This feels like the easiest, most palatable solution.
What? Did something happen to Illinois? We have a game scheduled with them this weekend. Unless somebody has to cancel, why on Earth would you change that?
This feels like the easiest, most palatable solution.
We have to play for the HAT trophy.What? Did something happen to Illinois? We have a game scheduled with them this weekend. Unless somebody has to cancel, why on Earth would you change that?
Are you betting on that?I think people are advocating hurting them by making them play NU in the championship game, thus handing OSU a loss.
Where's the inconvenience to just changing the number of required games to 5? All changing the rule does is make the East champion, as determined on the football field, play against the West champion, as determined on the football field. It's more about catering to us by giving us the game we deserve, in my mind, but I guess people have differences of opinion on our preferred matchup. I could not care less about OSU's playoff appearance, personally.
It's not complicated for the Big Ten to fix the problem it created, either. And it's also more competitive, and more fair to everyone involved. This is a situation where strict formalism with respect to a one-off rule is ridiculous. Our players have made a lot of sacrifices this year, and they've beaten every team in the West. They deserve to play in the Big Ten Championship, not the "Big Ten Championship" with the undercard drawing double the ratings.
Where's the inconvenience to just changing the number of required games to 5? All changing the rule does is make the East champion, as determined on the football field, play against the West champion, as determined on the football field. It's more about catering to us by giving us the game we deserve, in my mind, but I guess people have differences of opinion on our preferred matchup. I could not care less about OSU's playoff appearance, personally.
Yes, it is more complicated for the Big Ten to "fix" the problem, because by definition, doing ~anything~ differently will be seen as some form of favoritism and open the league up to scrutiny. And it would force teams to play against an opponent with less preparation. Makes no sense -- and is certainly not "more fair" as you say.
As for your Big Ten Championship vs. "Big Ten Championship" ...
Look, I get why we all say WE WANT OHIO STATE. If Ohio State didn't have a Covid outbreak and made it to six games, by all means. I was there for that third quarter in 2018. But they didn't make it to six.
Now, NU has put itself in a situation where a win against Indiana (which, by the way, would be a nice way to avenge last year's terrible blowout loss) means it wins a Big Ten Championship! I don't care who we beat to make it happen.
OSU getting into the CFP is not a sure thing. They need a couple of more games and besides, how legit would it be to claim a B1G championship without the conference's only undefeated and highest ranked team in it.This definitely gives the Big Ten enough time to do something (i.e. schedule Maryland) if they want OSU in the Championship Game without looking awful and scrapping the previous six-game rule.
Or they might just get the message from OSU that they'd rather have a bye week and play for the CFP in a couple of weeks against Iowa/Wisconsin.
I don’t know where the Ohio State playing the winner of Wisc/Iowa comes from either. If OS doesn’t have enough games to get into the B1G championship game what possible motivation would there be for them to play a “winner of” game if it’s too late for the B1G championship game?What is this about playing the winner of Iowa vs. Wisconsin? Did I miss something. The Big Ten Championship game is Dec 19. Someone will be playing NU in that game. The Big Ten season is over after that as far as I know.
Barring COVID, every B1G team will play on 12/19. The B1G championship game is intended to be one of 7 conference games that day.I don’t know where the Ohio State playing the winner of Wisc/Iowa comes from either. If OS doesn’t have enough games to get into the B1G championship game what possible motivation would there be for them to play a “winner of” game if it’s too late for the B1G championship game?
I don’t think the BCS has stated teams need a minimum number of games to get in so why would OS play a meaningless game they might somehow lose or get someone hurt by playing.
Ok, didn’t realize they were doing that this year.Barring COVID, every B1G team will play on 12/19. The B1G championship game is intended to be one of 7 conference games that day.
It's East 1 vs West 1 (Champ game)
East 2 vs West 2
East 3 vs West 3
and so on....
The 6 game threshold only applies to East 1 vs West 1 (the championship game).
So, as of now, Ohio State will play a ranked Wisconsin or Iowa team in the East 2 vs West 2 game.
The conference already moved the title game to noon eastern to as a contingency and to boost ratings without a "marquee" program being involved.
No such place. I think you mean the University of Tennessee / Chattanooga, home of team formerly known as the Fighting Moccasins.Chattanooga State, your table is ready....
I think the reason they moved the game is simpler - the Colts are playing the following day at 1 PM ET.
There is no longer a BCS, but the playoff committee would look at overall scope of work and beating a team like Wisc or Iowa would give them another quality win that they could use to assess. If the committee were on the fence between a 9 win team in Florida vs. a 5 win team like OSU that extra win could be the difference.I don’t know where the Ohio State playing the winner of Wisc/Iowa comes from either. If OS doesn’t have enough games to get into the B1G championship game what possible motivation would there be for them to play a “winner of” game if it’s too late for the B1G championship game?
I don’t think the BCS has stated teams need a minimum number of games to get in so why would OS play a meaningless game they might somehow lose or get someone hurt by playing.
What? Did something happen to Illinois? We have a game scheduled with them this weekend. Unless somebody has to cancel, why on Earth would you change that?
Barring COVID, every B1G team will play on 12/19. The B1G championship game is intended to be one of 7 conference games that day.
It's East 1 vs West 1 (Champ game)
East 2 vs West 2
East 3 vs West 3
and so on....
The 6 game threshold only applies to East 1 vs West 1 (the championship game).
So, as of now, Ohio State will play a ranked Wisconsin or Iowa team in the East 2 vs West 2 game.
look no further than BYUs decision to wanna swing from the ChanticleersThe games NU deserves are U of I plus IU in the BIG championship.
Game planning is serious businesses. Teams spend off-seasons scouting and preparing for each opponent, while watching tape and adjusting those plans the week of. Forcing teams to adjust on the fly is a nightmare. This was unavoidable for everyone in August/September and will happen again for the championship “+1” Saturday. Why do it again less with less than 5 days notice? The change only helps Ohio State and their playoff odds.
If your program and your opponent are healthy, just play the games on the schedule.
No, it isn't. The league is already under a ton of scrutiny from all angles for the late start and the lack of flexibility in the scheduling. I'm not sure Indiana has much of a leg to stand on here. They lost to Ohio State. If Michigan or Maryland doesn't have an outbreak, they have no shot. If the Big Ten weren't so concerned with the playoff, they could have built in a week for flexibility. But they thought they could move the national needle, and when they couldn't, they caved. And they're about to sacrifice any semblance of legitimacy for their championship game because of that unwillingness to stand up to the CFP.
Look. Northwestern in the B1G championship is LEGIT. You earned it. Indiana ? C'mon man. And the problem I have is that 2 out of the 3 games OSU had cancelled were by their opponents which OSU had no control over. Now they pay the price ? If it's a NU-OSU game I'll watch - it's legit. And again, congrats, you have a great coach. NU-Indiana ? Sorry, no interest just like I'm seeing on the other sites.
I feel like you're conveniently leaving out that the "rules" for this season have already been changed multiple times over. If it was Indiana 6-0 and OSU 5-0, and the Indiana - OSU game was cancelled because of OSU Covid positive tests then I would 100% agree with you. But OSU and Indiana played it out on the field, and OSU won.Because the rules going into the season required a team to play at least six games to qualify for the Championship game. If OSU does not play a game this weekend, they do not meet the conference’s pre determined requirements to qualify for the Championship game. The rules are established before a competition starts, not after it starts. You can’t change the rules after the fact because you don’t like the outcome. I know that is all the rage in this country right now but that’s not how it works.
There's Covid outbreaks everywhere. My point: don't penalize a team for some matters that are out of their control. If all 3 games were cancelled by OSU, well, maybe that's a different story. Plain and simple: you will not be playing the best the East.Hmmm... let's see... if 2 of the 3 games were canceled by opponents, and Ohio State didn't have a Covid outbreak itself, then would we be having this conversation?
It was a pokeNo such place. I think you mean the University of Tennessee / Chattanooga, home of team formerly known as the Fighting Moccasins.
Look. Northwestern in the B1G championship is LEGIT. You earned it. Indiana ? C'mon man. And the problem I have is that 2 out of the 3 games OSU had cancelled were by their opponents which OSU had no control over. Now they pay the price ? If it's a NU-OSU game I'll watch - it's legit. And again, congrats, you have a great coach. NU-Indiana ? Sorry, no interest just like I'm seeing on the other sites. I just read where the Michigan AD said OSU should be in the championship game. C'mon B1G, get it right.
I feel like you're conveniently leaving out that the "rules" for this season have already been changed multiple times over. If it was Indiana 6-0 and OSU 5-0, and the Indiana - OSU game was cancelled because of OSU Covid positive tests then I would 100% agree with you. But OSU and Indiana played it out on the field, and OSU won.
There's Covid outbreaks everywhere. My point: don't penalize a team for some matters that are out of their control. If all 3 games were cancelled by OSU, well, maybe that's a different story. Plain and simple: you will not be playing the best the East.
Originally we had a 12 game season with 9 conference games. Then we had a 10 game season with all conference games. Then we had no season at all. Then we had a 8 game regular season with only conference games and no byes plus the last week's matchups TBD. Since then, a number of games have been cancelled, team schedules changing.What rules have been changed? I am not aware of any. The rules for this unusual season were agreed to by every school in the conference before the season started. You can’t change the ground rules after the competition starts.
Originally we had a 12 game season with 9 conference games. Then we had a 10 game season with all conference games. Then we had no season at all. Then we had a 8 game regular season with only conference games and no byes plus the last week's matchups TBD. Since then, a number of games have been cancelled, team schedules changing.
When you are comparing a 5-0 team with a 6-1 team, and the 5-0 team beat the 6-1 in a head to head matchup, notwithstanding what the rules were at one point in an ever-evolving plan for how this season will play out, my vote would be that the most fair outcome is to have OSU play in the B1G CCG.
I would respect Indiana for voting for themselves though - and I suppose it would be fair enough to put it to a conference vote (though most likely one behind the scenes rather than a public vote).
PS Let's beat Illinois first and foremost, but if we do you know that's going to be the first question they ask Fitz in postgame. Would be interesting to see what his view is. Though most likely he would dodge the question (which is probably the sensible thing to do, frankly).
And you won't be playing at all!!!There's Covid outbreaks everywhere. My point: don't penalize a team for some matters that are out of their control. If all 3 games were cancelled by OSU, well, maybe that's a different story. Plain and simple: you will not be playing the best the East.
Who cares. That's Indiana's problem. We deserve to be there regardless of OSU's situation. It's Indiana that is benefiting from this weird scenario.And if that happens, get ready for all the people saying, “The 2nd place game is better than the 1st place game”, which will be fun.
look no further than BYUs decision to wanna swing from the Chanticleers
Easy solution! And likely scenarioEasy solution if they want to do it: move Rutgers vs Maryland to "champions week", play Minnesota vs Wisconsin that same weekend (so everyone else can play West vs East) and schedule Maryland vs OSU for this weekend.
The sanctimoniousness is strong here.That’s ********. Those “rules” were changed to allow for the season to be played despite COVID. Maybe it’s lost on you but EVERY SCHOOL, INCLUDING OSU, agreed to play under the 2020 rules BEFORE THE SEASON STARTED. One of those rules stipulated that teams had to play at least SIX games in order to qualify for the Big Ten championship game. Unles OSU plays this weekend, OSU will not meet the requirements to play NU in the Big Ten championship game. That PRIVILEGE would go to Indiana.
The sanctimoniousness is strong here.
Wildcat Report
Recruit Roundup: Buirley and Norman each score five TDs
On3 Football
2026 Midseason All-America football team and honors
Wildcat Report
Notebook: Braun believes he has 'a special football team'
Wildcat Report
The 3-2-1 after Northwestern's improbable 24-21 win over Michigan State
College Football Playoff
College Football Bowl Projections Week 8: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions