OT: Demoncrats suck ARSE!

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,472
13,813
102
Relax. Clinton lied under oath during his Grand Jury testimony in the Paula Jones sexual predator lawsuit. He also witness tampered Monica Lewinski. He had 11 counts of Perjury, Suborning Perjury, Witness Tampering, etc in all. He settled with Paula Jones, paying her around 900K $. He was disbarred.
Trump has not been charged with anything; after 2+ years of SC investigating, and this Whistle Leaker bs is all contrived and will be proven so during the Senate Impeachment trial. Justice is coming. This whole thing is a smokescreen to hide the Obama admin. lawbreaking leading up to and during the last (2016) election. Be patient.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. A special prosecutor appointed by the republican congress investigated clinton for 4+ years, and just kept investigating until he found something. If you'll remember the congress would not accept the special prosecutor appointed by the AG because they feared Reno would do exactly what Barr has done for Trump.

Every person who has testified under oath has said Trump did something wrong. Every person who has refused to testify under oath has said trump did nothing wrong. hmmmm.

Every senate trial for impeachment in history has heard witness testimony, except this one. Hmmm.

Eventually, these court cases over trump's stonewalling and ignoring subpoenas will proceed and the truth will come out. And a lot of republicans will have a permanent stain on their records.

Oh and unrelated, you may have missed the story, but Trump's weaponized DOJ just completed their investigation into the Clinton Foundation. What did they find? Nothing. I guess the Clinton's wont be doing that perp walk after all. Yet another one of your predictions that was total BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: auctionhome

orangelvis

All-American
Nov 21, 2005
10,737
5,973
0
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. A special prosecutor appointed by the republican congress investigated clinton for 4+ years, and just kept investigating until he found something. If you'll remember the congress would not accept the special prosecutor appointed by the AG because they feared Reno would do exactly what Barr has done for Trump.

Every person who has testified under oath has said Trump did something wrong. Every person who has refused to testify under oath has said trump did nothing wrong. hmmmm.

Every senate trial for impeachment in history has heard witness testimony, except this one. Hmmm.

Eventually, these court cases over trump's stonewalling and ignoring subpoenas will proceed and the truth will come out. And a lot of republicans will have a permanent stain on their records.

Oh and unrelated, you may have missed the story, but Trump's weaponized DOJ just completed their investigation into the Clinton Foundation. What did they find? Nothing. I guess the Clinton's wont be doing that perp walk after all. Yet another one of your predictions that was total BS.

Are you laughing at yourself?
The IC in the Clinton impeachment had NOTHING to do with Paula Jones filing a LAWSUIT against the rapist, Bill Clinton, nor his subsequent crimes committed before and during his testimony.

Yes, every person who has testified OUTSIDE OF THE SCIFF, has had the OPINION that Trump did something wrong. None have had direct evidence of ANY lawbreaking. Vineman actually was a party to listening to the phone conversation and participated in writing the conversation memo! Trump and the Repubs, for the first time in HISTORY, were denied the opportunity to call witnesses during the Hearings, were denied legal council being present and were denied some PERTINENT cross examination questions!
The second article of impeachment, which you are parroting as stonewalling, is dead upon arrival, because you and the idiot dems don't understand seperation of powers and Executive Priviledge, which has always been decided at the SC in ALL of US history, but your girl, Nancy, said she couldn't wait for a decision, and now SHE is the one STONEWALLING. What a JOKE!

As for as your "unrelated" paragraph, let me remind you that YOU said the IG report a NOTHINGBURGER! How'd that work out for you? The WP is doing the same thing with this CF investigation.

We'll see who gets "stained", but keep it up. The MSM can tell you anything and you'll believe it!
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,158
17,806
113
Are you laughing at yourself?
The IC in the Clinton impeachment had NOTHING to do with Paula Jones filing a LAWSUIT against the rapist, Bill Clinton, nor his subsequent crimes committed before and during his testimony.

Yes, every person who has testified OUTSIDE OF THE SCIFF, has had the OPINION that Trump did something wrong. None have had direct evidence of ANY lawbreaking. Vineman actually was a party to listening to the phone conversation and participated in writing the conversation memo! Trump and the Repubs, for the first time in HISTORY, were denied the opportunity to call witnesses during the Hearings, were denied legal council being present and were denied some PERTINENT cross examination questions!
The second article of impeachment, which you are parroting as stonewalling, is dead upon arrival, because you and the idiot dems don't understand seperation of powers and Executive Priviledge, which has always been decided at the SC in ALL of US history, but your girl, Nancy, said she couldn't wait for a decision, and now SHE is the one STONEWALLING. What a JOKE!

As for as your "unrelated" paragraph, let me remind you that YOU said the IG report a NOTHINGBURGER! How'd that work out for you? The WP is doing the same thing with this CF investigation.

We'll see who gets "stained", but keep it up. The MSM can tell you anything and you'll believe it!

Remember this is a guy that can say with a straight face that 19 women that accused Trump of sexual assault/harassment are ALL LYING, but believes anything said about Clinton is god's own truth. Trump could rape a kid on TV and the Trumpians on here would just say "she was asking for it".

As I've said on here many times.. I think Clinton should have been removed from office for lying and probably locked up for the sexual assault charges. You'll never hear a Trumpian say anything like that... THEY ARE ALL LYING.
 

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,472
13,813
102
Are you laughing at yourself?
The IC in the Clinton impeachment had NOTHING to do with Paula Jones filing a LAWSUIT against the rapist, Bill Clinton, nor his subsequent crimes committed before and during his testimony.

Yes, every person who has testified OUTSIDE OF THE SCIFF, has had the OPINION that Trump did something wrong. None have had direct evidence of ANY lawbreaking. Vineman actually was a party to listening to the phone conversation and participated in writing the conversation memo! Trump and the Repubs, for the first time in HISTORY, were denied the opportunity to call witnesses during the Hearings, were denied legal council being present and were denied some PERTINENT cross examination questions!
The second article of impeachment, which you are parroting as stonewalling, is dead upon arrival, because you and the idiot dems don't understand seperation of powers and Executive Priviledge, which has always been decided at the SC in ALL of US history, but your girl, Nancy, said she couldn't wait for a decision, and now SHE is the one STONEWALLING. What a JOKE!

As for as your "unrelated" paragraph, let me remind you that YOU said the IG report a NOTHINGBURGER! How'd that work out for you? The WP is doing the same thing with this CF investigation.

We'll see who gets "stained", but keep it up. The MSM can tell you anything and you'll believe it!

yawn. Just keep throwing out your conspiracies. I will just keep laughing at you when none of it actually happens.
 

slycat

All-American
Oct 2, 2017
3,343
5,306
113
That's exactly what I'm saying. Any time Trump feels that he's taking heat at home, he "manufactures" a crisis to distract. It's the oldest trick in the book and it works. Don't get me wrong, I am well aware of what Iran is and have no problem with killing this guy. Interesting that Trump all of a sudden starts worrying about a random terrorist when he needs some positive press. Just like "justice warrior" Trump all of a sudden decided to clean up corruption abroad by investigating (Just by chance no doubt) his political rival. Remember the government shutdown and the sudden "border emergency" that allowed Trump to take money from hurricane recovery to fund the wall? Trump is helping out Trump. The same as he has his entire life. If America gets in a shooting war with Iran and a few thousand Americans have to die for Trump to get elected, I'm sure it's worth it to Trump (and his followers). This is aimed at boosting Trump and it's working. Trump is doing EXACTLY what he accused Obama of doing in 2011. Here you go... Even fox news sees it.

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/t...ma-would-start-war-with-iran-to-get-reelected

I'm not sure what you mean by "alernative view". Trump has spent his entire life self promoting and looking after number one. He is continuing that behavior

Sorry for the delay. But thx for the discussion.. even though we will probably never agree.

Soulamani was not a "random" terrorist (you can have your own opinon, but not your own facts) he was a top person in the Iranian power structure and the top person responsible for exporting terrorism. It was a BALLSY move to take him out... and one that is paying BIG dividends. It was a good kill and a good call in the big picture, IMO.

Before going point by point..,which we can, can we not agree that all politicians want to get re-elected? How about, that all people (maybe other than Jesus and Mother Theresa) are interested in themselves. Can one not be interested in oneself AND interested in doing greater good?

Look. If you hate Trump because he is immoral or a bad person, then you do. I cant change that. I don't think that he is perfect...neither was Clinton getting BJ's under the oval office desk or worse... or JFK womanizing etc. ..

It think by objective measures, Trump is a net gain for the Country... and I have not heard anything from any of the Dems that convinces me that they will have a greater net gain.

Immigration
Stock Market
Economy
Regulation Rollback
Appointment of Judges who are traditionalists (constitutionalists)
Employment/Unemployment
More advantageous trade deals
Energy Independence.

All positives for me...

Why elect Bernie, the millionaire "Socialist" LoL?