Wow. You suck at making points then. Your point was that Mullen has developed QBs before at State? Here's your quote:
"Do you understand that Dan WON 9 games in 2010, beat Michigan, lost a 3 point game to eventual NC Auburn .. with Chris Relf at QB?"
How could that POSSIBLY be "I pointed out that Mullen developed QB before." Your implication is that we won DESPITE a ****** QB. Make no mistake. Relf is/was a ****** QB. He was a slow lumbering giant with an inaccurate rocket launcher for an arm. He left as a ****** QB too. The difference is we weren't asking him to make seven step drops in a pro style offense like Croom was. Mullen maximized his strengths and didn't ask him to make any semi-difficult reads or throws. That team was built on strong defensive and offensive line play (Thanks Croom, seriously), a stud RB, and a strong LB core. All Relf had to do was throw the occasional slant, deep ball, and screen pass.
Dan was able to mask ****** QB play because we were strong on the Oline and at running back. Guess what? Dan was able to mask horrendous OL and RB play this past year because of an elite QB. We don't have a strong offensive line and our defensive line does not have enough depth to replicate 2010. We can't get into 10-7 slugfests against the better teams we play. It's going to be a long year.