RU +2

Rutgers25

All-American
Jul 29, 2001
7,759
6,173
83
They’re not. I also don’t think we are a good as some people think. We should win this one, however. Put fans in the arena, and I’m not so sure.

agree wholeheartedly. Our team is very capable of going into long funks offensively. Need Geo back healthy and fully back integrated into the team for me to feel real good this year.
 

RutgersRaRa

Heisman
Mar 21, 2011
19,087
31,437
113
It’s an away game in an unpredictable season, and we’re without Geo and Caleb. Our freshmen are still works in progress, so the rotation isn’t as deep as it was last year. Cliff brings defense to the table and helps keep Myles fresh, but our depth is an issue. If Palmquist gets his shots to fall (and I think he eventually will—his stroke improved last game even though none went in), he can add minutes.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,221
12,484
113
The odds are probably based on Rutgers poor road record last season and Baker might not play.
 

toby83

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2014
4,095
3,822
0
nothing wrong with the line

road game, and missing a top player

they still have 5 star guys you know

they will play D

thinking our interior makes the difference, interior D plus some 2nd chance junk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
nothing wrong with the line

road game, and missing a top player

they still have 5 star guys you know

they will play D

thinking our interior makes the difference, interior D plus some 2nd chance junk
Who on their roster is a 5 star?