Wtf don’t you guys understand? It’s a totally different deal. Me as a donor might give money for a building but IF I want to give money to somebody I’ll give it to my own kids.
We’re not going to win any bidding wars against oil or tech money.
WTF don’t I understand? It’s what you don’t understand. I’m on a board on a nonprofit. I have a CPA, 2 masters degrees, and understand finance better then your simple tracked mind (which I say this because you showed above).
Let me explain simple economics to you. Contributed funding is finite. Donors budget. The mass donations charities collect tend to go toward the campaign that the charitable labeled area of greatest need. Yea their is always some sort of “building fund” and yes, people can always restrict their donations for such usage. The donors intent always has to be honored. So grumpy old men like yourself can control where their money goes.
But the money comes in from selling. If Trev wanted to push NIL, he would. He would have made that the program’s “area of greatest need” for donors, regardless if it would be via to another organization. But he didnt. He put it on facilities via promotion. So that’s where big money backed. Again, donations are finite, you give here, takes away from giving there.
Yes there’s grumpy old *** men that “don’t believe in fair pay for those that labor”. Yes Charles Comiskey would be proud. Pad the rich pockets.
And yes we can compete in NIL. We see this in many areas that Nebraska atheletics does extremely well business wise