Rhule needs to fire

Huskerbooster

Sophomore
Jul 9, 2025
135
127
43
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
 

Huskers+123

Sophomore
Dec 6, 2024
164
179
43
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
1754277364374.png
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
You mean like Devaney who went 101-20 at NU?
 

Cruel Halo

All-Conference
Jun 27, 2003
6,556
1,647
97
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
Are you retarded?
 

Nuts McClanahan

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2022
1,053
1,076
113
That's dumb. Stats are stats. You can't just make up your won-loss record people aren't that stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gamafn

Stlhuskers

Redshirt
Aug 25, 2008
103
17
18
If someone starts magically giving Rhule more wins than earned and you believe it, you might be in a cult.
 

Zonie87

All-American
Jun 16, 2022
3,665
6,376
113
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
All College record: Career Record: 9 Years, 59-56, .513 Win% (at major schools)
 
Jan 24, 2004
56,052
17,423
113
He's trying to score a political point. Agree with Boxes, just stop.

Crypto Meme GIF by Crypto GIFs & Memes ::: Crypto Marketing

Scope is back?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Laner2

TrueBigRedFan

All-American
Jun 29, 2004
12,550
5,146
113
Matt Rhule needs to fire his statistician immediately because this person is responsible for his losing record. The internet claims he has gone 70-83 over his career but there is no way to that’s the case. The fact the Husker website even mentions he has a losing record is proof they don’t want him to succeed at Nebraska. I would like to see a new statistician at UNL who can report better numbers for Rhule. I would say he should be 120 wins and 20 losses which would help recruiting and donors.
In view of Current Events, this one is a real hoot! And should most likely be taken as such.
 

HUSKERFAN66

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2004
21,175
3,526
113
Yeah Yeah Yeah. OP is being political. Clearly in response to the firing last week of jobs statistician
 

Laner2

Senior
Dec 27, 2007
18,967
900
113
Did the gummit checks come in today? The goobers are out in force.
 

Arf_man

Junior
May 30, 2022
147
213
43
1st. There was nothing political about this post. If certain posters take it as an inference to something happening in politics, that's their perception. 2nd, this board is full of snowflakes calling people who disagree with them snowflakes. The rest of us dont care what you believe or what misguided political stances you cling to. It's a freaking football forum. Carry on, bunch of lava rocks more like it. Think on that why don't ya now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king_kong__

Big bo fan

All-American
Jan 8, 2019
19,102
6,373
113
1st. There was nothing political about this post. If certain posters take it as an inference to something happening in politics, that's their perception. 2nd, this board is full of snowflakes calling people who disagree with them snowflakes. The rest of us dont care what you believe or what misguided political stances you cling to. It's a freaking football forum. Carry on, bunch of lava rocks more like it. Think on that why don't ya now.
What just happened recently in Washington. If you honestly don’t believe that was Ops point I feel sorry for you because you are an idiot.
 

BleedRed89

Heisman
Nov 27, 2008
34,371
53,381
113
1st. There was nothing political about this post. If certain posters take it as an inference to something happening in politics, that's their perception. 2nd, this board is full of snowflakes calling people who disagree with them snowflakes. The rest of us dont care what you believe or what misguided political stances you cling to. It's a freaking football forum. Carry on, bunch of lava rocks more like it. Think on that why don't ya now.
Well I agree with the 2nd half of your post. But you’re wrong on the 1st. This was quite objectively a political post. What the heck do you think hes talking about?
 

Arf_man

Junior
May 30, 2022
147
213
43
Objectively, the inference drawn was made political by the person who drew it. I might be an idiot, but that fact remains. The person who posted has a defense regarding political posts. And most of the people on this board are actually idiots. But we're good at something that most people will never know.
 

BleedRed89

Heisman
Nov 27, 2008
34,371
53,381
113
Objectively, the inference drawn was made political by the person who drew it. I might be an idiot, but that fact remains. The person who posted has a defense regarding political posts. And most of the people on this board are actually idiots. But we're good at something that most people will never know.
Im not sure I'm picking up what you're putting down here sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arf_man

Arf_man

Junior
May 30, 2022
147
213
43
Im not sure I'm picking up what you're putting down here sir.
That checks out. It's not that important anyway. I did just watch the big ten practice review. I honestly feel there are a lot of little things that are being taken care of and i'm super excited for this season. I can say that only happened 2 times during the scott frost era. GBR.