OT: OSB at it again

dorndawg

All-American
Sep 10, 2012
8,849
9,579
113
Invoking force majeure on supply and demand is tricky, but it's not really hard to invoke it on supply chain disruptions. If they include a force majeure clause in the contract, it probably specifically lists supply chain disruptions. Difficult line to draw when material is available but at insane prices, but with pandemic induced closures up and down the supply chain, I'd probably rather be the one claiming force majeure if I had to just pick who was most likely to win.

Probably the biggest thing is like you say, they probably can't afford to stop building either. They need to keep building, but at a higher price, and if you say "force majeure, but I will complete the contract if you pay me an extra 15%", you are hurting your position.

I have talked to two people who made a deposit with a builder and the builder is just sitting on it and keeps telling them they are about to start, but it's been going on months now with no work being done. So they are stuck in rentals and the builder is holding a good chunk of money that they could use as a down payment on a house. I'm guessing that's not an uncommon tactic either, but I suspect they started it thinking they just had to wait out a month or two, and now there is no end in site, so delaying may not help them.


Builders trying to wait out last year's prices is what led to this year's prices. Anyone looking to do a project with wood in the next 6 months, my advice is buy now.
 
Last edited:

Dawgsnsaints

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2012
379
0
0
It will be a roller coaster, our plywood order files are two months out. I have never witnessed that much of a lag.
 

SheltonChoked

Redshirt
Feb 27, 2008
1,786
0
0
Sorry to keep posting this, but it's getting to be so ridiculous, that I cannot keep from sharing. I'm not even going to get into lumber...

For simplicity sake, a normal price for 7/16 OSB sheathing is $10 per sheet wholesale or $320/msf (1000 square feet.) As if this week it's selling for $70 per sheet wholesale. To put that into perspective, if normal gasoline price is $2.50/ gallon, this is like $17.50 per gallon gasoline.

Chemical plants went offline for weeks in Texas and the mills can't get the resins. My builder has been waiting for a month on my framing package. If a hurricane hits the coast, the government will have to get involved. It's the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen in the building industry.

View attachment 20083

All because Texans get "cheaper Electricity". (FYI it's higher than the average price in Louisiana, a little lower than AL or MS)
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
They are, but most don't have the balance sheet to lose money on 80 homes, or even just break even on 80 homes. And they'd have a pretty solid force majeure claim if they wanted to push it. Yours may be different than the type of tract home builders we have, who all push for 200 to 300 homes per year. If they are only doing 80, they may be a higher quality company.

Another thing that may be different is the contract you have. You'd be amazed at the contracts that tract home builders down here can get away with. They have basically no specs, just a layout. So there are a lot of opportunities to cut corners if they need to claw back some of the costs. But that only helps the ones that are not already taking the lowest possible price without regard to quality.

That's true for normal swings. I just don't know that prices are coming down in the next 18 months, and I'm not sure how many of them are positioned to ride something like that out.

They are not losing money on all of those homes, they are just losing profit. My builder has raised the base price of my model in my development 37% since I contracted in September and there is now a huge waiting list. They will be just fine. As much as materials have gone up, labor and land are still the bulk of single family home costs and they have increased much slower than lumber.

As for force majeure, good luck. It was September when we signed the Purchase Sale Agreement. Lumber was at a record high then and we were in the middle of the pandemic. It's a business decision not to pre buy materials or put a POD (price on delivery) or price escalation clause in the contract. I put 10% down and have been patiently biding my time. If they make that argument now, all of the buyers contracted at the new higher prices would be able to do the same when the market corrects later this year.

I have been around this business for a long time with the biggest builders in the world. If force majeure were applied to my build, or anyone else right now, it would open the door to every home buyer that contracted on a house in the past right before material prices tanked to come after a builder. Live by the sword, die by the sword. Builders are getting squeezed this spring and summer, but the worm will turn. Lumber and OSB will correct and be 1/2 to 1/3rd if the current prices within a year. We are reaching labor capacity issues and material production will blow past labor soon enough.

While I am not a lawyer, I still feel 100% confident that every builder worth a lick knows price escalation clauses exist and could easily choose to put them in contracts. They can be lumped in with force majeure. In my particular case, the word force majeure doesn't even appear in the contract. Acts of God does once, but it's entirely about delays in closing.
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
Invoking force majeure on supply and demand is tricky, but it's not really hard to invoke it on supply chain disruptions. If they include a force majeure clause in the contract, it probably specifically lists supply chain disruptions. Difficult line to draw when material is available but at insane prices, but with pandemic induced closures up and down the supply chain, I'd probably rather be the one claiming force majeure if I had to just pick who was most likely to win.

Probably the biggest thing is like you say, they probably can't afford to stop building either. They need to keep building, but at a higher price, and if you say "force majeure, but I will complete the contract if you pay me an extra 15%", you are hurting your position.

I have talked to two people who made a deposit with a builder and the builder is just sitting on it and keeps telling them they are about to start, but it's been going on months now with no work being done. So they are stuck in rentals and the builder is holding a good chunk of money that they could use as a down payment on a house. I'm guessing that's not an uncommon tactic either, but I suspect they started it thinking they just had to wait out a month or two, and now there is no end in site, so delaying may not help them.

I replied to a different post, this one is closer to accurate. I think builders have a case on delays, but not on prices unless they have a specific price escalation clause. Buyers probably also have a case at a certain point in delays when it it becomes obvious the builder is holding out for price decreases in materials.
 

Russ Wheeler

Redshirt
Aug 3, 2020
2,430
0
0
So.....any advice on where this ends? Will prices return? Just like before, I can see a situation where all these new frantic homebuyers end up in a world of trouble because, while they have low interest rates, they have incredibly high mortgage balances that they can't afford. Someone also told me that the bank is not really being strict or foreclosures or missed payments or something like that too. I would also imagine once all this COVID crap moves on, shortages and labor will be normal again, stabilizing prices and then all these houses will be super over-valued, which will end up making these frantic homebuyers upside down in addition to having huge mortgages they can't afford. This all obviously will create another real buying opportunity.

Am I anywhere near reality here?
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
A friend sent me a market update on lumber this morning. Here are some highlights:

*This was the busiest week of the year in lumber markets.
*Mills sold everything they offered.
Wholesalers were shut out of the market.
*Distributors were scrambling to cover customer needs.
*Prices skyrocketed.
*Order files pushed out several weeks.
*SYP mills are selling into regions that never use it because it's cheaper than other species.
*Trucking companies are charging $5-6 per mile in some lanes.
*Mills are still having to shutter lines for a week or two with Covid issues because employees are still spreading it to each other.
*SPF is pushed out to July quotes.
*Finger jointed studs are harder to find than kryptonite.
*It's going to be a long spring and early summer.
 

DoggieDaddy13

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2017
3,566
1,957
113
Log prices are going to stay depressed. This goes back decades, but many wood products have replaced by other materials:

Plywood and OSB sheathing replaced by thermoply.
Wood studs replaced by steel studs.
Wood decking replaced by composite.
Siding and trim replaced by fiber cement.
Solid section lumber replaced by engineered wood.

All of this has taken off in the last 20-30 years at the same time as everyone (particularly in the South) started using proper forest management to increase growth rates and mill technology increased yields.

As of right now, there is more log supply than mill capacity. The only way the dynamic will change is if more mills are built because of sustained, long term demand. It will take years to build a new ODB mill, right now I now of one that is coming online in the fall. The bigger current issue is a like of resins because of the chemical plants that went offline in the February freeze.

Southern Timber is in the same boat, maybe even a worse boat, than natural gas was 15 years ago. Once we started fracking, gas supply increased at a much faster rate than demand. At the same time, gas fired electricity generation was replaced by wind energy.

What makes timber even worse is if everyone sits in it because of depressed prices, it just keeps growing and when prices do start to increase the supply has increased just as much if not more...

It's a ****** situation, but there is just way more supply than capacity at this point.

Thank you for this explanation. It's not exactly what someone looking to build wants to read, but clear. Seems like we'd have more mills. I know there have been lots of closures. Were they able to do more with less at one time? And was resin only produced at chemical plants in Texas?
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
So.....any advice on where this ends? Will prices return? Just like before, I can see a situation where all these new frantic homebuyers end up in a world of trouble because, while they have low interest rates, they have incredibly high mortgage balances that they can't afford. Someone also told me that the bank is not really being strict or foreclosures or missed payments or something like that too. I would also imagine once all this COVID crap moves on, shortages and labor will be normal again, stabilizing prices and then all these houses will be super over-valued, which will end up making these frantic homebuyers upside down in addition to having huge mortgages they can't afford. This all obviously will create another real buying opportunity.

Am I anywhere near reality here?

I have put some thought into this and there are some nuggets in your post that make sense. Here's my take.

Traditionally, buying a new construction house is like buying a new car. You actually pay a premium for a "new home smell" and if you sold it within a year or two you would lose 5-10% because a buyer could likely get there own home built in the same neighborhood with their personal choices.... That is not the case today. But at some point, demand and supply will hit a peak where if you buy, your *** as toast. Unlike 2007-08, I think it will be very market specific on when that is.

We focus too much on interest rates with home affordability. Down payment is usually a bigger factor. Money printing will keep bank accounts flush as ever for a while and inflation means higher wages. Also, existing home owners are sitting on massive equity. Remember, at 20% down, you are levering your down payment 5-1. So a $20k down payment increases affordability by $100k.

Material price decreases will happen, but labor increases and land increases will also come along. It could end up being a wash.

Again, unlike 2007-08, this will not be a national issue. Some markets have so much demand it will take years or decades to fulfill. Albuquerque, Boise, Denver, and Seattle are tied for the lowest inventory in the country. Less than 3 weeks. That's a sign of long-term appreciation in house prices. Other places are tight, but not nearly as much so. Memphis, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Indianapolis... Those places are in the short squeeze, but it likely won't last. I mean who's packing up for Indy?
 

dorndawg

All-American
Sep 10, 2012
8,849
9,579
113
I have put some thought into this and there are some nuggets in your post that make sense. Here's my take.

Traditionally, buying a new construction house is like buying a new car. You actually pay a premium for a "new home smell" and if you sold it within a year or two you would lose 5-10% because a buyer could likely get there own home built in the same neighborhood with their personal choices.... That is not the case today. But at some point, demand and supply will hit a peak where if you buy, your *** as toast. Unlike 2007-08, I think it will be very market specific on when that is.

We focus too much on interest rates with home affordability. Down payment is usually a bigger factor. Money printing will keep bank accounts flush as ever for a while and inflation means higher wages. Also, existing home owners are sitting on massive equity. Remember, at 20% down, you are levering your down payment 5-1. So a $20k down payment increases affordability by $100k.

Material price decreases will happen, but labor increases and land increases will also come along. It could end up being a wash.

Again, unlike 2007-08, this will not be a national issue. Some markets have so much demand it will take years or decades to fulfill. Albuquerque, Boise, Denver, and Seattle are tied for the lowest inventory in the country. Less than 3 weeks. That's a sign of long-term appreciation in house prices. Other places are tight, but not nearly as much so. Memphis, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Indianapolis... Those places are in the short squeeze, but it likely won't last. I mean who's packing up for Indy?


Agree with all this, and there is a MASSIVE single family home shortage. I've seen that shortage estimated at 2.5 million. Add to that existing problem, Millennials are an enormous age cohort & coming into peak home buying years.

 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,243
6,076
113
Again, unlike 2007-08, this will not be a national issue. Some markets have so much demand it will take years or decades to fulfill. Albuquerque, Boise, Denver, and Seattle are tied for the lowest inventory in the country. Less than 3 weeks. That's a sign of long-term appreciation in house prices. Other places are tight, but not nearly as much so. Memphis, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, Indianapolis... Those places are in the short squeeze, but it likely won't last. I mean who's packing up for Indy?

Indy Metro has grown by 50% over the last 20 years. Im not defending Indy, I have no idea why its popular, but it is.
View attachment 20085





The Des Moines metro has grown 50% this century- I get it, its a flyover ag state who wants to live here.
Solid public schools with strong achievement tests, stable low unemployment, low cost of living, etc. It isnt glamorous, but its steady.
View attachment 20086



I think there are a lot of these spots around the country- not glamorous, but solid and steady. There is a ton of demand as a result and new construction cant keep up.
 

Uncle Ruckus

All-American
Apr 1, 2011
14,735
5,809
113
I'm not market expert, but the low interest rates aren't going to be around for a while considering how things are going. I am the gc for our build, so I can't lock in my mortgage until my construction loan is complete. The sooner I get done, the lower the rate will still hopefully be. Over a 30-year fixed rate, I will save more money on interest than if I wait for the price of materials to lower. Also, I really want/need to get into our dream home soon. I have shared here before that my wife has cancer. Hopefully she will outlive me, but you never know. Due to her medical issues, we are not able to have children so we will adopt. Where we live now, with two large inside dogs wouldn't be ideal for a baby, so the sooner we can get into our home, the sooner we can adopt. We live in central Hancock county. Not in a flood area, but close enough to the water. Land and housing prices are insane right now. Existing home prices for what we are building for don't even compare. We'd be buying a 15-year old home that is much smaller, and not nearly as nice for what we are building for the same price with little to no land. What we are building on has plenty of land, plenty of privacy and an almost completed pond. The other way I am looking at it is what is the house worth to me? It's invaluable. I don't ever intend of selling, the value will only go up, and it's exactly what we want, so as long as I can afford it, I'm good with it.
 

Russ Wheeler

Redshirt
Aug 3, 2020
2,430
0
0
Indy Metro has grown by 50% over the last 20 years. Im not defending Indy, I have no idea why its popular, but it is.
View attachment 20085





The Des Moines metro has grown 50% this century- I get it, its a flyover ag state who wants to live here.
Solid public schools with strong achievement tests, stable low unemployment, low cost of living, etc. It isnt glamorous, but its steady.
View attachment 20086



I think there are a lot of these spots around the country- not glamorous, but solid and steady. There is a ton of demand as a result and new construction cant keep up.
Is that good? The Gulfport-Biloxi metro area grew by 60% in the same time period, and that was with Katrina. Austin is pretty much the standard, and they've grown by 78%.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
14,584
5,066
113
I replied to a different post, this one is closer to accurate. I think builders have a case on delays, but not on prices unless they have a specific price escalation clause. Buyers probably also have a case at a certain point in delays when it it becomes obvious the builder is holding out for price decreases in materials.

One thing I was not taking into account is that production builders shouldn't have much exposure compared to traditional builders. If you are building on a lot you already have prepped and ready, and you are basically using your own crews, and you have financing partnerships lined up, and you're building a home you have already built a hundred times so you know exactly what lumber you need, you can get hit pretty good, but with the profit built in, if that's your only problem, you're right, it's not going to wipe you out. Of course if a builder is taking deposits on homes it can't start for another three months, the calculation starts to look different.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
14,584
5,066
113
Indy Metro has grown by 50% over the last 20 years. Im not defending Indy, I have no idea why its popular, but it is.
View attachment 20085





The Des Moines metro has grown 50% this century- I get it, its a flyover ag state who wants to live here.
Solid public schools with strong achievement tests, stable low unemployment, low cost of living, etc. It isnt glamorous, but its steady.
View attachment 20086



I think there are a lot of these spots around the country- not glamorous, but solid and steady. There is a ton of demand as a result and new construction cant keep up.

How much of that is driven by depopulation of the surrounding areas I wonder? I think Indianapolis is probably a pretty strong metropolitan area on its own, but I assume it's probably picking up population from rural parts of the state that are depopulating. Hell, the Jackson MSA is growing slowly but steadily, but I think it's mainly just attracting people from places like the Delta. I suspect a place like Indianapolis is probably picking up residents from rural areas in its state and also picking up residents from people fleeing larger, more dysfunctional cities like Chicago.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
14,584
5,066
113
Is that good? The Gulfport-Biloxi metro area grew by 60% in the same time period, and that was with Katrina. Austin is pretty much the standard, and they've grown by 78%.

Man, gulfport biloxi's data looks funky. Slow growth before Katrina, depopulation, slow growth, a massive spike from 2009 to 2010, and then slow growth. I'm guessing there have to be some data issues there. Maybe they increased the size of teh MSA?

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BLXPOP

ETA: Missed the obvious that 2010 was a census year, so maybe they just undercounted every year and then the census picked up a lot of population they had been missing.

Jackson MSA has the same spike:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JASPOP
 

horshack.sixpack

All-American
Oct 30, 2012
11,472
8,421
113
I think that COVID introduced work anywhere attitude could be like the transfer portal. That kind of mobility will mean that metropolitan areas will have to stay on their game to keep people. Piss me off with poor services, high taxes or lack of playing time and I'm moving.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,243
6,076
113
Is that good? The Gulfport-Biloxi metro area grew by 60% in the same time period, and that was with Katrina. Austin is pretty much the standard, and they've grown by 78%.

This century...
Chicago metro has grown by 6.8%.
NYC metro has grown by 5.9%.
Detroit metro has shrunk by 11.4%.
San Francisco metro has grown by 3.5%.
Seattle metro has grown by 25%.


Im not sure if 50% growth is 'good' or not.

My point was that Indianapolis has grown a lot in the last 2 decades and I think there are a lot of similar metros that dont sound appealing at first, but end up looking pretty good after research.


As for Biloxi- ok good to know that metro has grown a lot. The high growth there doesnt change the point I was making.
Its interesting that Biloxi as a city has gotten smaller in the last 20 years. There are fewer residents in Biloxi now than in 2000. So clearly all around Biloxi has grown a bunch.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BLXPOP
It looks like the GBP MSA grew slowly for a handful of years, then crashed because of Katrina for a handful of years, then spiked, and has barely grown in the last decade.
66% growth overall for the MSA this century, but only 7.2% growth over the last decade.
Thats a cool example- its a really wild growth pattern.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,243
6,076
113
How much of that is driven by depopulation of the surrounding areas I wonder? I think Indianapolis is probably a pretty strong metropolitan area on its own, but I assume it's probably picking up population from rural parts of the state that are depopulating. Hell, the Jackson MSA is growing slowly but steadily, but I think it's mainly just attracting people from places like the Delta. I suspect a place like Indianapolis is probably picking up residents from rural areas in its state and also picking up residents from people fleeing larger, more dysfunctional cities like Chicago.

This is a really good point- metro growth due to regional flight.
Ill disagree with the Chicago comment since even if its dysfunctional as a city, the metro has grown 7% this century. Tough to say people are fleeing since its mostly built up and growth is naturally slower in developed metros.

In Indiana, rural counties have grown at 2% while metros have grown at 9%.

Between 2010 and 2020, 69 of Iowa's 99 counties lost population. This century, the state population has grown by 10.5%. So clearly a lot of the metro growth is coming from some cannibalism of the rural areas.
 

Cooterpoot

Redshirt
Aug 29, 2012
4,239
2
0
Austin TX is insanity. So are 2nd home areas like FL, Gatlinburg, NC etc. Bidding wars for properties like I've never seen.
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
Agree with all this, and there is a MASSIVE single family home shortage. I've seen that shortage estimated at 2.5 million. Add to that existing problem, Millennials are an enormous age cohort & coming into peak home buying years.


The thought 10-12 years ago was that 2020 would be the year boomers retire en masse and start selling their 4 bedroom homes and moving to Del Webb communities. I actually wrote an article in a trade mag about the percentage of lumber industry folks alone expected to retire i
around 2020. Well, they are somewhat retiring, but they have not started downsizing yet... And millennials are getting the raw end of the deal for sure.

Boomers screw millennials again.***
 

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
How do you financial experts see housing prices going over the next few years? There's a huge crunch where I'm living now with people from Seattle and California swarming in and almost nothing is being built.

Buy ASAP Kissinger. Your area is going to explode for years from the Portland and CA exodus.
 

ZombieKissinger

All-American
May 29, 2013
5,088
8,488
113
We moved here last week and are renting for now, but I think we'll be ready put an offer on something this fall. Actually stopped through Boise for a night on the way up and was really impressed with the downtown. Ate at Alavita and got drinks nearby afterward
 
Last edited:

Jeffreauxdawg

All-American
Dec 15, 2017
8,871
7,935
113
Boise downtown is like the world's biggest ski town. Pretty neat. Was Alavita good? So far, good here has been terrible.

Look forward to heading up your direction soon. We may try to hit Silverwood theme park later this summer with the kiddos. I want to play a little golf and check out Hells Canyon too.

I will hit you up when we start making any plans.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
14,584
5,066
113
This is a really good point- metro growth due to regional flight.
Ill disagree with the Chicago comment since even if its dysfunctional as a city, the metro has grown 7% this century. Tough to say people are fleeing since its mostly built up and growth is naturally slower in developed metros.

In Indiana, rural counties have grown at 2% while metros have grown at 9%.

Between 2010 and 2020, 69 of Iowa's 99 counties lost population. This century, the state population has grown by 10.5%. So clearly a lot of the metro growth is coming from some cannibalism of the rural areas.


Not sure if this is the same data set, but it looks from here like the US has grown by 18.2% this century.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/population-growth-rate


Doesn't really argue against your point, as like you said, heavily developed MSA's like Chicago would presumably see smaller percentage growth, it just raised the question of what kind of growth is "good" over this century for the US. So 50% by Indianapolis would certainly be good. Not sure how 7% for a developed MSA like Chicago should be viewed. I'd be interested to know if CHicago MSA has been growing slower than its birth rate. No clue where to get that info though.
 

ZombieKissinger

All-American
May 29, 2013
5,088
8,488
113
Sounds good. Yeah, we had a nice time at Alavita. Food we got was pretty good, and they had a cool cocktail list. We're both about to start work and will have to cover some weekends, but we should be in the area otherwise. Looking forward to doing some exploring