NYT, CNN, and WaPo

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Now have less integrity than InfoWars. Don't even use them as sources libs.

Don't even.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
 

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
Also ABC, NBC, USA Today
Wish Wall Street would have realized that back when political hack reporter from ABC Brian Ross falsely reported news on Trump and cost 100’s of millions of dollars. The fake news reporting eventually got him reassigned / fired, but the damage was done.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,165
113
I honestly hope Americans completely and 100% reject every story these folks report from now on. Every poll, every "un-named source" every exclusive, every allegation, every suggestion, every scenario these people in the main news media blare incessantly at us, I hope all of it is summarily rejected as "fake news" from here on out.

They are untrustworthy, they are liars, they are incompetent, they are indeed the "enemy of the people" as Trump referred to them

Media=Lazy, stupid, biased, and WRONG...always wrong!
 

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-report-shows-collusion-disgraceful-hoax.html

Piers Morgan: "Once revered newspapers like The New York Times and Washington Post are effectively finished as credible purveyors of fair and balanced news."
As if Piers Morgan knows his *** from a hole in the ground. Plenty of outlets have some bias, but you are harming yourself if you don't read/watch multiple sources for a balanced view. If you only pay attention to the sources that agree with your own point of view, you are putting yourself in a bubble.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,165
113
As if Piers Morgan knows his *** from a hole in the ground. Plenty of outlets have some bias, but you are harming yourself if you don't read/watch multiple sources for a balanced view. If you only pay attention to the sources that agree with your own point of view, you are putting yourself in a bubble.

I'm not so sure you need multiple points of view as long as the views you are getting are truthful. But I agree it's good to consult a variety of different sources as long as the material that is being sourced can be factually or reliably confirmed.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
LOL!

"Fake News!" "Crooked Media!"

Yet you guys believe the habitual liar. Priceless. You guys are so self unaware.
Speaking of self aware. You fell for the big lie. You can go sit in the corner with your dunce hat in hand
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
LOL!

"Fake News!" "Crooked Media!"

Yet you guys believe the habitual liar. Priceless. You guys are so self unaware.
Faced with all facts calling him wrong, the poor ignorant creature pushes forward like nothing happened.

Its mental illness. Someone should report it.
 

lenny4wvu

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
5,310
40
35
As if Piers Morgan knows his *** from a hole in the ground. Plenty of outlets have some bias, but you are harming yourself if you don't read/watch multiple sources for a balanced view. If you only pay attention to the sources that agree with your own point of view, you are putting yourself in a bubble.
Dims CREATED the bubble and OWN the bubble,now and FOREVER..PERIOD!
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
Except that was still massive collusion. Just because Meuller couldnt prove criminality in regard to conspiracy with the hack, that doesnt mean Russia and the Trump campaign weren't working together.

All those things still happened. The Trump Tower meeting, Roger Stone, Manafort sending internal campaign information to the Russians, etc.

Show me something some any of the three organizations, from an actual reporter and not a pundit, opinion piece, comedian, etc. That is false that wasn't retracted.

I bet you are still going to post every update from a guy who even the people that work with him say he makes up stories though, right?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
Except that was still massive collusion. Just because Meuller couldnt prove criminality in regard to conspiracy with the hack, that doesnt mean Russia and the Trump campaign weren't working together.

All those things still happened. The Trump Tower meeting, Roger Stone, Manafort sending internal campaign information to the Russians, etc.

Show me something some any of the three organizations, from an actual reporter and not a pundit, opinion piece, comedian, etc. That is false that wasn't retracted.

I bet you are still going to post every update from a guy who even the people that work with him say he makes up stories though, right?
Mueller warned you kid. You are making this way harder for yourself.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Except that was still massive collusion. Just because Meuller couldnt prove criminality in regard to conspiracy with the hack, that doesnt mean Russia and the Trump campaign weren't working together.

All those things still happened. The Trump Tower meeting, Roger Stone, Manafort sending internal campaign information to the Russians, etc.

Show me something some any of the three organizations, from an actual reporter and not a pundit, opinion piece, comedian, etc. That is false that wasn't retracted.

I bet you are still going to post every update from a guy who even the people that work with him say he makes up stories though, right?
Congressman Swalwell, glad to have you posting the board. You’re batshit crazy, but glad to have you here.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Except that was still massive collusion. Just because Meuller couldnt prove criminality in regard to conspiracy with the hack, that doesnt mean Russia and the Trump campaign weren't working together.

All those things still happened. The Trump Tower meeting, Roger Stone, Manafort sending internal campaign information to the Russians, etc.

Show me something some any of the three organizations, from an actual reporter and not a pundit, opinion piece, comedian, etc. That is false that wasn't retracted.

I bet you are still going to post every update from a guy who even the people that work with him say he makes up stories though, right?

LOL, you're as deranged as KKKwrong.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
Good grief this one is a dim bulb.

No prosecution = exoneration.

Me having to explain this to you multiple times = embarrassing to your parents.
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
Exonerated <> couldn't prove.

I'm asking for any example of the three organizations you named having falsely reported (not an op-ed, statement by a pundit or a guest, etc) something that wasn't retracted. If they have no integrity, as you said, this should be easy.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
I'm asking for any example of the three organizations you named having falsely reported (not an op-ed, statement by a pundit or a guest, etc) something that wasn't retracted. If they have no integrity, as you said, this should be easy.

Deleted <> retraction

NYT - Comey himself debunked this - https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/us/politics/russia-intelligence-communications-trump.html?_r=0
WaPo - LOLz - http://web.archive.org/web/20161231...c90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html
CNN - https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-cnn-resignation-20170626-story.html
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
lol, as if trumps dumb rubes ever read any of them, can I quote the WSJ when it echoes the news in these?
 

boomerwv

Freshman
Jan 16, 2008
9,988
79
48
Deleted <> retraction

NYT - Comey himself debunked this - https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/us/politics/russia-intelligence-communications-trump.html?_r=0

This story is true, and proven. Manafort was in contact with Russian Intel, even passing along campaign information to them. The Times even points out that the officials said they hadnt seen evidence that the campaign as a whole was colluding with Russians.

WaPo - LOLz - http://web.archive.org/web/20161231...c90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html

This story messed up how far into the system they were able to get. It should have been fully retracted instead of edited. It also has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation.

CNN - https://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-cnn-resignation-20170626-story.html

This is literally an article about CNN retracting a story and firing the reporters involved. Such low integrity....