You lost me with that last paragraph. Keeping taxes down? Overprotective suburban town? Large lot size requirements?Best of luck to the owners and the people trying to save the farm. Dehousing someone should not be the answer to affordable housing, nor should taking a farm someone still wants to farm. There is merit to the idea of planning for housing near jobs, but an isolated development with no access to the other community things - stores, parks, schools, churches, etc makes no sense at all. Also sticking large numbers of people next to a noisy and unhealthy 12 lane turnpike is an ******* move. It would have made more sense to take the land to build a warehouse there, not that I support that either.
Easy to blame the courts, but overprotective suburban towns created this mess. There are property sellers, willing builders and interested buyers for modest housing. Towns screwed all 3 groups to keep taxes down with large lot size requirements, but in doing so also screwed their own kids and seniors.
The reason that part of the county is having the issues is because it was overdeveloped with none of the the things you mentioned. If they had those things there wouldn’t be an issue.