Riley could be fired soon

Aug 6, 2009
15,511
9,089
0
Personally, I would define "soon" as this Saturday
 
Oct 12, 2016
3,457
609
0
How do we know Moos didn't reach out to Kelly via back channels and Kelly said "no"?

UCLA just fired Mora now for a reason. Why didn't they wait til after their last game? Kelly is playing Florida vs. UCLA while Nebraska snoozes. If Frost stays we are stuck in a bad situation.
 
Oct 12, 2016
3,457
609
0
Once again... how do you know Moos hasn't already contacted Kelly and gotten a "no"?

Maybe Kelly is waiting for Riley to be fired 1st. That's why UCLA and other schools move to fire and not wait. Makes no sense for UCLA otherwise. Out of respect, some coaches will not talk to schools until their coach is fired.
 
Last edited:
Aug 6, 2009
15,511
9,089
0
Maybe Kelly is waiting for Riley to be fired 1st. That's why UCLA and other schools move to fire and not wait. Makes no sense for UCLA otherwise.
That is not how this works. Of course Riley hasn't been fired yet. But what Moos would have asked Kelly is something like this: "we might be making a change in our head coaching position at the end of the season. Would you be interested in the job were we to offer you?" Kelly may have responded: "sorry, but I am not interested in coaching at Nebraska, now, or in the future." You have no idea whether or not Moos has contacted Kelly or what was said. Nor do I. And that is the point. Just because Riley has not been fired means absolutely nothing in terms of sending out feelers via back channels to various coaches. But your post assumes that you know that, because Riley has not been fired, Moos must be sitting on his hands doing nothing. I find that highly unlikely
 
Oct 12, 2016
3,457
609
0
That is not how this works. Of course Riley hasn't been fired yet. But what Moos would have asked Kelly is something like this: "we might be making a change in our head coaching position at the end of the season. Would you be interested in the job were we to offer you?" Kelly may have responded: "sorry, but I am not interested in coaching at Nebraska, now, or in the future." You have no idea whether or not Moos has contacted Kelly or what was said. Nor do I. And that is the point. Just because Riley has not been fired means absolutely nothing in terms of sending out feelers via back channels to various coaches. But your post assumes that you know that, because Riley has not been fired, Moos must be sitting on his hands doing nothing. I find that highly unlikely

Some coaches, probably Chip Kelly, won't even entertain Nebraska via Agents, because they haven't fired their coach yet. Once they do, he express his interest. With some guys, you have to fire 1st to guage interest in others, even via agents. Who knows what is written in contracts.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
Some coaches, probably Chip Kelly, won't even entertain Nebraska via Agents, because they haven't fired their coach yet. Once they do, he express his interest. With some guys, you have to fire 1st to guage interest in others, even via agents. Who knows what is written in contracts.
I don't think those sort of ethical dilemma's affect Chip Kelly.
 

redlurker

Redshirt
Feb 8, 2007
784
26
0
Some coaches, probably Chip Kelly, won't even entertain Nebraska via Agents, because they haven't fired their coach yet. Once they do, he express his interest. With some guys, you have to fire 1st to guage interest in others, even via agents. Who knows what is written in contracts.
You serious. Anyone that has been around the game knows how this works. They all know MR is done here. If they are interested, then they are already talking. Its a big boys game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Headcard

Huskercigar

Senior
Jul 16, 2017
954
809
0
UCLA just fired Mora now for a reason. Why didn't they wait til after their last game? Kelly is playing Florida vs. UCLA while Nebraska snoozes. If Frost stays we are stuck in a bad situation.
UCLA is trying to hire an unemployed coach. We are trying to hire a coach who is employed and will not leave that position for at least 1 week longer. Nothing wrong with keeping the present guy.

For anyone who thinks having fired Riley 3-4 weeks ago was the best thing to do.......absolutely nothing would be different now if they had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Headcard
Oct 12, 2016
3,457
609
0
UCLA is trying to hire an unemployed coach. We are trying to hire a coach who is employed and will not leave that position for at least 1 week longer. Nothing wrong with keeping the present guy.

For anyone who thinks having fired Riley 3-4 weeks ago was the best thing to do.......absolutely nothing would be different now if they had.

Exactly, and what happens if we don't land that empolyed coach (Frost) and didn't
UCLA is trying to hire an unemployed coach. We are trying to hire a coach who is employed and will not leave that position for at least 1 week longer. Nothing wrong with keeping the present guy.

For anyone who thinks having fired Riley 3-4 weeks ago was the best thing to do.......absolutely nothing would be different now if they had.

Why do you think UCLA just fired Mora? Why wouldn't they also wait until after their Cal game? If Riley is fired before Friday, Frost isn't coming to NU, Moos is scrambling to get another coach.
 

newAD

All-American
Oct 14, 2007
15,429
5,006
0

Didn’t want to say this at the time, but I heard the Monday after Minnesota that Rlley, Diaco, and Langsdorf were very close to being fired. Just my own speculation that they might go through with it last Monday just to generate some interest for the last game.