pretty interesting. as these live rights continue to skyrocket, more and more deep-pocketed companies are throwing their hat in the ring.
assuming rights go to highest bidder, regardless of it being a streaming company or traditional broadcasting company, more money is usually not a bad thing.Meh.....it was kinda nice to tune into a game late Saturday if they were the only game on TV but I can live without 'em. Don't think this will help them for recruiting though. In fact if I'm understanding you correctly...it will be very bad for that.
assuming rights go to highest bidder, regardless of it being a streaming company or traditional broadcasting company, more money is usually not a bad thing.
I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing there are legions more subscribers to Apple+ than to Versus.More money is good but not being on the traditional broadcast networks would be bad for recruiting exposure and their brand in general. Has a second-rate feel and forces fans to subscribe to a particular service.
The NHL leaving ESPN for the Versus Network serves as a model. The contract was more lucrative but suddenly hockey was on channel 80-something (formerly the Outdoor Life Network) instead of ABC/ESPN/ESPN2.
At that point, the NHL basically waived the white flag on trying to attract casual fans in America. The Pac-12 would risk putting themselves even further behind among the Power 5.
I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing there are legions more subscribers to Apple+ than to Versus.
traditional broadcast networks don't necessarily have the clout they used to.
I wouldn't be surprised if this is posturing, but also wouldn't be surprised to see streaming services driving these rights prices up higher and higher every time contracts are due.
frankly, amazon/apple/facebook would be stupid not to bid for every P5 contract moving forward.
people will come, Ray. people will most definitely come.