One thing I can't figure out

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
Did Trump obstruct Mueller before or after he concluded "no collusion"? If it was before, how did Mueller conclude "no collusion"? If it was after, what was "obstructed"? Can one of you scholars on the Left help me figure out the exact chronology since I'm getting it from both ends?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Did Trump obstruct Mueller before or after he concluded "no collusion"? If it was before, how did Mueller conclude "no collusion"? If it was after, what was "obstructed"? Can one of you scholars on the Left help me figure out the exact chronology since I'm getting it from both ends?
I think the bigger question is why was Mueller looking for obstruction after he knew there was no collusion. It seems to me that documenting an attempt to end the investigation that you also agree is unnecessary is ethically challenged.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
I think the bigger question is why was Mueller looking for obstruction after he knew there was no collusion. It seems to me that documenting an attempt to end the investigation that you also agree is unnecessary is ethically challenged.

Another excellent observation I'm 100% certain you will receive no explanation for from the Left.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Another excellent observation I'm 100% certain you will receive no explanation for from the Left.
I can tell you the answer.

The SC was created to find a crime, not investigate anything.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
I can tell you the answer.

The SC was created to find a crime, not investigate anything.

You and I are both aware of that, however our friends on the Left remain convinced he (Mueller) was "obstructed" from finding "collusion" that Barr is now hiding and Trump doesn't want anyone to testify to! [eyeroll]

I just want to know if the "obstruction" Mueller faced happened before the collusion wasn't found or after? I'm thoroughly confused. :confused:
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
You and I are both aware of that, however our friends on the Left remain convinced he (Mueller) was "obstructed" from finding "collusion" that Barr is now hiding and Trump doesn't want anyone to testify to! [eyeroll]

I just want to know if the "obstruction" Mueller faced happened before the collusion wasn't found or after? I'm thoroughly confused. :confused:
They dont care. At this point they must keep the illusion of investigations into trump alive because the investigations into their actions are not fake and they need to make them look like retaliation.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
They dont care. At this point they must keep the illusion of investigations into trump alive because the investigations into their actions are not fake and they need to make them look like retaliation.

So when the real "collusion" on their side is discovered, they will continue their denials of "obstruction" by refusing to accept either actually happened.

Only Trump and Republicans "collude" or "obstruct". Leftists just obey the Law and try to help the hungry, the thirsty, the lame, and illegals. [eyeroll]
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,123
4,053
113
I can tell you the answer.

The SC was created to find a crime, not investigate anything.
Also to cover up illegal spying/surveillance by Intelligence agencies and FBI going back to when Mueller was FBI Director. Time to dig up Nixon an issue a formal apology for what now equals the equivalency of a parking ticket compared to the new standard.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
Also to cover up illegal spying/surveillance by Intelligence agencies and FBI going back to when Mueller was FBI Director. Time to dig up Nixon an issue a formal apology for what now equals the equivalency of a parking ticket compared to the new standard.

None of them can even explain who was behind that FISA warrant with the fake, phony dossier? Do you really think they're going to come clean on Mueller's shenanigans back when he was FBI Director?

Puhleeese!!!!! [eyeroll]
 
Last edited:

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Also to cover up illegal spying/surveillance by Intelligence agencies and FBI going back to when Mueller was FBI Director. Time to dig up Nixon an issue a formal apology for what now equals the equivalency of a parking ticket compared to the new standard.
Definitely this too.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,123
4,053
113
None of them can even explain who was behind that FISA warrant with the fake, phony dossier? Do you really think they're going to come clean on Mueller's shenanigans back when he was FBI Director?

Puhleeese!!!!! [eyeroll]
I posted enough ACLU and DOJ I.G info yesterday the only way they can deny it is to say the ACLU is not trust worthy.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,617
6,222
113
I posted enough ACLU and DOJ I.G info yesterday the only way they can deny it is to say the ACLU is not trust worthy.

They're saying that about Mueller and Barr right now! You seriously underestimate the Left. They eat their own! Look what they did to Bernie!