Rittenhouse jury
- Thread starter nvEERs
- Start date
I’m on the kid’s side and think it should be an easy Not Guilty, but how would anyone possibly have that information? I’m not saying you made anything up I just can’t see how that information came out
1. Supposedly, how? You trust this source, but not the media?
2. OJ Simpson......same
Only way one could get that is if they were inside with one of the clerks. I agree it would be tough. Probably some chatter around the courthouse but even that would be shaky. If the jury comes back asking the judge for clarity or for instruction that would probably tell us something.
The way the media is fanning racial flames regarding this you can tell they want more riots. They want to make owning a gun racist now. It will feed their Jan 6th narrative. Just all part of their big lie and you can tell just how desperate and pathetic they have become.
The scary part is that there are morons who believe that ****.
The scary part is that there are morons who believe that ****.
They’re trying to retake the narrative for the midterms and they’ve only got 2 arrows in the quiver, racist riots and COVID.
Get the people you are talking about with the Qanon followers in one room, and DAMN what an entertaining bunch!
EDIT: Did JFK Jr. ever make it back to Dallas? I stopped waiting for the news. :joy:
The only people dumber than the folks who thought JFKjr was alive were the morons who think that was from qanon.
Oh, so that wasn't from Qanon? Really?
EDIT: Dave, you sure do defend Qanon a lot. Just saying.
It's not really defending qanon. I am just informed because I didn't learn about qanon from the media. I read it all on my own so I didn't have to rely on others to interpret it for me.
Q never suggested JFKjr was alive. In fact when the anons asked him to clarify specifically he said he was dead.
It's like saying you believe the Bible and you also believe you can marry 40 women at the same time and someone else claiming that all Christians believe in polygamy because you do. It's just a form of poor logic.
If you’re referring to me, as I was the first to question it, then man you’re extremely thin skinned to call that “shooting the messenger”. I specifically said I believe you read or heard that somewhere. Was wondering how THAT PERSON would have obtained that.
Last edited:
To me, Covid is a boomerang. Hiden Biden has made it worse via the flow of un vaxced migrants he is allowing to cross the border. Don’t think that “arrow” will fly.
Last edited:
If you watch any of the live streams, and look at what’s been requested by the jury, the rationale relative to Doxxing, his report seems rationally likely. His source was an LEO in the courthouse itself. Not saying it’s accurate, but more than Posobiec reported it. I’m skeptical.
I'd bet if you looked back at 82's you would find that that Twitter hack has been correct about all the Russia stuff you swallowed like a fat girl deep throating a twinkie
The jury, I had someone tell me that the judge allowed Rittenhouse to blindly pick his jury. Is that accurate?
Could you help me out since you know a lot more about Qanon than I do? Where did you see the conversations between "Q" and his followers about JFK Jr.? Thanks.
I explained this before. Some of the Q stuff posted was actually factual. They were things I posted from credible sources like from the actual DSA website, DOJ website, and other government agencies. The problem is they also posted riddle like information. This opened the door for "fake" followers who pretend to be allies to run with ridiculous conspiracy theories. Hence why I warned people about trusting all the information. It was a Psyop and a poorly ran one unless its intent was to make it's so called followers look like nutjobs. If the was the intent it worked perfectly. Give some facts sprinkled in with vague riddles and let the "fake" followers get everyone who trusted in it painted with the crazy brush.
2 separate one.
Muddy the legit information behind a wall of crazy people and obvious deepfakery.
Ok. Now, can you tell me how you know that the wild conspiracy theories are from the "nutjobs" and that Qanon person isn't the nutjob? Like, are you in the inner circle? Do they write articles about it? Or is your theory about how someone is trying to delegitimize the "factual" information just one of those wild conspiracy theories?
Just my read on this from reading some of the stuff that’s posted on here.
Some of the Q people are nuts. Some are bots. Some are just normal people. Some of the Q information is legit. Some of it wild ********. Some of it is intentionally wild ********.
Bottomline, because of the ********, and a very large amount of it is, all Q stuff is disregarded by most normal people. I know the latter is a broad objective used in organized propaganda operations, falling in the PsyOp category. It’s always been like that. It’s not new. We used it all throughout WW2. Think Operation Fortitude in the lead up to DDay of which, Patton as an example of Fortitude, was used as a feint for potential landings at Calais.
I know how psychological operations work. What I said above should be a reasonable explanation of how it played out unless a person has an agenda and wants to continue painting people crazy. You're smart enough to understand you get to the truth by doing research and analyzing the facts.
Last edited:
It's like what a friend of mine told me after he was once mentioned in the National Enquirer. He said 90% of the National Enquirer is ********... but for all the ********... there's 10% that's 100% true.
Notice the people who were running it haven't been identified by any Government Agency or MSM hard News. Just rumors and speculation. Food for thought.