Quixotic Purdue - no idea what to expect

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
Need to guard Stefanovic since he can hit the 3. Overall, they don't take many 3s, however. I think we can turn them over. I think Myles will do fine on Harms and Ron or Yeboah will do ok with Williams. We match up well at the guard spots. If we get back to our swarming defense, I think we'll handle Purdue.
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,779
15,702
85
Purdue always seems to have (1) some giant guy, and (2) sharp shooters from 3. This year that team was Iowa that we faced. Haven’t followed Purdue closely but Haas (big guy) is gone and so is that guy that hit all those 3s at MSG started with an S? Do they have any of those type players this year? Big guy and 3 pt shooters?
 

RURM85

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2012
7,544
3,027
0
Purdue is going to be a tough matchup although they’ve played very poorly on the road. Sasha Stefanovic is their 3 point specialist and is streaky. Also Thompson (PJ’s little brother) comes off the bench and against Wisconsin knocked down 3s. Nojel Eastern is playing his best basketball over the last 3 games and is a dribble and drive scorer. Eastern is also one of the best defenders in conference. Evan Boudreaux started against Whisky and was a scoring and rebounding monster. That’s not to mention their 2 Bigs, Williams and Haarms. haarms will definitely step out for a 3 once or twice a game, and his percentage is decent.

This game concerns me more than most games especially since it’s our 4th game in 10 days.
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
As Zap & some others have said, we were tired for Nebby. I believe that is true. Believe we will have caught our breath & will come out ready to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields and MV9000

superfan01

All-American
May 29, 2003
8,827
8,080
78
As Zap & some others have said, we were tired for Nebby. I believe that is true. Believe we will have caught our breath & will come out ready to play.
How were we tired for Nebraska? They were the ones who flew half way across the country. Every other team in the BIG has played the same number of games in the same time. In fact we have played the most home games in league and played in no pre season tournaments that had to deal with extra travel.we also have a deep bench.

The tired argument makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and RutCorRx

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
11,103
7,110
113
As Zap & some others have said, we were tired for Nebby. I believe that is true. Believe we will have caught our breath & will come out ready to play.
If we were tired, that will be a problem going forward. This is pretty close to what the in-season schedule looks like and will going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutCorRx

rsutton86

Senior
Dec 1, 2005
5,052
859
78
How were we tired for Nebraska? They were the ones who flew half way across the country. Every other team in the BIG has played the same number of games in the same time. In fact we have played the most home games in league and played in no pre season tournaments that had to deal with extra travel.we also have a deep bench.

The tired argument makes no sense.

Nebraska had an extra day rest, plus we were coming back cross country from Iowa on Wednesday. Also, Nebraska had a much shorter trip in the same time zone from Wisconsin the night before.
 

fbc1866

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2005
5,812
2,113
113
The next three games will be fun to watch. They are finally concern about playing RU now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LC-88

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
170,002
25,747
113
Nebraska had an extra day rest, plus we were coming back cross country from Iowa on Wednesday. Also, Nebraska had a much shorter trip in the same time zone from Wisconsin the night before.

I noticed right away that we looked slow compared to Nebraska, particularly on defense
Not getting into position to defend corner shots and their guards penetrating all day

I would say we looked tired
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,756
10,481
113
Purdue always seems to have (1) some giant guy, and (2) sharp shooters from 3. This year that team was Iowa that we faced. Haven’t followed Purdue closely but Haas (big guy) is gone and so is that guy that hit all those 3s at MSG started with an S? Do they have any of those type players this year? Big guy and 3 pt shooters?
I watched them twice this year. When they played Illinois, they looked soft below average and lost by 17 at home. I then saw them beat Michigan State at home where they were a completely different team, beating MSU by 29. In the win, they were knocking down their shots (MSU couldn't hit the broadside of a barn that game) and Haarms and Wiliams played Tillman, Henry, Brown really tough.

Which team do we get? The former or the latter? Hmmm. The games above were at home for them. They are not very good on the road. I believe they're 0-5. Let's get out there and punch them in the mouth right away and take any momentum away from them. We play our game and focus on good D we win this game going away.
 

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,459
44,500
113
Purdue always seems to have (1) some giant guy, and (2) sharp shooters from 3. This year that team was Iowa that we faced. Haven’t followed Purdue closely but Haas (big guy) is gone and so is that guy that hit all those 3s at MSG started with an S? Do they have any of those type players this year? Big guy and 3 pt shooters?
Think you're thinking of Carson Edwards their all world scoring guard, who shredded everyone including us. They don't have anyone like him this year. Very beatable if we play high intensity defense, which we've only seen in stretches the last 2 games. Would also be nice to continue our improved three point shooting from the last two games of 15-43 (35%) vs. our season average of 31%. Also noticed we're now giving up threes at 30% for the season, when that was down around 25% two games ago (Iowa and NE killed that).
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,370
12,675
113
I watched them twice this year. When they played Illinois, they looked soft below average and lost by 17 at home. I then saw them beat Michigan State at home where they were a completely different team, beating MSU by 29. In the win, they were knocking down their shots (MSU couldn't hit the broadside of a barn that game) and Haarms and Wiliams played Tillman, Henry, Brown really tough.

Which team do we get? The former or the latter? Hmmm. The games above were at home for them. They are not very good on the road. I believe they're 0-5. Let's get out there and punch them in the mouth right away and take any momentum away from them. We play our game and focus on good D we win this game going away.
The last two home games Rutgers has started slowly on offense and it took 5 minutes to catch up.
 

Westcoast

All-American
Nov 14, 2001
22,416
5,976
113
I noticed right away that we looked slow compared to Nebraska, particularly on defense
Not getting into position to defend corner shots and their guards penetrating all day

I would say we looked tired

The funny thing is, being over confident looks the same as tired - because that's how you play - sluggish, a step slow, low energy, lazy feet on defense.

But fatigue was not the issue imho.

Even so, they'll have just over 3 days between games so they should be 100%.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football PFF Grades + Snap Counts versus Nebraska
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers vs Penn State odds: Point spread released on Scarlet Knights, Nittany Lions
  3. 03 The Knight Report Football Every throw from Rutgers Football Quarterbacks versus Nebraska
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Postgame Show: Nebraska Cornhuskers Edition - TKR Pod
  5. 05 The Knight Report Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano's Nebraska Postgame Press Conference