OFFICIAL NCAA TOURNEY DISCUSSION THREAD
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
This committee as well as past committees have no clue. The mis seeding of the teams is the only thing worse than the committee changing its criteria every year. Wichita State on their league easily and lost a war in the semifinals to Northern Iowa and go from a realistic 7 or 8 seed to a 11 seed. Van fleet was injure for some of their early losses and this is not your typical teams withou great shooters especially from 3, but there is not another team in the country that plays as hard as Coach Marshall gets them to play. The first 10 minutes of the Arizona game , the Wichita State players dove on the floor for loose balls 10 times. It was obvious they would win that game easily.
Another mis seeding nightmare, Indiana and Kentucky, who played like where they should have been seeded as 2 or 3's, not as 5 and 4's , play tomorrow. Both teams could have made the Final Four in any other region. To make matters worse the winner likely gets UNC , a favorite along with Kansas and Michigan State, but in a Sweet Sixteen game not a regional final. The committee has to consist of former coaches not a bunch of Ads who actually know the small details of teams . When the Vegas point spreads have your 11 seeds favored over your lower seeds, 6 or 7 seeds, you know the Committee as usual has it all wrong.
This committee as well as past committees have no clue. The mis seeding of the teams is the only thing worse than the committee changing its criteria every year. Wichita State won their league easily and lost a war in the semifinals to Northern Iowa and go from a realistic 7 or 8 seed to a 11 seed. Van fleet was injured for some of their early losses and this is not your typical Wichita team with great shooters especially from 3, but there is not another team in the country that plays as hard as Coach Marshall gets them to play. The first 10 minutes of the Arizona game , the Wichita State players dove on the floor for loose balls 10 times. It was obvious they would win that game easily.
Another mis seeding nightmare, Indiana and Kentucky, who played like where they should have been seeded as 2 or 3's, not as 5 and 4's , play tomorrow. Both teams could have made the Final Four in any other region. To make matters worse the winner likely gets UNC , a favorite along with Kansas and Michigan State, but in a Sweet Sixteen game not a regional final. The committee has to consist of former coaches not a bunch of Ads who actually know the small details of teams . When the Vegas point spreads have your 11 seeds favored over your lower seeds, 6 or 7 seeds, you know the Committee as usual has it all wrong.
Last edited:
the Pac 12 seeds were all overseeded. Its a mediocre conference
Oregon should be a 2 not 1
Utah are a 3 and ok with that but could be a 4 too
Im okay with Cal being a 4 but could also be a 5.
Arizona is more like a 7 than 6
Oregon State should be a 9 even 10...obviously they went strictly by rpi making them a 7
USC/Colorado were in 8-9 games okay with that but both probably closer to 9s
1-3 not a good start
Oregon should be a 2 not 1
Utah are a 3 and ok with that but could be a 4 too
Im okay with Cal being a 4 but could also be a 5.
Arizona is more like a 7 than 6
Oregon State should be a 9 even 10...obviously they went strictly by rpi making them a 7
USC/Colorado were in 8-9 games okay with that but both probably closer to 9s
1-3 not a good start
Its not about "overrated" - The Pac12 performed well out of conference this year. Far, far better than Big 10 or SEC and if you are evaluating conferences, that is what has to be considered. Remember none of the Pac12 teams were favored in Vegas yesterday. Even Arizona and Colorado as higher seeds were underdogs. People know the Pac12 teams arent as good as their seed but they had to get respect because the conference did very well in November, December.
The link between seeding and Vegas point spreads is foolish. Two totally different things. This happens every single year. The selection committee is there to assess team resumes. Vegas is projecting who will win. Obviously there is a correlation between the two but they are never going to be exact. Wichita State had no business being better than an 11 seed. WIth their regular season performance, they are lucky to get in the tournament They had only one win against an at-large quality NCAA team. Wichita was never a 7 seed. The wins were not there.
I agree there was some mis-seeding (mainly Kentucky, Syracuse), but to say that 11 seeds can't be favored over 6 seeds is just totally not understanding what the committee is there to do and what Vegas does. Is the committee supposed to look at talented teams without great resumes, and say "well, we know you are good, we we are putting you at a 2 seed despite your 10 losses". Two years ago Tennessee as an 11 seed was a big favorite (like 5 or 6 points) over a 6 seeded Iowa. Tennessee was extremely talented but had simply did not have the resume.
the committee bought lock stock and barrell into the rpi...most of the wins of the Pac 12 schools are against each other. When ASU and UCLA who are bad teams are hovering near 100 you know the rpi numbers are inflated. Oregon State is your perfect example. The Pac 12 did deserve 7 bids, I wouldnt question but making Oregon a one is laughable and that region there is pretty weak..how could Michigan State not be put in that region not to mention how is MSU a 2 at the expense of Oregon.
Well, every conference will have most of its wins against each other, but the out of conference performance is what will determine how those wins are valued. And yes, it does have a domino effect. Once the Pac-12 did well out of conference, then play each other for 18 games, each team's SOS is going to be raised. As a comparison, several Big 10 teams had poor OOC performances including teams that would have success in the conference to varying degrees (Indiana, Wisconsin, Ohio State). Those poor OOC performances cannot be reversed once conference play starts. Looking at the teams, I doubt many people would pick the Pac12 over Big 10 if you had 1 vs 1, 2 vs 2, 3 vs 3, etc....but the results are the results from November and December.
who did Cal beat OOC? St Marys
who did Oregon State beat? I see Tulsa...
USC beat Wichita State and Yale
Arizona beat Gonzaga and thats it
Colorado best was just BYU
Oregons wins were Baylor and Valp
Utah beat Temple, Duke, San Diego State and Texas Tech so this is the only one loaded up on the quality wins
note these schools were also losing in OOC games too, this list isnt all that impressive.. most but not all were bubble schools. What pushed their rpi up was strong schedule strength but the truth is that they lost most of these games.
so a closer look shows the non conference wins are not really all that impressive...some nice wins moreso from Oregon and Utah but nothing to write home about from the rest
who did Oregon State beat? I see Tulsa...
USC beat Wichita State and Yale
Arizona beat Gonzaga and thats it
Colorado best was just BYU
Oregons wins were Baylor and Valp
Utah beat Temple, Duke, San Diego State and Texas Tech so this is the only one loaded up on the quality wins
note these schools were also losing in OOC games too, this list isnt all that impressive.. most but not all were bubble schools. What pushed their rpi up was strong schedule strength but the truth is that they lost most of these games.
so a closer look shows the non conference wins are not really all that impressive...some nice wins moreso from Oregon and Utah but nothing to write home about from the rest
If we are assessing overall conference strength you also have to consider league wins vs Texas, Gonzaga, Kentucky, and Texas A&M from the 5 teams that did not make the NCAA tourney (UCLA, Stanford, Wash, ASU, WSU). Those wins bump up the resumes of the lesser teams which will end up helping both the NCAA qualifying and non NCAA qualifying teams in computer rankings.
So in total a OOC win resume for conference of Tulsa, Wichita, Yale, Monmouth, Gonzaga, BYU, Baylor, Valpo, Temple, Duke, SDSU, Texas Tech, Texas, Gonzaga again, Kentucky, Texas A&M and then a ton of other OK wins vs teams like Boise, Creighton, Fresno, etc..... For a 12-team league, I think that is pretty good although I haven't compiled this type of list for other conferences. Would other leagues have better? I don't know. Also didn't have too many bad losses for the most part that jump out at me.
With all of this said, the Pac12 failures could be the story of the tournament in 1.5 hours if this keeps up...and that would be fair.
Oregon State going down as ridiculous mistake as a 7 seed
and Cal in major trouble as a 4 seed
if these results hold, I think its probably the worst showing by a major conference in a first round ever...5 of 7 falling assuming Oregon wins
and Cal in major trouble as a 4 seed
if these results hold, I think its probably the worst showing by a major conference in a first round ever...5 of 7 falling assuming Oregon wins
Michigan State was down 15-2 early on Middle Tennessee State and has been trying to claw their way back in ever since. Not too concerned quite yet, remember we saw an abysmal RU go toe to toe with the Spartans at the RAC for a half. Obviously MTSU is better and the longer they stay in , the longer the chance for an upset. You know MSU will be loaded for bear in the 2nd half.
Iowa looked pretty good up 10 over Temple
the Cal and Hawaii game is a good one and smells like upset
Iowa looked pretty good up 10 over Temple
the Cal and Hawaii game is a good one and smells like upset
Missed the early games but this MTSU MSU game looks like it's gonna come down to the wire. I'd lose a final 4 team but like I said who cares I love upsets!
Down 7 and 1 with 40 secs left. I think that's all she wrote for MSU. It's going to take some really bad FT shooting by MTSU for MSU to have a chance to come back.
Well the are one of the worst FT shooting teams in the country. Around 61% I think they just showed.
Are they really, I didn't see that but just made a couple and got block and possession now so surely now up 9 with 18 secs.
Well unlike USC last night against Providence, looks like MTSU came through when they needed with regards to FTs late.
What a horrific job by Izzo today...Michigan St may be the biggest ddisappointment in tourney history
I was the only one in the whole scarlet nation group to pick MTSU!! TIME TO MAKE A COMBACK !! 
.. The only reasons I picked them: (1) MTSU has the best 3-point shooter in the nation, at 50% from 3, and the 3-pointer is the way the game is going these days
(2) MSU was only beating RU by 2 at halftime, so how good could they really be?
.. The only reasons I picked them: (1) MTSU has the best 3-point shooter in the nation, at 50% from 3, and the 3-pointer is the way the game is going these days
(2) MSU was only beating RU by 2 at halftime, so how good could they really be?
Was just gonna say, maybe biggest upset in tourney history. Duke and Georgetown have had a few clunkers in the past too.
I think Middle Tennessee State got snubbed for at large bid last year so credit to them for using that as motivation
Oh man Iowa fouled a 3 pt shooter up 3 with 2 secs left. He's made 2 and now the icing TO before the 3rd FT.
Tie game. .8 secs left.
Tie game. .8 secs left.
What is your point? Neither team should have been in based on their season performance. How they perform in the NCAA tournament is irrelevant to whether they should have been in. They can both go to the final four and it won't change whether or not they should have been in the tournament.
Every time Lundquist says "Utah" 2 things keep running through my mind:
1) why is he calling Iowa "Utah" and
2) Johnny
1) why is he calling Iowa "Utah" and
2) Johnny
Wisconsin and Pitt are in the middle of an awful game. Setting records for futility (Wiscy lowest point total in the 1st half of an NCAA game...ever, if I heard correctly).
Last edited:
I think that's just for this years tournament .
I remember a final four clunker between Wisconsin and Michigan state in 2000 that had less first half points .
I thought they said it was 19, previously, but again I could have misheard I'm still exhausted from going out yesterday afternoon, then to MSG for wrestling last night, then back out in Hoboken until closing time. Ugh.
Maybe I misheard too . But it's certainly an ugly game , but an NCAA tournament game nonetheless.
Oh sure, Northern Iowa/Texas and Cincy/St. Joe's were interesting and all, but they can't compare to the nail-biting thrills of a nil/nil La Liga game.
Latest
-
01
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football names Dane Pizzaro starting kicker for 2026 season
-
02
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: Antwan Raymond
-
03
The Knight Report
Recruit Visitor list for Rutgers season opener against UMass
-
04
The Knight Report
The Knight Report Live Ask The Experts Chat: September 2nd Edition
-
05
The Knight Report
Staff Predictions for Rutgers Football versus UMass