Pitt & Narduzzi

[Panthergrowl13]

One last thing. I agree with others ITT that just because he was a good DC doesn't automatically make him a good HC. Look at Muschamp. In addition, I find it odd that it took him so long to actually become one and he had to settle for PITT. It's certainly not the MAC but it's not a dream jov either.

I believe Narduzzi will work out well as a Head Coach. By December it will become more definitive.

Also, I think the jury is still out on James Franklin's at Penn State.

Last Year he coached Penn State to a 7-6 season, but I think Hackenburg (sp) regressed significantly as a QB (IMO).

Rutgers coach Flood(paid significantly less than Franklin) attained a better record (8-5) in their 1st year in the B1G.



HAIL TO PITT!!!!

 

[KJB32812]

I believe Narduzzi will work out well as a Head Coach. By December it will become more definitive.

Also, I think the jury is still out on James Franklin's at Penn State.

Last Year he coached Penn State to a 7-6 season, but I think Hackenburg (sp) regressed significantly as a QB (IMO).

Rutgers coach Flood(paid significantly less than Franklin) attained a better record (8-5) in their 1st year in the B1G.



HAIL TO PITT!!!!

Of course the jury is still out on Franklin. The OL was a problem. Funny how people point at 5he offense but never comment on the improvements made on the defensive side of the ball. Under Obrien the defense was a bumbling mess led, in year 2, by a person with absolutely no clue.