I would imagine this kind of drop (lost $$$$) if repeated again next season, will finally cause a shakeup in the current format. Regardless of the role corona may be playing. Lost $$$$ is lost $$$$.
Last edited:
Maybe our players should get better by working hard so they can be in the playoffs instead of opting out. Cant blame Alabama, Ohio state, Clemson. Not their faults. It’s not like when saban and dabo took over their schools they were having a bunch of success before them. Maybe our staff should figure it out to be a well oiled machine like those schools so top players want to play there.
Yes the playoffs may need to be extended, but you will still see those same teams in the end unless some other teams decide to get better.
I didn’t realize the bowl game down in Shreveport was part of the playoffs.
On the flip side, if you have more teams eligible then possibly you will have the talent spread around and will more teams playing at a higher level. Bring some value into winning a conference championship, by inviting conference champions only. If you don't win your conference you stay home period.Looks like the data is telling us there are only about 2 or 3 teams a year good enough to win a title so I know what we should do...invite nore teams!!! Wait, what? We want to invite even less deserving teams who would get waxed by even bigger margins in an attempt to gain viewers? I don't see any holes in that plan.
This was just a funky year, everything was down....toss it aside and see what happens next year before we ovet react and overhaul the entire system.
Point is those programs get better by playing. Not opting out. But let’s complain and make rules so Alabama can’t win as much. We are told how important bowl games are to getting better and then we opt out. So hence why those schools get better since they don’t opt outI didn’t realize the bowl game down in Shreveport was part of the playoffs.
On the flip side, if you have more teams eligible then possibly you will have the talent spread around and will more teams playing at a higher level. Bring some value into winning a conference championship, by inviting conference champions only. If you don't win your conference you stay home period.
I doubt the average CFB fan can even tell you who won the Pac 12 or what their record was this year....and they would have gotten a beat down by 3/4 playoff teams this year. Saturating a product with some more crappy product trying to drive ratings just doesn't make sense to me.
this is not the model of the future, but the model of today.The model of the future is to over sign, if kids underperform they're asked to move on, just like a professional league. When other teams fully embrace this modus operandi then perhaps we'll see more parity in the playoff system.
Nailed itthis is not the model of the future, but the model of today.
and, it's not like teams are willfully ignoring it. the SEC/ACC don't guarantee scholarships for 4 years, allowing for this kind of flexibility, while the B1G does guarantee scholarships for 4 years, therefore putting programs, 11 of which have already made it clear they don't care about football, in an expensive predicament when trying to maintain the 85 while playing river boat three card monty with discarded talent.
I just tried to remember who those other 8 teams were. I got seven. The 8th kinda blew my mind?I read that in the 7 years of the playoff, there have been, of course, 28 teams selected.
20 of the 28 playoff spots have gone to just four schools - Bama, Clemson, OSU, and OU.
I just tried to remember who those other 8 teams were. I got seven. The 8th kinda blew my mind?
washington, oregon, notre dame (x2), mich st, florida st, LSUSpill it!!!!
Joel Klatt from fox puts it best. Its become a cycle of 3 schools getting all the best players because they are in the playoffs and all the best players going to 3 schools because they want to play in the playoffs. By expanding the playoffs more teams have a chance at having something to recruit to. Clemson Bama and OSU (LSU Oregon and Georgia close behind) have recruiting monopolies and adding more teams breaks that upLooks like the data is telling us there are only about 2 or 3 teams a year good enough to win a title so I know what we should do...invite nore teams!!! Wait, what? We want to invite even less deserving teams who would get waxed by even bigger margins in an attempt to gain viewers? I don't see any holes in that plan.
This was just a funky year, everything was down....toss it aside and see what happens next year before we ovet react and overhaul the entire system.
Joel Klatt from fox puts it best. Its become a cycle of 3 schools getting all the best players because they are in the playoffs and all the best players going to 3 schools because they want to play in the playoffs. By expanding the playoffs more teams have a chance at having something to recruit to. Clemson Bama and OSU (LSU Oregon and Georgia close behind) have recruiting monopolies and adding more teams breaks that up
It’s called babes and bucksI love Klatt...but he is wrong on this. Kids being woo'd by Bama and Clemson are still going to want to go to Bama and Clemson regardless of the playoff format.
Washington is who I forgot about. Michigan State is a real weird one tooForgot about Washington...never would guessed that one.
Washington is who I forgot about. Michigan State is a real weird one too
plThe dropped the scholarship number down to 85 so it supposed to make more teams competitive, we keep hearing college football has more parity, my question is for whom did it help? imo all the 85 limits did was help the southern schools Alabama continues to over sign each recruiting cycle and the Powers to be say that’s ok but most other conferences play by the rules.
yes, I remember it well. I guess they made it into the playoff a little bit by default, but MSU had no business playing against Alabama that year... 38-0.Michigan state scored on a 4th and goal with 27 seconds left in the game to beat an undefeated Iowa in the big ten championship game -- if they do not score you have an undefeated Iowa team playing in the college football playoffs instead of MSU
side note -- a Mike Riley led Neb team beat that michigan state team earlier in the year
who was the last Neb coach to beat team that finished the conference championship season ahead of bowl games ranked in the top 3
Saban can put on that BS all he wants. Dude is and always has been a prick. That little leprechaun . Nah. Pop is the worst, pompous, I’ll tell you the right way to think, I’m right on every topic I engage and you wrong if not on that side. Dudes a douche as well. JMHOcall me crazy, but I have started to like Alabama. They are incredible! Saban is just so darn matter-of-fact that its hard to hate on him anymore. Kinda like Popovich and the Spurs and Brady/Belicheck. After hating them for so long I started to like them.
Lincoln has some good looking girls too. It makes a huge difference in perception when girls can wear mini skirts and halter tops year round in the south vs jeans and a jacket most of the school year here. We do need to get a baton twirling team though, and if they have to wear a one-piece outfit in 20 degree weather to help recruiting, then so be it.The average Clemson, Bama, OSU coed is a 10 in Lincoln.
Get these girls some fit bits and a university stylist