Private vs public school

o_Hot Rock

Senior
Jan 2, 2010
1,854
776
113
It will depend on how they do it. Some schools around us have simply delayed any type of school. So their teachers have time. Nothing will be different in a month most likely, so I would expect the ones delaying are just delaying bit by bit b/c they don't want to just announce they aren't having school.

If they operate like they did in the spring, our teachers will have time. They basically just put together assignments for people to pick up or download. Certainly some work but not much. That would be very easy for a teacher to knock out with a hard day's work and then get paid to teach a small group in person.

If they require teachers to record lessons, then it will be a lot of work for a teacher to do both. Doable, but it will probably be a lot harder to find the ones willing to do it and/or we'll have to pay a little more.

If they do the "synchronous" option, then they won't be able to do both. At that point, the price of poker will go up significantly. Best case scenario at that point is probably a college student that is doing remote school. Probably won't have somebody that can manage more than our kids, so we'll probably be footing the bill ourselves at that point or at most splitting with one other family.

For what it's worth, we have good teachers and administration and the vast majority of them want to do in school teaching as far as I can tell. I am expecting us to go to school as planned but we have a lot of idiots that are making noise asking school to be postponed or mandated that it be remote (when we already have remote options for those that want it). Some people just can't be happy unless they are telling other people what to do.

My wife had to do online teaching and she spent way more time and effort this spring teaching than she did prior to the shut down. She spent hours and hours putting together those packets you mentioned and designing the material to be taught online, then many more hours and hours teaching a few kids at a time online. She worked harder than she ever did in a classroom and it was less effective. Many kids didn't have the resources others just didn't show up to the online dates. She spent hours on the phones with parents discussing each kid too get participation. You have no idea what you speak when you say, "They basically just put together assignments for people to pick up or download. Certainly some work but not much." Speak about stuff you know, this subject you do not.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,157
5,965
113
0 tests to 5 million a week in 3 months.

The government removed the requirement that the tests be tested first. They asked the companies to self verify the tests work.
Shocker, many didnt. Towns and hospitals spent millions on tests that didn't work with no recourse.

And all this is in addition to the completely false claim back in the start of March(the 5th or so) that anyone who wants a test can get one.

So add that context to your comment and it gives a more complete picture.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,157
5,965
113
It will depend on how they do it. Some schools around us have simply delayed any type of school. So their teachers have time. Nothing will be different in a month most likely, so I would expect the ones delaying are just delaying bit by bit b/c they don't want to just announce they aren't having school.

If they operate like they did in the spring, our teachers will have time. They basically just put together assignments for people to pick up or download. Certainly some work but not much. That would be very easy for a teacher to knock out with a hard day's work and then get paid to teach a small group in person.

If they require teachers to record lessons, then it will be a lot of work for a teacher to do both. Doable, but it will probably be a lot harder to find the ones willing to do it and/or we'll have to pay a little more.

If they do the "synchronous" option, then they won't be able to do both. At that point, the price of poker will go up significantly. Best case scenario at that point is probably a college student that is doing remote school. Probably won't have somebody that can manage more than our kids, so we'll probably be footing the bill ourselves at that point or at most splitting with one other family.

For what it's worth, we have good teachers and administration and the vast majority of them want to do in school teaching as far as I can tell. I am expecting us to go to school as planned but we have a lot of idiots that are making noise asking school to be postponed or mandated that it be remote (when we already have remote options for those that want it). Some people just can't be happy unless they are telling other people what to do.

Interesting. My sister is a teacher for 4th-6th graders. I am good friends with 2 other teachers in different districts. All were absurdly busy this spring with meetings, planning, and working with students remotely.

The plan this year will have them all super busy when in the classroom and just as busy if their class is forced to learn remotely due to an outbreak.



When you mention school starting later, then it will also end later. Or it will be adjusted so the required hours/days are accounted for in some way. The teachers will still work their full contracted time.
If your district is underutilized the teachers, thats a shame and its a huge missed opportunity for teacher training or for tutor and assistance time with students.
You should speak up about this since it is such an obvious missed opportunity to utilize expert resources thst are available to help kids working remotely.
 

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,435
4,932
113
My wife had to do online teaching and she spent way more time and effort this spring teaching than she did prior to the shut down. She spent hours and hours putting together those packets you mentioned and designing the material to be taught online, then many more hours and hours teaching a few kids at a time online. She worked harder than she ever did in a classroom and it was less effective. Many kids didn't have the resources others just didn't show up to the online dates. She spent hours on the phones with parents discussing each kid too get participation. You have no idea what you speak when you say, "They basically just put together assignments for people to pick up or download. Certainly some work but not much." Speak about stuff you know, this subject you do not.

Or you know, maybe, just maybe, it's possible that my kids weren't in your wife's class in the spring? I know it's a long shot. I mean, your wife probably had 30 kids in her class. What are the chances that my kids wouldn't have been in that thirty.

But if you could imagine that possibility, maybe you could also imagine the possibility that the teachers of our kids didn't do anything more than scanning in their worksheets that they would have used in class? Hell, maybe it's even possible that we are friends with our kids' teachers outside and talked with them about what they did and their frustration that it wasn't feasible for them to do an online lesson b/c they didn't have the production capability and the kids weren't at a level that they could read lessons to themselves? Maybe it's even possible that preparing for lower elementary classes is different from preparing for high school classes to be taught remotely? I don't know. I know it's a lot easier to focus on the likelihood that aliens have visited earth and we have some pieces of their aircraft, but maybe there are crazier things that are true also, like not all teachers being in the same position in the spring and not all students being in your wife's class.


ETA: Maybe it is basically impossible to record lessons and have time to do in person teaching. I was thinking that for our teachers that have been doing it for a while, they could record four hours of lessons in 6 hours. But that probably is ridiculously optimist now that I think about it. Even if all they did was record how they normally talk in class, they'd probably have more than 2 hours of prep and editing and retakes, etc, so that may not even be doable in 40 hours, and would probably be more timeconsuming than just the synchronous option.
 
Last edited:

paindonthurt_

All-Conference
Jun 27, 2009
9,528
2,046
113
Add this context to your point, people were screaming for more tests!
Why aren’t we testing more?

Didn’t we get a lot of tests from China?