Here, take your time, and try not to granulate things into so fine a point it doesnt existYou are confusing respect with looking up to and geography with coach’s culture. Imho
https://www.huskermax.com/tom-osborne-importance-walk-ons/
Here, take your time, and try not to granulate things into so fine a point it doesnt existYou are confusing respect with looking up to and geography with coach’s culture. Imho
You are confusing respect with looking up to and geography with coach’s culture. Imho
I never once said all scholarship players don’t look up to walk ons. My argument from the start was that there are some scholarship players who do not look up to walk ons. I’m not sure what you want me to say…my burden of proof is 100%? I'd say beyond a reasonable doubt has been accomplished.
there are, of course, entitled scholarship players who choose to swim in the warm current. to those, I say good riddance. they have no place at Nebraska.
call it what you want, but coaches aren't the ones giving their all just to take punishment on the scout team & there aren't a whole lot of walkons from other states.
glad we can all agree.
Coaching, culture, talent, depth/walk on's. I think all can agree these are the main pillars to any good team. We can run in circles for months on this argument but IMO without any of these four you will eventually be exposed.
A guy like Damion Jackson may not see the field or ever show up in box scores however I promise you he has a positive effect on the team. And there are probably dozens more that encourage teammates in weight room, help scholly guys learn the playbook etc. We're not on this team, so cant really judge. It's odd to me why anyone would be against having a big squad. If Scott can manage having a large roster and that produces even 1 or 2 more kids a year that can help the team on the field than it's a no brainier.
As this thread has evolved into a discussion of talent vs “hard work”, 100%er, work ethic, or whatever you call it, I’m adding a thought I have had related to how talent is evaluated as part of the recruiting process. My feeling is that work ethic is a talent. As someone said above, it is something inside you. Now how much is nature vs nurture, I don’t know. I think the hope is that some of it is environmental and can be learned as part of a culture.
The narrow definition of talent is part of the reason why I think recruiting rankings need to be more holistic in nature. In my opinion, attributes like mental acuity and cognitive abilities, vision, reaction time, balance, spatial awareness, will power, determination, desire, fortitude, even characteristics like personality assessments and emotional and psychological profiles should be included in a player analysis, as they are talents that can be related to football performance. You read things from analysts like “he has good vision”, “he is a high motor guy”, “has a nose for the football”, “has good instincts”, “good decision maker”, “good balance”, “hard-worker”, etc. But how do they measure and quantify these attributes and how do they do they uniformly evaluate them? I feel like a more holistic approach is needed to evaluate the recruits in their totality. To play football at an elite level in high school, a player most likely has abilities in most of these areas in addition to his physical gifts and coincidentally they are reflected in their star rankings. But that is not always the case. A player may be so physically gifted that his physical gifts allow him to succeed at the high school level even with deficiencies in some of these other areas. Conversely, there are many players who are tremendously gifted in some of these other areas such as intelligence, vision, decision-making, spatial awareness, etc and are able to perform above the level that their physical talents alone would dictate.
I think everyone already knows this and understands it, my real point is that I think Nebraska has the resources to do something about it. They have the Nebraska Athletic Performance Lab (NAPL) and the Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior (CB3) at their disposal. It seems to me that they could use these resources to determine what talents, attributes and abilities are necessary to play football at a high level. Once they can identify the necessary attributes (physical, mental, emotional), they could possibly develop ways to measure and quantify these attributes. Similar to a Sparq score or a performance index, these attribute scores could be weighted and combined into an individual composite score. If Nebraska’s coaches were armed with a scoring matrix that allowed them to test and evaluate potential recruits in a more holistic manner, that would give them a huge advantage in identifying “hidden” talent/players but also could help them avoid “busts”. I think this would allow them to have a more manageable roster size, without having to bring in so many walk-ons hoping that a handful will pan out.
BTW, I would think a guy like this would motivate anyone, including scholarship guys.
But Damion Jackson is not from Nebraska.
That’s what you took from all that? C’mon bro... 90% are from Nebraska and from what I can tell you’ve been commenting mostly against a big roster/walkons. There’s a grey area outside your 4/5 star fantasy.
I don't know and that isn't what I saidSo none of the top players in Nebraska went elsewhere? They all either walked on at Nebraska or on scholarship?
I don't know and that isn't what I said
I didn't try to dispel that fact, I was bring it to the front.You tried to dispel the fact that Nebraska high school players are forgoing scholarships and are indeed going to walk on at Nebraska instead of taking that scholarship.
If top Nebraska high school football players are not walking on at Nebraska or playing football there on scholarship, are they just sitting at home?
Just curious
Nebraska players will forgo scholarships and pay tuition from their own pocket to be a part of the team.
example is a player gets an offer to play for South Dakota State but decides to walk on at Nebraska.
I didn't try to dispel that fact, I was bring it to the front.
Nebraska players will forgo scholarships and pay tuition from their own pocket to be a part of the team.
example is a player gets an offer to play for South Dakota State but decides to walk on at Nebraska.
well you didn't ask that question but you are certainly capable of looking that up.So I ask again, which All State players, took this option?
well you didn't ask that question but you are certainly capable of looking that up.
While your looking that up maybe you can see how many all state players didn't receive a scholarship offer.
If a player is good enough to receive an offer to walk on at Nebraska he is a qualiy player.Well you wrote the following:
"And to think just a couple years ago the board wisdom was the quality players that didn't receive a scholarship would go elsewhere because tuition is prohibitive."
Which quality players are passing up scholarships elsewhere to walk on at Nebraska?
Now to reply to this post, if you want to make grandiose proclamations about how things aren't a certain way, you need to show that it is not that way.
Perhaps there are a handful or 2 players over the past 2 years that passed up a scholarship offer from somewhere. But you need to prove that they were quality players. I assumed them being all state in Nebraska would show them to be quality players. Perhaps you don't agree.
PS - I am taking legit FCS offers, not some 20% DII offer or partial NAIA offer. Paying 80% at one of those schools is about the same or possibly more than walking on at Nebraska with in state tuition and academic scholarships.
Pretty sure that ended after the 1979 season.Who will oversee the lower units?. Osborne had a JV team that played games against JC teams. NCAA dose not allow the extra coaches or a freshman team. The JV team was also a major factor in why Oz was able to develop so much depth and talent. This will be the toughest hurdle in managing the huge roster numbers.
We had a really large rooster and he got what he wanted, any time he wanted it, from those young chicks around him. I really envied him but could never emulate him.Think about it, if the young guys ,who dont embrace those walkons as character type guys, the guys those youngins do look up to do look up to those walkons, it's only a small matter of time.
Appreciating the guys who are living their dreams, working their tails off, and following and making the culture the HC is creating too, its only natural as well.
Nice list. Can you separate the players that have played in the past 20 years?
you mean in the time the 3 amigos killed the walk on program?
Not 100% sure, but I think Brendan Holbein would qualify.So I ask again, which All State players, took this option?
Not 100% sure, but I think Brendan Holbein would qualify.