OT: Need advice for cool NCAA tourney game

SkilletHead2

All-American
Sep 30, 2005
24,499
9,409
113
OK guys. Need help with neat NCAA tourney game. I won last year by a lot and need to display this year that last year wasn't a fluke.

Here's the game: You pick 10 teams in the tourney. Any 10 you want. Each time your team wins, you get the number of points of the team's seed. Thus, if you pick a 12, and it wins twice and then loses, you get 24 points. I won last year with 178 points and next best was like 125 (I got super lucky). (If two guys pick exactly the same 10 teams, first man in gets the slate and other guy has to change at least one team.)

So you don't want to pick a #1 seed, as they max out at 6 points even if they win the whole thing. What you want is underdogs! Teams that will substantially outplay their seed.

So what do you think? Who should I take?
 

WJLeggett

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2005
1,058
129
0
It sounds like this format is very high on risk/reward.

Some teams that could win a few games from lower seeds in my opinion:
Ohio St, NC State, Northern Iowa, Wichita St, Michigan St, Providence.

I don't know if I would take them all and I won't even take all of them is a straight pool but I do think there is value in these teams.
 

WJLeggett

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2005
1,058
129
0
I could see taking a Kentucky as a "sure" 4 or 5 points to offset the couple of zeros you are likely to get. But no more than one or two of those types.
 

SkilletHead2

All-American
Sep 30, 2005
24,499
9,409
113
With 10 teams, you need an expected value for your picks of at least about a 13 or 14 to be competitive. That means a 7 that wins two, or three twelves who end up maybe winning a total of three games. It ain't easy, but with 30 or 40 guys playing, if you play it safe, you're sure to end up out of the money.

What I need are teams that are seeded too low for their value, and that have seedings of 3 or worse. Last year I hit gold on two or three really low seeds and walked away with it all.

So who really got a crap rating that was lower than it should be?
 

RutgersJoe

Freshman
Mar 9, 2012
1,070
95
0
I am no expert, but at a glance for this pool I like S.F. Austin (12), SMU (6), Davidson (10), Ohio State (10), and UNC (4)
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Originally posted by RutgersJoe:
I am no expert, but at a glance for this pool I like S.F. Austin (12), SMU (6), Davidson (10), Ohio State (10), and UNC (4)
I actually like Harvard as #13 and can see them getting to Final 16.
 

SkilletHead2

All-American
Sep 30, 2005
24,499
9,409
113
Excellent help here guys! I'll be making my picks probably tonight (New Zealand time).
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Basketball Analytical look Rutgers Women's Basketball opening the season with a 31-point win
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
  3. 03 The Knight Report The Knight Report - Ask The Experts Chat: November 4th Edition
  4. 04 The Knight Report Basketball How to watch Rutgers / La Salle; Pregame Info, More: Gameday Central
  5. 05 The Knight Report Three Rutgers Basketball Commits Ranked Among Nation's Top 150 Prospects