Obama The Hypocrite

EdgarAllenPodolak

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2023
1,327
3,143
112
Imagine being such a rube as to post Roger Stone as the bastion of truth. Yeah, OP’s orange cult leader idiot has turned the entire Executive Branch into an incompetent mess of retribution and corruption, like a true narcissist, and people like OP are obsessed with getting back at the Black president for openly mocking the birther cretin. Shocker.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,647
23,315
113
Imagine being such a rube as to post Roger Stone as the bastion of truth. Yeah, OP’s orange cult leader idiot has turned the entire Executive Branch into an incompetent mess of retribution and corruption, like a true narcissist, and people like OP are obsessed with getting back at the Black president for openly mocking the birther cretin. Shocker.
Oh you are one of those race hustlers. The Black President.

Your Black President happened to commit treason.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
12,934
22,057
113
Lol…already hedging your bets, I see. Yeah, all that leverage they have on Comey over a pic of seashells will get him to “roll”.

Just out of curiosity, do you engage in any serious discussion or do I just ignore you now?

He will act as if he's interested in serious debate, then you will dunk all over him and point out his idiotic racism and ignorance, then he will put you on ignore and claim victory.

For history, he also lost a ban bet and instead of leaving,changed his handle and kept posting.

So in short, he's a *****.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
244,927
10,769
103
Tulsi from the top rope


You realize Tulsi is arguably the most unqualified and lying DNI this country has ever had, right? During the SignalGate hearings, she insisted "there was no classified material" in the Signal chat (ROTFL) even after details about military strike timing and operations became public. She also claimed "It is not the IC's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat" which is fracking absurd...assessing threats and informing policymakers is literally a core function of the IC.

Parks And Recreation GIF
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,647
23,315
113
You realize Tulsi is arguably the most unqualified and lying DNI this country has ever had, right? During the SignalGate hearings, she insisted "there was no classified material" in the Signal chat (ROTFL) even after details about military strike timing and operations became public. She also claimed "It is not the IC's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat" which is fracking absurd...assessing threats and informing policymakers is literally a core function of the IC.

Parks And Recreation GIF
You realize I don’t care what you think about Tulsi?
 

fsu1jreed

Heisman
Apr 1, 2002
8,819
16,514
113
The FBI investigating Russia's proven interference in the 2016 election means Obama is guilty of treason?
That is the spin? haha good luck.

The Republican Senate report found Trump's campaign met with Russian officials over 100 times..........that's multiple times a week

So yea, there was Russian collusion
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
24,647
23,315
113
The Republican Senate report found Trump's campaign met with Russian officials over 100 times..........that's multiple times a week

So yea, there was Russian collusion
We now have AI to refute your silly claims. And they are silly. Didnt come from the Senate report. You pulled that out of your ***. The way you stated it is FAKE NEWS. They did not "meet with Russian officials over 100 times" much less 5 or 10 times. You have fallen for the MSNOW Rachel Maddow hook.

No, the claim is misleading and not fully accurate.

nytimes.com
The "over 100 times" part
  • The figure of over 100 contacts (often cited as ~140) between Trump associates/campaign figures and Russian nationals, WikiLeaks, or intermediaries comes from a 2019 New York Times analysis, not a Senate report.

    nytimes.com
  • This tally includes emails, calls, texts, meetings, and social media messages compiled from public reporting, court records, and the Mueller report. It spans the campaign and transition period (roughly mid-2015 to early 2017). Some were innocuous (e.g., diplomatic outreach), while others raised concerns (e.g., Paul Manafort sharing polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, who had Russian intelligence ties).

    thehill.com
The Senate Intelligence Committee's bipartisan (Republican-led) Volume 5 report (2020) detailed extensive contacts and counterintelligence risks—especially around figures like Manafort, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, and others—but it did not state or emphasize a specific "over 100 meetings" figure. It focused on how Russia exploited vulnerabilities in the campaign.

intelligence.senate.gov
"Republican Senate report found... Russian collusion"
  • The Senate Intelligence Committee investigation was bipartisan (chaired by Republican Richard Burr, with Democrat Mark Warner as vice chair). It affirmed Russian interference aimed at helping Trump but found no evidence of conspiracy or collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

    intelligence.senate.gov
  • Key points from the report and related probes:
    • Russia conducted an extensive influence campaign (hacking, disinformation, social media).
    • There were problematic contacts and poor judgment by some Trump associates (e.g., eagerness for dirt on Clinton, failure to report some outreach).
    • No coordination or collusion: The committee, Mueller investigation, and others explicitly did not establish a criminal conspiracy. Mueller stated the evidence "did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government."

      npr.org
  • The report highlighted "grave" counterintelligence concerns (e.g., Manafort's ties) but stopped short of collusion claims.

    npr.org
Bottom line: There were many contacts (some suspicious), which is what you'd expect in a high-profile campaign with foreign interest. The Senate report documented them thoroughly but rejected the "collusion" narrative as a coordinated conspiracy. The meme-style claim mixes a real NYT tally with a partisan spin that the actual Senate findings do not support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner