen to Matt Painter chat from yesterday prior to our game on the Round Table if you want to know what another really good Big 10 coach thinks about Pike and our players. Respect and admiration.Well we didn't recruit any guards in that class, so of course that's not there. Not that we know what Mag or anyone else is going to turn into... he's not going to be an off-the-dribble guy but he could become a dependable wing.
Hawk won’t mention Michigan in his many posts downplaying the impact of freshmen in the conference.Freshman center at Michigan is a starter. Just to add to the list.
Pike has said that this was his best class ever....give them time.
Rutgers finally develops a team with tons of veteran pieces who are worth playing 30+ minutes per game and all anyone can wonder is why aren't the freshmen playing more.
Never said a lot of freshman were getting significant minutes, as you suggest only reasonably elite level or teams that have to play frosh are using them significantly basically our frosh, once league play began are pretty much riding the pines, its the difference between no minutes and three or four here and there, without cliff we are into a 6-7 man rotationOther freshman in the league are getting minutes....I can count 4 to 5 players on 14 teams getting reasonable minutes, 2 at Illinois are Top 50 players, 1 at NW is a Top 150 kid and probably 1 or 2 on Nebraska...the other 1 is the 7'4" kid who is starting for Purdue, who replaced the 5th year grad transfer Matt Haarms.....Haarms transferred to BYU into keeping a starting role.
If you have the list of players as freshman logging big minutes, provide their data.
It's a double edge sword....you really should only have a 9 man rotation on a good team...there are some exceptions but in general, teams have 8 to 9.
If you always have 2 to 3 recruits per class and those 2 to 3 new recruits always immediately plug into your rotation or lineup, it means you have a bad roster or a bad team.
I think the original poster is looking for a situation where a Paul Mulcahy type of player plugs into a lineup at 20 minutes a game as a freshman for each recruiting class and if that doesn't happen, the class is a non-factor.
Even if that was the case, teams like Minnesota have refilled a roster with transfers and 2 Top 150 kids and instead of finishing 11th or 12th, they're probably going to land in the NCAA tournament. So even if the 2020 class doesn't provide immediate results with starters, it doesn't mean they can't be a starter in 2 years as a junior, while the 2021 class or a potential transfer in, lands on the roster.
starters Omoruyi, Doorson, Thiam, Baker, and Kiss.
Enjoy this year since winter is coming after that.
Reiber and Palmquist looked like perfectly acceptable Big Ten rotation pieces today. Mag would too, if healthy, I believe.
Here are the stats for our then-freshman class in November and December of 2018-2019. There were 7 games against low- and mid-majors (6-1), and 5 games against power conference teams (1-4), for a 7-5 record heading into January that season.
vs. FDU (90-55 win):
Mathis - 21 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 17 minutes, 15 points
McConnell - 8 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP
vs. Drexel (95-66 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 22 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 10 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP
vs. St. John's (65-84 loss):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 6 points
Harper - 23 minutes, 8 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 17 minutes, 6 points, 7 rebounds
vs. Eastern Michigan (63-36 win):
Mathis - 9 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 20 minutes, 4 points
McConnell - 6 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 19 minutes, 2 points, 7 rebounds
vs. BU (54-44 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 2 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 15 minutes, 0 points, 5 rebounds
vs. Miami, FL (57-54 win):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 4 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 6 points
McConnell - 1 minute, 0 points
Johnson - 12 minutes, 0 points, 2 rebounds
vs. MSU (67-78 loss):
Mathis - 20 minutes, 5 points
Harper - 13 minutes, 3 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 7 points
Johnson - 11 minutes, 4 points, 4 rebounds
vs. Wisky (64-69 loss):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 14 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 6 minutes, 0 points, 1 rebound
vs. Fordham (70-78 loss) -- UGH, still seeing Nick Honor in my nightmares!
Mathis - 25 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 10 points
McConnell - 3 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 3 minutes, 2 points, 1 rebound
vs. SHU (66-72 loss):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 27 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 9 minutes, 4 points
Johnson - 14 minutes, 0 points, 9 rebounds
vs. Columbia (68-65 win in OT):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 2 points (he started)
Harper - 8 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 25 minutes, 8 points
Johnson - 16 minutes, 3 points, 4 rebounds
vs. Maine (70-55 win):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 7 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 24 minutes, 14 points
Johnson - 21 minutes, 10 points, 10 rebounds
Another notable point here - other than Mathis starting the last four games, these four freshman, plus seldomly-used sophomore Doucoure and JUCO transfer Shaq Carter, were basically the entire bench, behind starters Omoruyi, Doorson, Thiam, Baker, and Kiss. So they HAD to play, Pike had no choice.
Did a few of them flash at times? Yes, but mostly against the easier teams. And although I didn't list the shooting percentages here, trust me when I tell you that the FG%s were UGLY, especially for Harper. Fast forward to this season, and all of these players have improved SIGNIFICANTLY from those first 12 games of their freshman year.
Does this mean that the current crop of freshmen WILL improve and be productive? No. But it surely suggests that Pike knows how to develop his young guys, and that we should hold off on any final opinions until they have a chance to actually play.
Does anyone have insight on the free throw ability of these guys? Hard to find any data and the 2020 samples are too small. Would be nice to blend in some good free throw shooters off the bench.
I actually think Reiber is going to be excellent. We finally have some veteran leadership and it’s been hard to mess with success when these big 10 teams are all good. Pike had to play his best guys. Be patient and I think you’ll see these freshman contribute. They won’t get the playing time as quickly but it will happen.The only one I am not sold on is Reiber. Palmquist hasn't showed it yet, but that kid has game. Once he gets comfortable, he is going to look like one of those Wisconsin players who drains 3's constantly.