OT: Daily Covid thread 9/25

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jm0513

All-American
Aug 16, 2018
5,952
7,396
46
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,952
0
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...

Go outside and you usually do.
Enjoy the weekend!
 

MulletCork

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2012
2,682
3,224
113
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...
Oh, I'm sure it will!

Also, good luck with the procedure!
 
Jan 12, 2015
39,497
39,617
113
I think the blackface made him more susceptible to the disease.
Doesn't look like he socially distances either.
 

RU206

All-American
Jan 23, 2015
5,185
5,250
113
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...
It depends on why you went for the test. If you are feeling ill, and have symptoms, it's better to quarantine until the results come back so you don't infect others if you have it. If you went for the test for a basic medical procedure or as a requirement for your job you don't need to quarantine until the results come back unless the Dr. asks you to. It's all about context. A few examples: My sister was recently diagnosed with breast cancer and needed to go in for surgery. The oncologist asked her to quarantine after the test and for the week leading up to the surgery, so she did.

A friend of mine was required to take a test for him to go back into the office. He wasn't sick and had no symptoms, so he didn't quarantine.

A player on my daughters youth softball team was around a family member who was positive for Covid. That player can't rejoin the team until a negative test result, or a full 2 week quarantine (as long as she and anyone in the house doesn't show symptoms for 2 weeks).
 

UMRU

All-Conference
Sep 19, 2006
7,773
4,099
113
Back to back papers from the same lab at Rockefeller University report, what I believe, is a major breakthrough.

They report that 14% of people with serious COVID-19 have very limited type 1 interferon responses due to one of two mechanisms. First, some patients have inborn genetic mutations at one of 13 different genes necessary to make type 1 interferons. And second, even more interesting, some patients' own antibodies actually bind to and destroy their type 1 interferons.

The second mechanism has to be considered when giving convalescent plasma since these interferon neutralizing antibodies would be passed to the person receiving the plasma.

Here are the links from yahoo and from Science:

Overview from Yahoo news
more detail from Science
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
90,086
88,009
113
Back to back papers from the same lab at Rockefeller University report, what I believe, is a major breakthrough.

They report that 14% of people with serious COVID-19 have very limited type 1 interferon responses due to one of two mechanisms. First, some patients have inborn genetic mutations at one of 13 different genes necessary to make type 1 interferons. And second, even more interesting, some patients' own antibodies actually bind to and destroy their type 1 interferons.

The second mechanism has to be considered when giving convalescent plasma since these interferon neutralizing antibodies would be passed to the person receiving the plasma.

Here are the links from yahoo and from Science:

Overview from Yahoo news
more detail from Science
Thank you.
 

T2Kplus10

Heisman
Feb 24, 2010
28,180
17,566
0
It depends on why you went for the test. If you are feeling ill, and have symptoms, it's better to quarantine until the results come back so you don't infect others if you have it. If you went for the test for a basic medical procedure or as a requirement for your job you don't need to quarantine until the results come back unless the Dr. asks you to. It's all about context. A few examples: My sister was recently diagnosed with breast cancer and needed to go in for surgery. The oncologist asked her to quarantine after the test and for the week leading up to the surgery, so she did.

A friend of mine was required to take a test for him to go back into the office. He wasn't sick and had no symptoms, so he didn't quarantine.

A player on my daughters youth softball team was around a family member who was positive for Covid. That player can't rejoin the team until a negative test result, or a full 2 week quarantine (as long as she and anyone in the house doesn't show symptoms for 2 weeks).
Nice common sense post.
 

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
96,751
70,511
113
Masks do not keep you safe. It's a placebo for the dumb.

The Mayo Clinic disagrees......

"Can face masks help slow the spread of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19? Yes, face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as frequent hand-washing and social distancing, help slow the spread of the virus."

 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
197,363
149,410
113
The Mayo Clinic disagrees......

"Can face masks help slow the spread of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19? Yes, face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as frequent hand-washing and social distancing, help slow the spread of the virus."


So science doesn't agree.
 

Jm0513

All-American
Aug 16, 2018
5,952
7,396
46
It depends on why you went for the test. If you are feeling ill, and have symptoms, it's better to quarantine until the results come back so you don't infect others if you have it. If you went for the test for a basic medical procedure or as a requirement for your job you don't need to quarantine until the results come back unless the Dr. asks you to. It's all about context. A few examples: My sister was recently diagnosed with breast cancer and needed to go in for surgery. The oncologist asked her to quarantine after the test and for the week leading up to the surgery, so she did.

A friend of mine was required to take a test for him to go back into the office. He wasn't sick and had no symptoms, so he didn't quarantine.

A player on my daughters youth softball team was around a family member who was positive for Covid. That player can't rejoin the team until a negative test result, or a full 2 week quarantine (as long as she and anyone in the house doesn't show symptoms for 2 weeks).
I have no symptoms. Nurse implied I have to stay away from others so I dont risk being infected between today(test day) and Tuesday(procedure day)
I'm sorry to hear about your sister. Our friend was just diagnosed and starts treatment soon. She has a long road ahead but thankfully prognosis was good.
 

RU206

All-American
Jan 23, 2015
5,185
5,250
113
I have no symptoms. Nurse implied I have to stay away from others so I dont risk being infected between today(test day) and Tuesday(procedure day)
I'm sorry to hear about your sister. Our friend was just diagnosed and starts treatment soon. She has a long road ahead but thankfully prognosis was good.
Thank you. My sisters surgery was a success, and now she started radiation. So far so good.

I hope everything goes well on Tuesday. Positive thoughts.
 

Jm0513

All-American
Aug 16, 2018
5,952
7,396
46
Thank you. My sisters surgery was a success, and now she started radiation. So far so good.

I hope everything goes well on Tuesday. Positive thoughts.
Thank you... It's just a minor procedure.
Positive vibes sent your way for your sister as she starts her radiation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU205

Frida's Boss

All-American
Oct 10, 2005
10,952
7,738
0
The Mayo Clinic disagrees......

"Can face masks help slow the spread of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19? Yes, face masks combined with other preventive measures, such as frequent hand-washing and social distancing, help slow the spread of the virus."


As does the National Academy of Sciences

Our analysis reveals that the difference with and without mandated face covering represents the determinant in shaping the pandemic trends in the three epicenters. This protective measure alone significantly reduced the number of infections, that is, by over 78,000 in Italy from April 6 to May 9 and over 66,000 in New York City from April 17 to May 9. Other mitigation measures, such as social distancing implemented in the United States, are insufficient by themselves in protecting the public. We conclude that wearing of face masks in public corresponds to the most effective means to prevent interhuman transmission, and this inexpensive practice, in conjunction with simultaneous social distancing, quarantine, and contact tracing, represents the most likely fighting opportunity to stop the COVID-19 pandemic. Our work also highlights the fact that sound science is essential in decision-making for the current and future public health pandemics.

 

goru1869

All-Conference
Nov 16, 2005
7,239
3,630
113
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...
I had a biopsy done on bone in my right shoulder last month. I had to be at home for 7 straight days before the surgery except for when I had the covid test. I was bored sh$tless. I still let my wife and son live a life and go out. No problems came out of it .Good luck !
 

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
Just went for a mandatory Covid nasal test for a procedure I have on Tuesday. I asked if I was expected to stay inside for 4 days. Her reply was said with a smirk "That would be nice." I asked if my daughter was expected to remain in my home until Tuesday as well and all I got was a confused stare. 🤔
I hope this post doesn't start the usual preschool bickering between you boys. Uh..oops.. I mean men...
A family member was in a similar situation and advised to quarantine until procedure day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jm0513

Jm0513

All-American
Aug 16, 2018
5,952
7,396
46
A family member was in a similar situation and advised to quarantine until procedure day.
I do not mind. I just found it odd that when I asked if my daughter should as well the woman looked at me like I had 5 heads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUPete

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
65,427
44,445
113
Back to back papers from the same lab at Rockefeller University report, what I believe, is a major breakthrough.

They report that 14% of people with serious COVID-19 have very limited type 1 interferon responses due to one of two mechanisms. First, some patients have inborn genetic mutations at one of 13 different genes necessary to make type 1 interferons. And second, even more interesting, some patients' own antibodies actually bind to and destroy their type 1 interferons.

The second mechanism has to be considered when giving convalescent plasma since these interferon neutralizing antibodies would be passed to the person receiving the plasma.

Here are the links from yahoo and from Science:

Overview from Yahoo news
more detail from Science

Cool stuff, thanks. As you noted, this finding could explain a lot about why convalescent plasma has had such mixed success and why the very pure new antibody cocktails, which wouldn't contain all the other "stuff" from previously infected patients in their plasma, will hopefully be far more effective.

On a perhaps related note, a paper was just published by the Ridgeback/Merck folks on their oral antiviral EIDD-2801/MK-4482 (remdesivir is only IV), showing two key findings. First, they developed a mouse model with supposedly bona fide human lung tissue that duplicates what has been seen with infectivity and impacts of various human coronaviruses, including SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2, meaning it should be a good model to test treatments on. And second, they showed that this antiviral is very effective, in vivo, in preventing CV2 infections, used as a pre-exposure prophylactic (and it's worth noting that many of the antivirals were ineffective in vivo, such as HCQ, despite being active in vitro).

The antiviral is in a phase II human study now, which should be rolling into an expanded phase III study soon. Below is the abstract from the paper - where they also talk about inducing a robust type-1 interferon response. Would be curious of your opinion of the paper. This is the drug they brought me back for to help on with process development, as it's all hands on deck to make huge amounts, at risk, in case the clinical trials are positive.

https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-80404/v1_stamped.pdf

Abstract: All known recently emerged human coronaviruses likely originated in bats. Here, we used a single experimental platform based on human lung-only mice (LoM) to demonstrate efficient in vivo replication of all recently emerged human coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2) and two highly relevant endogenous pre-pandemic SARS-like bat coronaviruses. Virus replication in this model occurs in bona fide human lung tissue and does not require any type of adaptation of the virus or the host. Our results indicate that bats harbor endogenous coronaviruses capable of direct transmission into humans. Further detailed analysis of pandemic SARS-CoV-2 in vivo infection of LoM human lung tissue showed predominant infection of human lung epithelial cells, including type II pneumocytes present in alveoli and ciliated airway cells. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection was highly cytopathic and induced a robust and sustained Type I interferon and inflammatory cytokine/chemokine response. Finally, we evaluated a pre-exposure prophylaxis strategy for coronavirus infection. Our results show that prophylactic administration of EIDD-2801, an oral broad spectrum antiviral currently in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19, dramatically prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo and thus has significant potential for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football announces Dylan Lonergan as QB1 - TKR Pod
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
  3. 03 The Knight Report Statistical Profile Comparison: 2025 Dylan Lonergan versus 2025 Athan Kaliakmanis
  4. 04 Rivals 2029 ATH Darnell Engoto's stacking big offers as recruitment continues to build
  5. 05 The Knight Report Rutgers Football names Dylan Lonergan starting quarterback for 2026 season