Lately I've heard more marketing for cc processors and it's even getting pitched around here and there. It's early but it's coming. In a nutshell, venders get nailed on cc processing fees and the more fraud, the more those fees rise. Especially for manual entries for a card that doesn't read properly (vender gets hammered on those). What these processor companies are doing is adding the processing fee as a tax line item, passing the cost to the consumer. Its not consumer friendly but most consumers are clueless to the cost. What if I told you a small business doing 7 figure sales pays 5 figures yearly just to get paid? Also, gov't entities have already been passing this cost along if you pay with a card for a tax or car tag, whatever...
You can't be the first guys to do this in the private sector but as soon as a Walmart or another powerhouse like that does, it's over. Everyone will. The first correction will likely be consumers carrying cash to avoid the extra charge and that's a win-win for vendors.
To give an example a lot on this board will be familiar with is Lambert's in south Alabama. Not only do they not take cc , they have their own ATMs. Not only do they miss the cc processing fees that which is probably in the cpl hundred thousand range at their sales, they pocket a processing fee which adds to that profit stream. Your talking 6 figure profit swings at a place like that. Some might complain about the ATM fee but I don't care because my bank refunds them. Huge win-win for Lambert's.
Now the question is what the consumer prefers. You as a consumer, would you rather pay $35 for a shirt with an xtra "tax" that is a little loose change on your bill or would you rather that shirt cost $36 to cover the venders cc processing fees? The flip-side of that is you overpay if you pay cash. Is the "xtra" tax worth the convenience to pay with your watch like Samsung pay? So many angles...
Interesting capitalism driven convo I've been having with my business contemporaries lately. What say ye pack?
You can't be the first guys to do this in the private sector but as soon as a Walmart or another powerhouse like that does, it's over. Everyone will. The first correction will likely be consumers carrying cash to avoid the extra charge and that's a win-win for vendors.
To give an example a lot on this board will be familiar with is Lambert's in south Alabama. Not only do they not take cc , they have their own ATMs. Not only do they miss the cc processing fees that which is probably in the cpl hundred thousand range at their sales, they pocket a processing fee which adds to that profit stream. Your talking 6 figure profit swings at a place like that. Some might complain about the ATM fee but I don't care because my bank refunds them. Huge win-win for Lambert's.
Now the question is what the consumer prefers. You as a consumer, would you rather pay $35 for a shirt with an xtra "tax" that is a little loose change on your bill or would you rather that shirt cost $36 to cover the venders cc processing fees? The flip-side of that is you overpay if you pay cash. Is the "xtra" tax worth the convenience to pay with your watch like Samsung pay? So many angles...
Interesting capitalism driven convo I've been having with my business contemporaries lately. What say ye pack?