I would consider it. It’s not so much about Trump, it’s about anti-establishment independently wealthy people doing right by the people. If the GOPs heed the warning and promote people capable of accomplishing things then I’d stay. If they aren’t smart enough to figure it out I’d migrate over to whatever party Trump starts.
I’ll support whoever the anti-globalist and anti-China candidate is. It’s counterintuitive to put the world before our nation, and that’s what we saw with Obama that turned me off. We should be doing what’s in our best interests as a nation, period, and **** the rest of the world.
Well stated opinion. Don't agree but do appreciate the perspective.
I guess obama got his "lead from behind" from taking the Tranny's mule from behind!
There is a difference in leading the world and giving deference to it. Helping out 3rd world nations to our own detriment in long term industry is what I’m talking about. I didn’t list climate change because nothing we do will matter unless China, India, Brazil, Mexico and a couple of other nations get serious as well. The Paris accords were the biggest slight of hand, 3 card Monty game I’ve ever seen perpetrated in politics. But because it was couched in climate change, the left didn’t even bother to look. The rhetoric has you all blind to the money scam.
If you're scared, just stay home.
Scared? No. I just don’t think it’s in the best interests of our country to cede industry and sovereignty over to other elements of the world. It’s very short sighted.
If the 'establishment types' again dominate the party and insist on running the likes of McCain and Romney they will continue to lose BIG TIME. The people have seen that the future lies with the 'populist' movement Trump showed could be a big winner for them. Major question going forward is what will be changed relative to the election laws (mail ins, ballot harvesting, illegal voting in all the forms we have seen this year, etc). If the Dems gain control of Senate along with the House and WH the Republicans face extinction asa a political force. With the probability of stacking the Supreme Court so that no ruling goes against their desires, adding Liberal States so that they have a near guarantee of majorities for the foreseeable future, abolishing much of the Constitution, especially the Electoral College system that a would allow the few large States/Cities to control elections, open borders with all or greater rights that citizens would have, etc. we devolve into the equivalent of an irrelevant World 'former power' and look like others who have tried Socialism/Communism/Marxism with decline was a predicted outcome. The Dems have plotted and seem to have succeeded in setting in motion the necessary steps tp take over and destroy what was stated 250 years ago. Hard to imaging how tis Country can survive and look at all like that into which we were born several years ago. Sad that we have allowed this travesty to unfold. I see a difficult, if not nearly impossible, task to attempt reconstruction of what will have been destroyed in a few short years of a Biden, Harris, AOC, Bernie, etc. rule. we who are old will be spared the horror. Our children and grandchildren will fail to garner the liberties, freedoms, and successes that were expected by those generations that preceded them.
I wouldn't and I think most Repubs on the forum are smart enough to realize it would be sheer stupidity to do so.
I wom't be supporting any Socialist candidates then or today. Thanks deadPoops...
That genie is out of the bottle. Globalism is a reality. You can't just cut off the US from the larger world economy and expect it to perform. Technology has changed that forever. Like it or not all large US corporations will have offices all over the world. If China isn't doing well that means US companies aren't doing as well. If the US doesn't lead by example internationally it will not be able to perform at an optimal level.
I’m not talking about isolationism. I’m talking about ensuring whatever tactical moves we make are in the best strategic interests of the country’s long term health. My company is global, hell, I’m global, but the examples I use are Paris, Iran, and China. We need to keep maximum pressure on China. We need to not be part of Paris as it was a global cash giveaway to climate special interests who’d profit globally at the expense of our industry, and the Iran thing was just dumb in so many ways.
I think the globalism part of the issue is not allowing the US to pay for all other nations wish list at our expense....
So, this is a YES for you....
If there’s no substantial evidence to back up claims of voter fraud or election interference, and the Supreme Court does not take Trump’s case. Then he should concede and let there be a peaceful transition of power. No sense dragging this out w/o any other verifiable evidence.