People are REALLY latching onto anything that they think might favor Rutgers
Resume ...
- Thread starter Ru-baby
- Start date
Jumped from 111 to 100 NET. Still a loooooong way to go to even think talking resume. Let's win on Wednesday
We just lost 3 out of 4 to bottom feeders before MSU. You have to be kidding me. We have a lot of work to do during this gauntlet
It is crazy isn't it...had we won the NW game and the Minny game we are looking at 2/3 in the B1G and prob about 20-30 spots higher in NET
The what ifs can go in the other direction too.. down late in the second half to Nebraska, miracle Harper shot against Purdue, down 8 with 3 left tonight
A lot of you guys know the metrics better than me. so it seems that we are clinging to keep contact w the bubble. But if you look at it differently: Are we one of the sixty-eight best teams in the country today, the answer is pretty obvious.
Good
NJIT won at New Hampshire,
Maine won at Albany,
Depaul won at home vs Georgetown
Nebraska(2-0) beat Minnesota(0-1)
Bad
UMass loss at home to GWU
Lehigh loss at Colgate
NJIT won at New Hampshire,
Maine won at Albany,
Depaul won at home vs Georgetown
Nebraska(2-0) beat Minnesota(0-1)
Bad
UMass loss at home to GWU
Lehigh loss at Colgate
Another piece of the resume added today. Continue to assert that improving teams as the season goes on will get tourney looks, NET be damned. A loss in November is not the negative equal of a top 20 road win in february. Glad Revsine and others are chiming in now with that position.
"If the Quad 1 wins they have accumulated are not enough to offset a couple of bad losses from early in the season, then the system is flawed and should be changed. That’s a tourney quality team that no one would want to play.” -- Dave Revsine, Big Ten Network.
"If the Quad 1 wins they have accumulated are not enough to offset a couple of bad losses from early in the season, then the system is flawed and should be changed. That’s a tourney quality team that no one would want to play.” -- Dave Revsine, Big Ten Network.