Toggle sidebar

Resume ...

G

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
Scangg said:
Not trying to be a downer but don't they usually say it's the entire body of work not who is playing well end of season?
Click to expand...
Correct. Somebody could probably make a reasonable argument that they might subconsciously or secretly reward teams with late peaks but the “official” policy is whole body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danprusa_4 and Scangg
D

Danprusa_4

All-Conference
Aug 29, 2018
1,678
1,283
0
Let’s not jump to conclusions. Let’s just take it one game at a time and hope we can come up with wins. We’ll let the committee do all that for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoucancallmeRay
R

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Actually they have historically considered late season efforts and even injuries. Recall what occurred when kenyon martin got hurt. Body of work yes--but trending also
 
R

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Dont recall defvinitive indictations--guess we will see A few more ranked wins and it will be put to the test.
 
bac2therac

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,278
176,945
113
ru-baby said:
Actually they have historically considered late season efforts and even injuries. Recall what occurred when kenyon martin got hurt. Body of work yes--but trending also
Click to expand...

Wrong..injuries can be considered...finish is not
 
S

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,600
4,662
62
We bring this effort and efficiency next 8, I don't think we will have to worry about resumes. The results will speak for themselves. Our Offensive Efficiency released on Bart Torvik, 138.6. Defense 97.0.
Rim 11-15, Mid 12-17, 2pt 23-32, 3pt 9-20.
Reiber scored 12pts, 2ast in 10 minutes.
 
B

biazza38

Heisman
Nov 18, 2012
14,427
17,475
81
It’s body of work.
That being said, RU had a gauntlet at the end of the year. By default a strong finish would bolster their resume a lot. MSU was a great matchup for us. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. This is till the same team that continues to start slow on the road
 
M

Myrtleknight

Senior
Mar 25, 2006
661
481
0
4 - 4 these last 8 and a win in the conference tournament usually would put us squarely on the bubble. But let’s face it the B1G tournament performance recently has been way down and I don’t think the B1G gets that many teams in this year. So that said I think we have to go 5 - 3 and a win or two in the B1G tournament to get in.
 
G

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
bac2therac said:
a win at Indiana is almost better than a win over Ohio State at the RAC

we need to split Indiana and Michigan I think
Click to expand...
If we don’t get another road win I can’t see how we’re in. 2 road wins would be big. 1 of Michigan/Indiana and some neutral wins in the conference tourney could be enough.
 
R

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,193
12,454
113
RU MAN said:
Man, this team is Jekyll and Hyde. Today, what a GREAT COMPLETE game. This IMO was their best game of the season. But can they follow this up with a win over OSU? We're too inconsistent.

But man-o-man what a GREAT WIN today!
Click to expand...
Consistency has been lacking all season resulting in embarrassing losses against out of conference opponents and some bottom ranked Big Ten rivals and great wins against Purdue.Michigan,Iowa and Michigan State.With eight games remaIning Rutgers must win at least five games to hava 18-12 record at the end of the season and 12-8 league record.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU MAN
R

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,610
10,193
113
RUJMM78 said:
Consistency has been lacking all season resulting in embarrassing losses against out of conference opponents and some bottom ranked Big Ten rivals and great wins against Purdue.Michigan,Iowa and Michigan State.With eight games remaIning Rutgers must win at least five games to hava 18-12 record at the end of the season and 12-8 league record.
Click to expand...
I couldn't agree more. The key though is can this team find 5 more wins in them? If they mirror what we saw today, then yes. If we mirror the 24 point deficit against Northwestern, or the UMASS collapse or the Lafayette debacle, then obviously no.
 
S

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
The question is can Paul continue to play like this? When he is in the zone he makes everyone better and we get easy buckets from him and dunks for Cliff. Easy buckets are so key and keep us from going on scoring droughts. Inside out passes for threes which are the easiest looks you get

If he even plays 75% as good we will win games. One thing we do know is that Paul has the effort and mindset to want to bring it game after game. This bodes well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peteyd, RU_DIO, colbert17 and 1 other person
K

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
Scangg said:
The question is can Paul continue to play like this? When he is in the zone he makes everyone better and we get easy buckets from him and dunks for Cliff. Easy buckets are so key and keep us from going on scoring droughts. Inside out passes for threes which are the easiest looks you get

If he even plays 75% as good we will win games. One thing we do know is that Paul has the effort and mindset to want to bring it game after game. This bodes well
Click to expand...
Our major problem was an inability to create easy shots. Mulcahy is solving that, at least for the past three halves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peteyd and Scangg
R

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Not accurate that it's ONLY a complete body of work. So much of that is committe speak when dealing with tough choices and explantions which us usaully easy to decipher.

See numerous committe quotes however that "the eye test" is a component. If a team is wilting toward the end and not passing the "eye test", then it's tough for them. Thus, if they have great november wins and dont pass the eye test in february, they are likley going top struggle to be in. Hence-a wilting team is factored absolutely in selection.

By the same token, a hot team in February who is passing the eye test, DOES have their momentum and culmination work considered. It's just inaccurate to say otherwise. Of course the committee doesnt say we take hot teams and dont care about results. But their eye test-not in november but at tourney time-tells us just that, they consider it. Argue all one might but it's part of the consideration.
 
bac2therac

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,278
176,945
113
ru-baby said:
Not accurate that it's ONLY a complete body of work. So much of that is committe speak when dealing with tough choices and explantions which us usaully easy to decipher.

See numerous committe quotes however that "the eye test" is a component. If a team is wilting toward the end and not passing the "eye test", then it's tough for them. Thus, if they have great november wins and dont pass the eye test in february, they are likley going top struggle to be in. Hence-a wilting team is factored absolutely in selection.

By the same token, a hot team in February who is passing the eye test, DOES have their momentum and culmination work considered. It's just inaccurate to say otherwise. Of course the committee doesnt say we take hot teams and dont care about results. But their eye test-not in november but at tourney time-tells us just that, they consider it. Argue all one might but it's part of the consideration.
Click to expand...


you are wrong

 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38, Plum Street, GORU2014 and 1 other person
T

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,700
19,757
61
Top half of the B1G. That’s what needs to happen.

If that does happen, we’re likely looking at being in the play-in games
 
G

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
ru-baby said:
Not accurate that it's ONLY a complete body of work. So much of that is committe speak when dealing with tough choices and explantions which us usaully easy to decipher.

See numerous committe quotes however that "the eye test" is a component. If a team is wilting toward the end and not passing the "eye test", then it's tough for them. Thus, if they have great november wins and dont pass the eye test in february, they are likley going top struggle to be in. Hence-a wilting team is factored absolutely in selection.

By the same token, a hot team in February who is passing the eye test, DOES have their momentum and culmination work considered. It's just inaccurate to say otherwise. Of course the committee doesnt say we take hot teams and dont care about results. But their eye test-not in november but at tourney time-tells us just that, they consider it. Argue all one might but it's part of the consideration.
Click to expand...
What you’re saying hasn’t been confirmed anywhere for a number of years. The NET weights early season and late season games equally (https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketbal...ollege-basketballs-net-rankings-explained?amp) and eye test/late season momentum aren’t listed as factors anywhere that I’ve seen (https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...-uses-to-compare-ncaa-tournament-resumes/amp/ is pretty comprehensive).

Like bac said, we may see more of an impact on our NET and resume from late season games just by nature of our conference being so difficult, but end of season momentum hasn’t been a known key consideration for a number of years now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38
R

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Again, has the comittee sworn off the eye test---dont believe so.

I know this affects the absoluteness of the number crunching and net, but it is there.

Suppose a team has 5-7 top twenty wins through january and goes winless in february and their conference tourney----That momentum isnt considered but if their net held on they are in?

Numbers count and the bracketology can go on and i know I'm touching a third rail for some---but reality is that there's more though and the eye test at seasons end is a part-a non quantifiable part.
 
G

GORU2014

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2013
2,640
4,670
113
ru-baby said:
Again, has the comittee sworn off the eye test---dont believe so.

I know this affects the absoluteness of the number crunching and net, but it is there.

Suppose a team has 5-7 top twenty wins through january and goes winless in february and their conference tourney----That momentum isnt considered but if their net held on they are in?

Numbers count and the bracketology can go on and i know I'm touching a third rail for some---but reality is that there's more though and the eye test at seasons end is a part-a non quantifiable part.
Click to expand...
You’re just ignoring all evidence and statements otherwise because you want it to be true. They do not openly acknowledge season finishes as a data point anymore and per bac’s link they haven’t since 2012. The “eye test” you’re referencing is outdated and no longer exists to anyone’s knowledge. Early season games and late season games are weighted equally and things like road/neutral wins, quad 1/2 wins, and avoiding quad 3/4 losses are more important.
 
RedTeamUpstream94

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,374
6,308
113
Just have to look on the bright side - this gauntlet we are facing is just the opportunity we need

with the hit our rating took by those early season debacles it will take several more high level wins to increase our rating to a point where the ncaa is a possibility

if our remaining schedule was a bunch of games against nebraska those wins wouldn’t move the needle
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peteyd and GORU2014
P

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
ru-baby said:
Not accurate that it's ONLY a complete body of work. So much of that is committe speak when dealing with tough choices and explantions which us usaully easy to decipher.

See numerous committe quotes however that "the eye test" is a component. If a team is wilting toward the end and not passing the "eye test", then it's tough for them. Thus, if they have great november wins and dont pass the eye test in february, they are likley going top struggle to be in. Hence-a wilting team is factored absolutely in selection.

By the same token, a hot team in February who is passing the eye test, DOES have their momentum and culmination work considered. It's just inaccurate to say otherwise. Of course the committee doesnt say we take hot teams and dont care about results. But their eye test-not in november but at tourney time-tells us just that, they consider it. Argue all one might but it's part of the consideration.
Click to expand...
Bac knows his sh$t here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38 and bac2therac
O

OriginalKnight

All-Conference
Sep 16, 2014
4,446
3,561
71
Danprusa_4 said:
Let’s not jump to conclusions. Let’s just take it one game at a time and hope we can come up with wins. We’ll let the committee do all that for us.
Click to expand...
We aren’t players or coaches so taking it one game at a time doesn’t mean anything .
 
bac2therac

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,278
176,945
113
Any eye test comes when committees watch games late in the season orvin conference tourneys. There will always be a subjective element at some point in the process. Explicitly there are criteria to be followed. What seperates that last school getting from getting out rests with each committee member

Rutgers has alot of negatives on the resume. They need to win as much as possible to make these losses seem more like outliers. Unfortunately that Lafayette loss is the real killer right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom