Questions Congress should ask Mueller when he testifies

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Sad. We now have two right-wing posters on this board who have officially called Mueller a political hack or deep state. You all should never call anyone stupid.

and we have an entire political party backed by its sycophant supporters essentially calling Mueller "incompetent" because none of you believe the conclusions he stated in his report.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Mr Mueller, you were charged with investigating what influence the Russians asserted trying to interfere with our election in '16. You looked into the Trump campaign, why didn't you look into the Clinton campaign's interactions with the Russians to determine what involvement they had with that side of the race?
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Mr. Mueller, were you able to confirm that all of the information submitted in those FISA applications had been 100% corroborated and verified as well as all of the other supporting documentation offered to secure those warrants? Did you access or utilize any of the information gathered from the subsequent "spying" on the Trump campaign which those warrants allowed? If so, can you explain to us what it was that you learned? Did you include any of that information in your final report? If you didn't include any information gathered during that spying in your final report, why not?
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Mueller has violated American's constitutional rights and has been reprimanded by the DOJ and FISA Court.

Another swing and a miss.

 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,367
4,584
113
Another swing and a miss.

You live in your own little world don't you precious !
https://www.aclu-wa.org/blog/surveillance-abuses-report-details-pattern-egregious-violations-fbi
https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-impro...vists-says-justice-department-inspector-gener
Now if we could figure out who was the FBI Director when all this spying on United States Citizens was happening under both Republicans and Democrats from 2001 to 2011.
That's right it was Robert Mueller !!! Has it dawned on you yet why he was chosen.
 
Last edited:

The Dunedein

Junior
Aug 1, 2003
2,138
329
83
Mr. Mueller, do you agree or disagree with the more than 800 former federal prosecutors who have read the evidence contained in the Mueller Report and signed a document stating that each of them would indict the POTUS for obstruction of justice were it not for the guidance-opinion of the DOJ that a sitting president cannot be indicted?

Why do you hold that opinion (whatever it is)?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,367
4,584
113
Mr. Mueller, do you agree or disagree with the more than 800 former federal prosecutors who have read the evidence contained in the Mueller Report and signed a document stating that each of them would indict the POTUS for obstruction of justice were it not for the guidance-opinion of the DOJ that a sitting president cannot be indicted?

Why do you hold that opinion (whatever it is)?
It was 400 and it's because they are about to get caught up in illegally spying on United States citizens. If you work as a defense attorney you know that some Law enforcement agencies have been cheating the system for years. Maybe Barr isn't a fan of the so called Patriot Act ? Or he just doesn't like how it's possibly been weaponized against political foes and citizens ?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Mr. Mueller, do you agree or disagree with the more than 800 former federal prosecutors who have read the evidence contained in the Mueller Report and signed a document stating that each of them would indict the POTUS for obstruction of justice were it not for the guidance-opinion of the DOJ that a sitting president cannot be indicted?

Why do you hold that opinion (whatever it is)?
Not a partisan
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Mr. Mueller, do you agree or disagree with the more than 800 former federal prosecutors who have read the evidence contained in the Mueller Report and signed a document stating that each of them would indict the POTUS for obstruction of justice were it not for the guidance-opinion of the DOJ that a sitting president cannot be indicted?

Why do you hold that opinion (whatever it is)?

If you agree, why? If you disagree, why?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
If you agree, why? If you disagree, why?
Why would it matter to him what 400 prosecutora thought?

Those 400 were not chosen to be special prosecutor. He was. He made a decision based on the facts he investigated. Should I say passed on making a decision.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Why would it matter to him what 400 prosecutora thought?

Those 400 were not chosen to be special prosecutor. He was. He made a decision based on the facts he investigated. Should I say passed on making a decision.

Exactly! So he needs to explain just what prevented him from saying precisely what those shills said if he agrees with their analysis of the evidence? They certainly weren't restrained from offering their own opinions on if Trump should be indicted, why was Mueller so gun shy? It's his freaking report! [eyeroll]
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Exactly! So he needs to explain just what prevented him from saying precisely what those shills said if he agrees with their analysis of the evidence? They certainly weren't restrained from offering their own opinions on if Trump should be indicted, why was Mueller so gun shy? It's his freaking report! [eyeroll]
His goal was not to push for impeachment of Trump. His goal was to give Congress just enough ammo to keep investigating Trump because ongoing investigations is the sheild needed to try to run out the clock.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,367
4,584
113
Exactly! So he needs to explain just what prevented him from saying precisely what those shills said if he agrees with their analysis of the evidence? They certainly weren't restrained from offering their own opinions on if Trump should be indicted, why was Mueller so gun shy? It's his freaking report! [eyeroll]
Only the delusional and slow to catch on over at the far left want to continue talking about Russia. They can't defend the evidence and trust me they don't want to try in court, that's why they are scared shitless of Barr. This was a perjury trap from the beginning !
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
His goal was not to push for impeachment of Trump. His goal was to give Congress just enough ammo to keep investigating Trump because ongoing investigations is the sheild needed to try to run out the clock.

True...but his PRIMARY responsibility as a special Prosecutor was to find and submit evidence of a crime. If he found a crime, name it and present the evidence for prosecution. If there was no crime, say that and then close up shop & go home. He did neither.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Only the delusional and slow to catch on the far left want to continue talking about Russia. They can't defend the evidence and trust me they don't want to try in court, that's why they are scared shitless of Barr. This was a perjury trap from the beginning !

Exactly!
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Mr. Mueller, do you agree or disagree with the more than 800 former federal prosecutors who have read the evidence contained in the Mueller Report and signed a document stating that each of them would indict the POTUS for obstruction of justice were it not for the guidance-opinion of the DOJ that a sitting president cannot be indicted?

Why do you hold that opinion (whatever it is)?

It'd be interesting to see how much that would involve the conspiracy investigation, and the total missteps by the prior DOJ, in a court of law. This of course won't matter in the House.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
It was 400 and it's because they are about to get caught up in illegally spying on United States citizens. If you work as a defense attorney you know that some Law enforcement agencies have been cheating the system for years. Maybe Barr isn't a fan of the so called Patriot Act ? Or he just doesn't like how it's possibly been weaponized against political foes and citizens ?

LOL!
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,367
4,584
113
You obviously didn't read anything I posted from the ACLU, a far left watchdog organization. Seriously at this point you're the only one who doesn't get it.
From one of the articles !
The FBI also made false and misleading statements to Congress and the American public to mute criticism over its unlawful spying activities, including a false claim that improper surveillance of a 2002 anti-war protest in Pittsburgh was related to a separate, validly approved FBI investigation. This false information was repeated by FBI Director Robert Mueller before Congress and in communications between the Bureau and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
You obviously did read anything I posted from the ACLU, a far left watchdog organization. Seriously at this point you're the only one who doesn't get it.
From one of the articles !
The FBI also made false and misleading statements to Congress and the American public to mute criticism over its unlawful spying activities, including a false claim that improper surveillance of a 2002 anti-war protest in Pittsburgh was related to a separate, validly approved FBI investigation. This false information was repeated by FBI Director Robert Mueller before Congress and in communications between the Bureau and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).

Gunny, you are wasting your time trying to talk facts with that particular poster. You might as well be watching paint dry....poster will NEVER change color or appearance.
(unless switching between Black & white)[winking]
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,367
4,584
113
Gunny, you are wasting your time trying to talk facts with that particular poster. You might as well be watching paint dry....it'll never change color or appearance.
It's not for her. :wink:
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You obviously did read anything I posted from the ACLU, a far left watchdog organization. Seriously at this point you're the only one who doesn't get it.
From one of the articles !
The FBI also made false and misleading statements to Congress and the American public to mute criticism over its unlawful spying activities, including a false claim that improper surveillance of a 2002 anti-war protest in Pittsburgh was related to a separate, validly approved FBI investigation. This false information was repeated by FBI Director Robert Mueller before Congress and in communications between the Bureau and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).

All that ******** you have spewed and you have never cited a source to corroborate your statement

Mueller has been reprimanded by the DOJ and FISA Court.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
All that ******** you have spewed and you have never cited a source to corroborate your statement


We can say the same thing about your 2018 250K tax returns filed with NO ITEMIZED DEDUCTIONS...or your alleged dual racial citizenship.[eyeroll]
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Mr. Mueller, based on all the evidence you have, if Donald Trump were not President of the United States, would you charge him with obstruction of justice?
 

JWG66

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2013
13,215
1,773
113
All questions accepted. I have a couple that we really need answers to.

First and foremost, when did you first learn for certain that there was no conspiracy between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, and why did the investigation continue after that date?

Where is the other half of the report? The one that details the set up the spies put into the opposition campaign.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,691
7,875
113
Mr. Mueller, based on all the evidence you have, if Donald Trump were not President of the United States, would you charge him with obstruction of justice?

I didn't find enough evidence to charge the President...I said that in my report

I can't be "obstructed" from finding a non existent crime!
 
Last edited:

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,612
839
113
Mr. Mueller, based on all the evidence you have, if Donald Trump were not President of the United States, would you charge him with obstruction of justice?
He could have answered that in his report. He cant answer that nowm
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
696
0
Dems don't want Mueller to testify...

The last thing they want is Mueller to say, "Trump didn't collude with Russia."...


who wrote it... my guess is Weissman & Rhee...

with Nellie doing the background...