More important than Burt himself is the question:Will the world ever see the level of creativity as exhibited by those born in the era from 1920 to say 1970?Societal changes strongly suggest otherwise.
Wow, you'd have him in, but not Taylor Swift? I think he's brilliant and a legend and would have both in, but given your criticism of TS's music "not being rock," I can't imagine how you could defend most of Bacharach's work being rock and roll. The Billboard #1 songs he wrote or co-wrote were easy listening, at best: "This Guy's in Love with You" (1968), "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head" (1969), "(They Long to Be) Close to You" (1970), "Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)" (1981), and "That's What Friends Are For" (1986).Legend. I hope he is in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. RIP
Wow, you'd have him in, but not Taylor Swift? I think he's brilliant and a legend and would have both in, but given your criticism of TS's music "not being rock," I can't imagine how you could defend most of Bacharach's work being rock and roll. The Billboard #1 songs he wrote or co-wrote were easy listening, at best: "This Guy's in Love with You" (1968), "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head" (1969), "(They Long to Be) Close to You" (1970), "Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)" (1981), and "That's What Friends Are For" (1986).
I include that kind of music under the rock and roll umbrella, but you appear to only selectively. There's no doubt both BB and TS have been incredibly successful in popular music and there's no doubt that TS "rocks" more than BB, so I simply don't understand your logic here. He's on the short list of artists not in the RRHOF who should be, along with Dionne Warwick (his muse for many of his hits; see the link below - as an aside, you'll be happy to see Pat Benatar listed in that article as someone who should be in).
I "get" the criticism some have over the RRHOF being way too inclusive and that maybe it ought to be called the Popular Music HOF, but given we've already gone down the inclusive path, excluding BB and Dionne Warwick, for example, seems incongruous to me. And it would be beyond ludicrous to not have TS be a first ballot inductee in 2031.
https://jeremyhelligar.medium.com/the-rock-and-roll-hall-of-fames-unlucky-13-a35c876b4ea2
So, BB "rocks" more than TS? C'mon. If you think someone needs to "rock" to be in the RRHOF, you can't support BB being in.Absolutely in over Taylor Swift
Must've missed that last year, lol. Good to finally see.Pat Benetar is in already
So, BB "rocks" more than TS? C'mon. If you think someone needs to "rock" to be in the RRHOF, you can't support BB being in.
When you can't defend the indefensible, resort to lame attacks...take your Swiftie worship to Tiktok
More important than Burt himself is the question:Will the world ever see the level of creativity as exhibited by those born in the era from 1920 to say 1970?Societal changes strongly suggest otherwise.
a debt? I think not. They were/are well paid in the USA.We owe a huge debt to the creators and performers of the world.How plain and boring LIFE would be without them.
Pretty sure he's talking about a debt of gratitude for making life much more interesting and entertaining and I agree. And while the top tier performers are generally well paid, most struggle to make a good living in the music industry, as they often have crappy managers, who have bands sign ****** contracts and many bands only have 1 or 2 albums that sell well and don't make that much on them - and some blow that money. It's kind of like athletes, although the shelf life for artists can be longer (but often isn't).a debt? I think not. They were/are well paid in the USA.
++++++++++and +Pretty sure he's talking about a debt of gratitude for making life much more interesting and entertaining and I agree. And while the top tier performers are generally well paid, most struggle to make a good living in the music industry, as they often have crappy managers, who have bands sign ****** contracts and many bands only have 1 or 2 albums that sell well and don't make that much on them - and some blow that money. It's kind of like athletes, although the shelf life for artists can be longer (but often isn't).
Coarse Crap was actually the name of my first band.The Renaissance is often taught as "the rediscovery" of classical art.
But the art was never hidden - people just lost the ability/desire to appreciate it.
Fair to say there is currently a tremendous appetite for coarse crap - which is indeed ascendant.
well they get gratitude as well. no debt. they owe the debt to a society that is free (as do we all) and mostly functions where they can focus on art and not feeding themselves.Pretty sure he's talking about a debt of gratitude for making life much more interesting and entertaining and I agree. And while the top tier performers are generally well paid, most struggle to make a good living in the music industry, as they often have crappy managers, who have bands sign ****** contracts and many bands only have 1 or 2 albums that sell well and don't make that much on them - and some blow that money. It's kind of like athletes, although the shelf life for artists can be longer (but often isn't).
Coarse Crap was actually the name of my first band.
Unfortunately not so ascendant.
His TS fetish is very strange for such an old guy.Absolutely in over Taylor Swift
Fetish, lol. She's not even in my top 25 favorite artists, but arguing with people who don't think she's a talented singer-songwriter-producer in many genres (including rock and roll) and don't think she's R&RHOF worthy is kind of like shooting fish in a barrel.His TS fetish is very strange for such an old guy.
That's ridiculous. You know that's not rock and roll.Wow, you'd have him in, but not Taylor Swift? I think he's brilliant and a legend and would have both in, but given your criticism of TS's music "not being rock," I can't imagine how you could defend most of Bacharach's work being rock and roll. The Billboard #1 songs he wrote or co-wrote were easy listening, at best: "This Guy's in Love with You" (1968), "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head" (1969), "(They Long to Be) Close to You" (1970), "Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)" (1981), and "That's What Friends Are For" (1986).
I include that kind of music under the rock and roll umbrella,
Don't forget Tony Bennett.BB, Taylor Swift and The Carpenters can all go into the R&R HOF together
If Nat "King "Cole is in, why not TonyDon't forget Tony Bennett.
well they get gratitude as well. no debt. they owe the debt to a society that is free (as do we all) and mostly functions where they can focus on art and not feeding themselves.
I suppose we do owe a debt to the people that help unknown artists become known... like Van Gogh's brother and John Kennedy Toole's mother (who got his novel published after he killed himself).
if you say so. I said they already get proper gratitude as per their talents.. there is no debt there. sometimes they get too much "gratitude" leading to a cult of personalityYou don’t seem to be a very grateful person
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: Dantae Chin
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
The Knight Report
2027 Rutgers Football Recruits Season Stat Tracker: Week 0 Edition
The Knight Report
Rutgers QB Dylan Lonergan's HS Coach Breaks Down His Game, Journey and Tape - TKR Pod
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: J'Dan Burnett