If you don’t think Zelenskyy is living the high life from our hard money then you’re delusional. Lambs to the slaughter
OT: ext...
- Thread starter Jaemekon
- Start date
Waffles, pizza, & croissants? Lots of carbs on that table.Is this a center piece or a side piece?
Why are you against women’s rights? She chose a post-birth abortion bro. Stop it with your patriarchy!
Last edited:
If you don’t think the social media posts that you take for gospel are the product of Russian disinformation you are clueless. The lambs to the slaughter are Russian troops, drafted from prisons, poverty stricken small towns, and the like.
Even the GOP majority leader, agrees with the value of reducing Russian military capabilities, without costing us a single American life.
If you're scared of Russia in 2024 you never matured from the 1950s-80s.
Disinformation is such a joke to get the sheep clutching their pearls. And you fall for it over and over.
First of all, I’m not the one who’s afraid of Russia, you guys are. Ukraine could virtually destroy the Russian army if we gave them what they need.
Second, You take Breitbart, Newsmax, Epoch times, Tucker Carlson podcasts, Alex Jones, Facebook, Twitter and other sites Easily susceptible to hacking by Russian bots As gospel truth.
I take the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, primary medical journal sources as Being closer to the truth. And I’m the one who’s falling for Disinformation.
You have me again.
"Virtually"
Lookout guys, we have a main stream media follower here, he'll show ya the error of your ways!
Better main stream media, than some Russian nerd sitting in his mothers basement in Moscow spitting out stories that you gobble up. And since when did the wall street journal qualify as some bastion of libtard news that you discount?
Might want to double check your sources on this “evidence”.
I don’t get this. Do you actually believe this or are you just jacking around with people who don’t see things exactly the way you do?
So it is in fact real.
The evidence is the content not sure why it's so difficult for you to understand that.
Most people have become numb to the garbage, but they're still able to recognize it when it's called out. You on the other hand...
With all due respect, you’re being a bully, I may be a know it all which I apologize for, but the truth is the truth. The articles were different because they occurred at different times, and were modified to reflect An ongoing story (And yes, Snopes had to retract some articles, but not this one right?, And it was because of plagiarism, which is not distorting the truth, but copying somebody else’s text and saying that you wrote it):
“However, these opposing headline editions were not distributed to different political or geographic markets, nor were they intended to influence voters.”
“Colleen Schwartz, the Vice President of Communications at The Wall Street Journal, confirmed to us that these editions were printed at different times, not in different markets. The edition on the left was published after Trump met with Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto early in the day (and referenced the seemingly cooperative tone of their discussion), and the edition on the right was published after Trump delivered a speech on immigration later in the day (and referenced Trump's reasserting his stance that he would force Mexico to pay for the building of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border)
So perhaps waiting until after the meeting to determine Trump’s stance would have been a wiser course. That way you don’t look like a moron by writing contradictory articles within a very short period of time.
Good point. Deadlines may make you get your work done, but they also cause you to make mistakes when you are in a hurry.
Ukrainians have already revealed how weak and screwed up the Russian army is. There is a Realpolitik argument for not helping Ukraine, that maybe we could suck up to Russia and counterbalance Chinese power and influence.
But millions of people in Ukraine would suffer more than they are now, and would we improve China’s behavior? Or just encourage them to invade Taiwan because We would be showing China that when push comes to shove we’ll always allow the bigger Country to do what they want, no matter how awful they are.
That isn’t a mistake. That is someone pushing an agenda then having to backtrack.
So how many Ukrainians and Russians have to die before the US totally backs one over the other? Playing in the middle like this does nothing for those on either side of the discussion.
If you think China is not invading Taiwan because anyone is playing nice with Russia you are delusional. If/ when Biden wins re-election, the Chinese will invade within a year. That is the weakness they are preying on.
If Trump wins reelection, how much do you think he will make out of allowing China to invade Taiwan?
That’s why I wanted Haley to win the nomination. She’s young and she’s tough. And she’s not in anyone’s back pocket.
If the Ukrainians have already revealed how weak the Russian army is why do they need our help?
Are you going to put a Ukraine flag in your profile pic?
"Millions of people in Ukraine will suffer" oh gee we better send them billions of dollars - but willing to ignore all of the other suffering in the world.
If it's truly that big of a threat why don't all of the other former Soviet block states join together?
You're extremely wrong a lot. But this is the wrongest out of all your wrongs. Also you're going to get the mods panties in a bunch of talking politics.