RU Hoops Recruiting

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,423
7,684
113
Well we didn't recruit any guards in that class, so of course that's not there. Not that we know what Mag or anyone else is going to turn into... he's not going to be an off-the-dribble guy but he could become a dependable wing.
Great reply. They are not guards. Mag might develop better dribbling and break down people as he matures. But that should not concern you because Jones will be able to break down and shoot over most defenders at an accurate efficient rate plus Miller will likely be able to break you down. No one is as fast as Jacob Young so don’t expect that level of breakdown but plenty accurate. Plus they are recruiting guards now for 2022 that will also break down defenders and can shoot. I think your worries are unnecessary. We have fallen in love with Geo, and Jacob and Montez and Ron and we will fall in love with the next group. Go listen to Matt Painter chat from yesterday prior to our game on the Round Table if you want to know what another really good Big 10 coach thinks about Pike and our players. Respect and admiration.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
22,347
26,641
88
Here are the stats for our then-freshman class in November and December of 2018-2019. There were 7 games against low- and mid-majors (6-1), and 5 games against power conference teams (1-4), for a 7-5 record heading into January that season.

vs. FDU (90-55 win):
Mathis - 21 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 17 minutes, 15 points
McConnell - 8 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP

vs. Drexel (95-66 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 22 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 10 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP

vs. St. John's (65-84 loss):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 6 points
Harper - 23 minutes, 8 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 17 minutes, 6 points, 7 rebounds

vs. Eastern Michigan (63-36 win):
Mathis - 9 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 20 minutes, 4 points
McConnell - 6 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 19 minutes, 2 points, 7 rebounds

vs. BU (54-44 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 2 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 15 minutes, 0 points, 5 rebounds

vs. Miami, FL (57-54 win):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 4 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 6 points
McConnell - 1 minute, 0 points
Johnson - 12 minutes, 0 points, 2 rebounds

vs. MSU (67-78 loss):
Mathis - 20 minutes, 5 points
Harper - 13 minutes, 3 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 7 points
Johnson - 11 minutes, 4 points, 4 rebounds

vs. Wisky (64-69 loss):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 14 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 6 minutes, 0 points, 1 rebound

vs. Fordham (70-78 loss) -- UGH, still seeing Nick Honor in my nightmares!
Mathis - 25 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 10 points
McConnell - 3 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 3 minutes, 2 points, 1 rebound

vs. SHU (66-72 loss):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 27 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 9 minutes, 4 points
Johnson - 14 minutes, 0 points, 9 rebounds

vs. Columbia (68-65 win in OT):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 2 points (he started)
Harper - 8 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 25 minutes, 8 points
Johnson - 16 minutes, 3 points, 4 rebounds

vs. Maine (70-55 win):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 7 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 24 minutes, 14 points
Johnson - 21 minutes, 10 points, 10 rebounds

Another notable point here - other than Mathis starting the last four games, these four freshman, plus seldomly-used sophomore Doucoure and JUCO transfer Shaq Carter, were basically the entire bench, behind starters Omoruyi, Doorson, Thiam, Baker, and Kiss. So they HAD to play, Pike had no choice.

Did a few of them flash at times? Yes, but mostly against the easier teams. And although I didn't list the shooting percentages here, trust me when I tell you that the FG%s were UGLY, especially for Harper. Fast forward to this season, and all of these players have improved SIGNIFICANTLY from those first 12 games of their freshman year.

Does this mean that the current crop of freshmen WILL improve and be productive? No. But it surely suggests that Pike knows how to develop his young guys, and that we should hold off on any final opinions until they have a chance to actually play.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,430
148,479
113
Pike has said that this was his best class ever....give them time.

The only one I am not sold on is Reiber. Palmquist hasn't showed it yet, but that kid has game. Once he gets comfortable, he is going to look like one of those Wisconsin players who drains 3's constantly.
 

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,526
9,832
113
Rutgers finally develops a team with tons of veteran pieces who are worth playing 30+ minutes per game and all anyone can wonder is why aren't the freshmen playing more.

Exactly. The freshman are currently stuck behind players on a top 20 team. None of the vets on the roster were in that same situation, nor were they subjected to an extremely shortened OOC situation as freshman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carmenst

jakeknight

Senior
Jan 29, 2009
1,273
967
0
Other freshman in the league are getting minutes....I can count 4 to 5 players on 14 teams getting reasonable minutes, 2 at Illinois are Top 50 players, 1 at NW is a Top 150 kid and probably 1 or 2 on Nebraska...the other 1 is the 7'4" kid who is starting for Purdue, who replaced the 5th year grad transfer Matt Haarms.....Haarms transferred to BYU into keeping a starting role.

If you have the list of players as freshman logging big minutes, provide their data.

It's a double edge sword....you really should only have a 9 man rotation on a good team...there are some exceptions but in general, teams have 8 to 9.

If you always have 2 to 3 recruits per class and those 2 to 3 new recruits always immediately plug into your rotation or lineup, it means you have a bad roster or a bad team.

I think the original poster is looking for a situation where a Paul Mulcahy type of player plugs into a lineup at 20 minutes a game as a freshman for each recruiting class and if that doesn't happen, the class is a non-factor.

Even if that was the case, teams like Minnesota have refilled a roster with transfers and 2 Top 150 kids and instead of finishing 11th or 12th, they're probably going to land in the NCAA tournament. So even if the 2020 class doesn't provide immediate results with starters, it doesn't mean they can't be a starter in 2 years as a junior, while the 2021 class or a potential transfer in, lands on the roster.
Never said a lot of freshman were getting significant minutes, as you suggest only reasonably elite level or teams that have to play frosh are using them significantly basically our frosh, once league play began are pretty much riding the pines, its the difference between no minutes and three or four here and there, without cliff we are into a 6-7 man rotation
 

Perricone7

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2015
1,492
2,107
113
Feel like context is crucial here. First, Mag is injured. I thought he looked fine in the non-conference games. Sort of a Mathis-lite. Second, my guess is staff intended to redshirt Reiber. Palmquist scares me a bit. The fact that he is like 21 already and was on the team in the spring yet still isn't getting playing time is a red flag.
 

RUKen

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2003
1,477
2,234
0
Also need to look at who is coming in next year which is very impressive. We will likely pick up some impressive players in 22 as well. I was impressed with what I saw today from our freshman.
 

RURabid

Junior
Jul 31, 2001
1,267
298
83
Reiber and Palmquist looked like perfectly acceptable Big Ten rotation pieces today. Mag would too, if healthy, I believe.

Does anyone have insight on the free throw ability of these guys? Hard to find any data and the 2020 samples are too small. Would be nice to blend in some good free throw shooters off the bench.
 

Woody522

Junior
Dec 7, 2013
462
329
0
Here are the stats for our then-freshman class in November and December of 2018-2019. There were 7 games against low- and mid-majors (6-1), and 5 games against power conference teams (1-4), for a 7-5 record heading into January that season.

vs. FDU (90-55 win):
Mathis - 21 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 17 minutes, 15 points
McConnell - 8 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP

vs. Drexel (95-66 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 10 points
Harper - 22 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 10 minutes, 1 point
Johnson - DNP

vs. St. John's (65-84 loss):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 6 points
Harper - 23 minutes, 8 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 17 minutes, 6 points, 7 rebounds

vs. Eastern Michigan (63-36 win):
Mathis - 9 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 20 minutes, 4 points
McConnell - 6 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 19 minutes, 2 points, 7 rebounds

vs. BU (54-44 win):
Mathis - 16 minutes, 2 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 5 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 15 minutes, 0 points, 5 rebounds

vs. Miami, FL (57-54 win):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 4 points
Harper - 19 minutes, 6 points
McConnell - 1 minute, 0 points
Johnson - 12 minutes, 0 points, 2 rebounds

vs. MSU (67-78 loss):
Mathis - 20 minutes, 5 points
Harper - 13 minutes, 3 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 7 points
Johnson - 11 minutes, 4 points, 4 rebounds

vs. Wisky (64-69 loss):
Mathis - 13 minutes, 0 points
Harper - 14 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 11 minutes, 2 points
Johnson - 6 minutes, 0 points, 1 rebound

vs. Fordham (70-78 loss) -- UGH, still seeing Nick Honor in my nightmares!
Mathis - 25 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 10 points
McConnell - 3 minutes, 0 points
Johnson - 3 minutes, 2 points, 1 rebound

vs. SHU (66-72 loss):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 8 points (he started)
Harper - 27 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 9 minutes, 4 points
Johnson - 14 minutes, 0 points, 9 rebounds

vs. Columbia (68-65 win in OT):
Mathis - 14 minutes, 2 points (he started)
Harper - 8 minutes, 0 points
McConnell - 25 minutes, 8 points
Johnson - 16 minutes, 3 points, 4 rebounds

vs. Maine (70-55 win):
Mathis - 19 minutes, 7 points (he started)
Harper - 17 minutes, 5 points
McConnell - 24 minutes, 14 points
Johnson - 21 minutes, 10 points, 10 rebounds

Another notable point here - other than Mathis starting the last four games, these four freshman, plus seldomly-used sophomore Doucoure and JUCO transfer Shaq Carter, were basically the entire bench, behind starters Omoruyi, Doorson, Thiam, Baker, and Kiss. So they HAD to play, Pike had no choice.

Did a few of them flash at times? Yes, but mostly against the easier teams. And although I didn't list the shooting percentages here, trust me when I tell you that the FG%s were UGLY, especially for Harper. Fast forward to this season, and all of these players have improved SIGNIFICANTLY from those first 12 games of their freshman year.

Does this mean that the current crop of freshmen WILL improve and be productive? No. But it surely suggests that Pike knows how to develop his young guys, and that we should hold off on any final opinions until they have a chance to actually play.

Omg lol that brings back memories.

Doorson took 4 years to average like 5ppg.
Thiam so great at shooting until it counted.
Kiss, welll lol.
EO was good
 

Woody522

Junior
Dec 7, 2013
462
329
0
Does anyone have insight on the free throw ability of these guys? Hard to find any data and the 2020 samples are too small. Would be nice to blend in some good free throw shooters off the bench.

Reiber seems like he can shoot 70+ %

No clue on Mag
 

bowlgoal

Heisman
Jul 20, 2004
12,194
11,407
93
The only one I am not sold on is Reiber. Palmquist hasn't showed it yet, but that kid has game. Once he gets comfortable, he is going to look like one of those Wisconsin players who drains 3's constantly.
I actually think Reiber is going to be excellent. We finally have some veteran leadership and it’s been hard to mess with success when these big 10 teams are all good. Pike had to play his best guys. Be patient and I think you’ll see these freshman contribute. They won’t get the playing time as quickly but it will happen.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,366
38,113
113
I guess the couple of questions would be, why wouldn't Go and Young come back. I am not sure they would be drafted but they may have opportunities in Europe. Would coming back an extra year possible get them closer to an NBA career? Asking seriously as I am by no means an expert in basketball. And with Harper...he may be proving to be an NBA player with his play and bloodlines, but would he leave early or would he come back another year too?
As for the younger guys- Cliff looks like with another 10-20lbs- could be a complete stud inside. Mulcahy is playing pretty well and could really develop. I havent really seen the other young guys but Reiber has been playing better.
Hoping at least one of Young/Geo come back if not both, Harper stays for a Sr season. And that gives us another year to develop the younger players.

All I know- the next two years will at least be a lot of fun...If we get and stay healthy for March- this could be one heck of a ride...