In my opinion, they’re trying to hype a narrative which they’ve been failing at connecting and seemingly still failing to connect. The narrative is that Brian Sicknick was murdered by a rabid hoard of Trumpian insurrectionists. First, it was because he was attacked with a fire extinguisher. Then, that narrative collapsed when the ME said he didn’t die of complications from blunt force trauma.
Now, they’re labeling it as some random chemical agent. As if it was a anthrax or some ****. It was bear spray from everything I’ve read. Basically, the same spray Antifa and BLM have also been using on police. And the same general kind of chemical agent police use in crowd control. They still haven’t connected his death is as a direct result of that. Look how they’re wording the article. They’re trying to infer it. If that was the cause of death, these guys would be charged with at a minimum, manslaughter.
They don’t even list the 9 charges that were filed in the articles I read. The closest I found was some assault stuff. Not what you’d be charged with for murdering a police officer.
It’s part of a larger crafted narrative and propaganda action and its pretty transparent to anyone following the story with an objective mind. It all started with labeling them as insurrectionists. Meanwhile, we had other federal building assaulted for months, and years. Even this weekend. Those weren’t insurrectionists though. This is a crafted narrative to try and bludgeon Trump supporters.