Football Rankings (9/30)

[Alum-Ni]

Link: Omaha World-Herald

Link: Lincoln Journal Star

Link: Huskerland Preps 11-Man | 8-Man / 6-Man

Link: NebPreps

Link: NEBHSFB

Link: NCN

Link: NENextt

 

[Alum-Ni]

Composite rankings

CLASS A
1. Millard South (7) (4-1) - 70 pts
2. Elkhorn South (5-0) - 61
3. Omaha Creighton Prep (5-0) - 58
4t. Omaha Central (4-1) - 40
4t. Omaha Westside (4-1) - 40
6. Omaha North (3-2) - 34
7. Lincoln East (4-1) - 25
8. Papillion-LaVista South (4-1) - 21
9. Kearney (3-2) - 17
10. Bellevue West (2-3) - 16

Contenders
Columbus (4-1) - 3

==========================

CLASS B
1. Elkhorn North (6) (5-0) - 67 pts
2. Waverly (1) (5-0) - 61
3. Norris (5-0) - 59
4. Bennington (4-1) - 51
5. Gretna East (4-1) - 39
6. Omaha Skutt (4-1) - 35
7. Seward (3-2) - 27
8. Scottsbluff (4-1) - 22
9. Gretna (2-3) - 13
10. McCook (4-1) - 10

Contenders
Plattsmouth (3-2) - 1

==========================

CLASS C1
1. Wahoo (7) (5-0) - 70 pts
2. Central City (5-0) - 63
3. Columbus Lakeview (5-0) - 54
4. Ashland-Greenwood (4-1) - 48
5. Sidney (5-0) - 45
6. Elkhorn Mt. Michael (4-1) - 30
7. O'Neill (5-0) - 26
8. Fort Calhoun (4-1) - 21
9. Pierce (4-1) - 17
10. Syracuse (5-0) - 8

Contenders
Aurora (2-3) - 3

==========================

CLASS C2
1. Wahoo Neumann (3) (5-0) - 66 pts
2. Hartington Cedar Catholic (4) (5-0) - 65
3. Norfolk Catholic (4-1) - 57
4. Boone Central (3-2) - 40
5t. Grand Island Central Catholic (5-0) - 38
5t. Kearney Catholic (5-0) - 38
7. Fremont Bergan (4-1) - 37
8. Lincoln Lutheran (4-1) - 16
9t. Doniphan-Trumbull (4-1) - 11
9t. West Point-Beemer (3-2) - 11

Contenders
Ord (2-3) - 5
Wood River (4-1) - 1

==========================

CLASS D1
1. Shelby/Rising City (6) (5-0) - 69 pts
2. Dundy County-Stratton (1) (5-0) - 62
3. Sandy Creek (4-1) - 58
4. Wausa/Osmond (5-0) - 47
5. Bloomfield (4-1) - 35
6. Crofton (3-2) - 30
7. Thayer Central (4-1) - 29
8. Plainview (4-1) - 18
9. Bridgeport (4-1) - 10
10. Ravenna (5-0) - 9

Contenders
Hartington-Newcastle (4-1) - 6
North Platte St. Patrick's (4-1) - 4
Sutton (4-1) - 4
Nebraska City Lourdes (4-1) - 3
Hemingford (5-0) - 1

==========================

CLASS D2
1. Archangels Catholic (3) (5-0) - 64 pts
2. Central Valley (3) (5-0) - 60 pts
3. Howells-Dodge (5-0) - 54
4. O'Neill St. Mary's (5-0) - 52
5. Wynot (4-1) - 45
6. Lawrence-Nelson (4-1) - 32
7. Hitchcock County (5-0) - 26
8. Twin Loup (4-1) - 19
9. Neligh-Oakdale (5-0) - 10
10. Anselmo-Merna (4-1) - 8

Contenders
Elmwood-Murdock (4-1) - 6
Loomis (4-1) - 6
Mullen (5-0) - 3

==========================

CLASS D6
1. Garden County (5) (5-0) - 59 pts
2. Stuart (4-1) - 51
3. Red Cloud (1) (4-0) - 49
4. Sumner-Eddyville-Miller (3-1) - 35
5. Southwest (4-0) - 33
6. Leyton (4-0) - 27
7. Silver Lake (3-1) - 21
8. Hampton (4-0) - 18
9t. Wallace (3-1) - 13
9t. Wauneta-Palisade (4-0) - 13

Contenders
Pawnee City (3-1) - 11

 

[Anon1695937414]

Composite rankings

CLASS A
1. Millard South (7) (4-1) - 70 pts
2. Elkhorn South (5-0) - 61
3. Omaha Creighton Prep (5-0) - 58
4t. Omaha Central (4-1) - 40
4t. Omaha Westside (4-1) - 40
6. Omaha North (3-2) - 34
7. Lincoln East (4-1) - 25
8. Papillion-LaVista South (4-1) - 21
9. Kearney (3-2) - 17
10. Bellevue West (2-3) - 16

Contenders
Columbus (4-1) - 3

==========================

CLASS B
1. Elkhorn North (6) (5-0) - 67 pts
2. Waverly (1) (5-0) - 61
3. Norris (5-0) - 59
4. Bennington (4-1) - 51
5. Gretna East (4-1) - 39
6. Omaha Skutt (4-1) - 35
7. Seward (3-2) - 27
8. Scottsbluff (4-1) - 22
9. Gretna (2-3) - 13
10. McCook (4-1) - 10

Contenders
Plattsmouth (3-2) - 1

==========================

CLASS C1
1. Wahoo (7) (5-0) - 70 pts
2. Central City (5-0) - 63
3. Columbus Lakeview (5-0) - 54
4. Ashland-Greenwood (4-1) - 48
5. Sidney (5-0) - 45
6. Elkhorn Mt. Michael (4-1) - 30
7. O'Neill (5-0) - 26
8. Fort Calhoun (4-1) - 21
9. Pierce (4-1) - 17
10. Syracuse (5-0) - 8

Contenders
Aurora (2-3) - 3

==========================

CLASS C2
1. Wahoo Neumann (3) (5-0) - 66 pts
2. Hartington Cedar Catholic (4) (5-0) - 65
3. Norfolk Catholic (4-1) - 57
4. Boone Central (3-2) - 40
5t. Grand Island Central Catholic (5-0) - 38
5t. Kearney Catholic (5-0) - 38
7. Fremont Bergan (4-1) - 37
8. Lincoln Lutheran (4-1) - 16
9t. Doniphan-Trumbull (4-1) - 11
9t. West Point-Beemer (3-2) - 11

Contenders
Ord (2-3) - 5
Wood River (4-1) - 1

==========================

CLASS D1
1. Shelby/Rising City (6) (5-0) - 69 pts
2. Dundy County-Stratton (1) (5-0) - 62
3. Sandy Creek (4-1) - 58
4. Wausa/Osmond (5-0) - 47
5. Bloomfield (4-1) - 35
6. Crofton (3-2) - 30
7. Thayer Central (4-1) - 29
8. Plainview (4-1) - 18
9. Bridgeport (4-1) - 10
10. Ravenna (5-0) - 9

Contenders
Hartington-Newcastle (4-1) - 6
North Platte St. Patrick's (4-1) - 4
Sutton (4-1) - 4
Nebraska City Lourdes (4-1) - 3
Hemingford (5-0) - 1

==========================

CLASS D2
1. Archangels Catholic (3) (5-0) - 64 pts
2. Central Valley (3) (5-0) - 60 pts
3. Howells-Dodge (5-0) - 54
4. O'Neill St. Mary's (5-0) - 52
5. Wynot (4-1) - 45
6. Lawrence-Nelson (4-1) - 32
7. Hitchcock County (5-0) - 26
8. Twin Loup (4-1) - 19
9. Neligh-Oakdale (5-0) - 10
10. Anselmo-Merna (4-1) - 8

Contenders
Elmwood-Murdock (4-1) - 6
Loomis (4-1) - 6
Mullen (5-0) - 3

==========================

CLASS D6
1. Garden County (5) (5-0) - 59 pts
2. Stuart (4-1) - 51
3. Red Cloud (1) (4-0) - 49
4. Sumner-Eddyville-Miller (3-1) - 35
5. Southwest (4-0) - 33
6. Leyton (4-0) - 27
7. Silver Lake (3-1) - 21
8. Hampton (4-0) - 18
9t. Wallace (3-1) - 13
9t. Wauneta-Palisade (4-0) - 13

Contenders
Pawnee City (3-1) - 11

I always glance through these and know its tough to know which of the 7+ undefeated D2 schools is better but assume the higher classes should be more obvious. I dont know huskerlandbob but how does Central beat Westside on Westside's home field, have the same record and be 3 spots behind them. That is completely ridiculous.

 

[GoSkers3]

I always glance through these and know its tough to know which of the 7+ undefeated D2 schools is better but assume the higher classes should be more obvious. I dont know huskerlandbob but how does Central beat Westside on Westside's home field, have the same record and be 3 spots behind them. That is completely ridiculous.

Don't really want to speak for HuskerlandBob but it seems as if he's looking at the entire body of work. Which I am not saying is right or wrong because I think results on the field have to count for something. But in the end, these rankings don't mean anything for state seeding or anything for that matter. I wouldn't worry about rankings, instead worry about working hard and finding ways to win.

 

[Anon1695937414]

Don't really want to speak for HuskerlandBob but it seems as if he's looking at the entire body of work. Which I am not saying is right or wrong because I think results on the field have to count for something. But in the end, these rankings don't mean anything for state seeding or anything for that matter. I wouldn't worry about rankings, instead worry about working hard and finding ways to win.

Completely agree and dont usually nitpick. I enjoy the ratings as another measuring stick as the power points are also an inexact science. I probably wouldnt have said anything if westside was 1 spot above central but 3 makes it seem like someone forgot to check last week's scores before submitting rankings. As with all rankings recency bias does need to come into play. they lost by 31 but that was a few weeks ago...more recently they have the same record as a team they went on the road and beat.