preface: This season has been extremely hard for me to watch and some of his decisions, primarily clock management, have driven me crazy.
Do you remember Dak as a freshman/sophomore? Not much different than Fitz, but we did have a better upper class option in Russell. Now look at what he is doing. Based on his physicals, he only warranted a 4th round pick. But he is appearing to be the most ready rookie in the history of the NFL, and he is coming from a SPREAD team. Granted, we all know about his intangibles. But do you not think that we will see one of the Nick's take close the same trajectory? Do any of you remember Moulds' first year/two and what followed...I know some that view the late 90's as the glory years, but the mid 90's were highly inconsistent.
So now Mullen was inconsistent in '13 and '16. That's a lower frequency than the Kang had.
We might not repeat '14 next year, but Dan will develop. And if not, next year is the year.
ETA: lets just hope we don't pick up a tiny scatback late. Because the most glaring thing I see with '13 and '16 is Perkins = Holloway
Do you remember Dak as a freshman/sophomore? Not much different than Fitz, but we did have a better upper class option in Russell. Now look at what he is doing. Based on his physicals, he only warranted a 4th round pick. But he is appearing to be the most ready rookie in the history of the NFL, and he is coming from a SPREAD team. Granted, we all know about his intangibles. But do you not think that we will see one of the Nick's take close the same trajectory? Do any of you remember Moulds' first year/two and what followed...I know some that view the late 90's as the glory years, but the mid 90's were highly inconsistent.
So now Mullen was inconsistent in '13 and '16. That's a lower frequency than the Kang had.
We might not repeat '14 next year, but Dan will develop. And if not, next year is the year.
ETA: lets just hope we don't pick up a tiny scatback late. Because the most glaring thing I see with '13 and '16 is Perkins = Holloway
Last edited: