A couple things. First, Mullen gave us a reputation as a program that develops quarterbacks. A reputation that we have never had before. And not one I'd like to see us lose. What is Moorehead's history with developing quarterbacks?
Another thing, in the SI article, I think I remember it saying that as part of Moorehead's offense, he has the quarterback look back at him for the reads. I think Mullen mostly coaches his quarterback to read defenses pre-snap and make calls of their own. At least I think that is right. If so, I think I kind of like that style better. Allows you to play with a little more tempo, and I think it engages and expands the quarterback's ability better than just relying on the coach to make reads for him.
Perhaps I don't understand these intricacies. I don't know. What do you y'all think about those issues?
Another thing, in the SI article, I think I remember it saying that as part of Moorehead's offense, he has the quarterback look back at him for the reads. I think Mullen mostly coaches his quarterback to read defenses pre-snap and make calls of their own. At least I think that is right. If so, I think I kind of like that style better. Allows you to play with a little more tempo, and I think it engages and expands the quarterback's ability better than just relying on the coach to make reads for him.
Perhaps I don't understand these intricacies. I don't know. What do you y'all think about those issues?
