Not So Supreme, Mr. Roberts

cigaretteman

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
4,102
4,631
113
By Maureen Dowd
Opinion Columnist, reporting from Washington

It’s crazy to think about Donald Trump outrunning anything.
But in legal terms, the president is an Olympic-class sprinter. He breaks the law so fast that the law is left in his orange dust.
Trump is an outlaw. And our system was not built for an outlaw in the Oval.
He zeros in on loopholes in the law and the system that are based on trust and the assumption that our leaders — and their families — will be not be voracious scam artists.
“The Constitution was built on this idea that the president would have enough decency and morality that they just wouldn’t run around exploiting the gaps,” said the Trump biographer Tim O’Brien. “And for Trump, it’s like red meat. This idea that Trump’s mentor was Roy Cohn was profoundly wrong. Donald Trump’s mentor was Fred from day one. His father showed him how to exploit the government system, the legal system and business. His whole worldview is built around the idea that you exploit systems for personal gain, and there’s nothing wrong with doing that because the world’s populated by sharks and you just have to be the biggest shark.”
After running a court that has been complicit in Trump’s defiling our institutions and razing our hallowed spaces, Chief Justice John Roberts seems belatedly alarmed.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT


“That construction is likely unlawful,” Roberts wrote in his dissent on Monday from his fellow Republican justices’ ruling that the president’s ballroom behemoth — with taxpayers on the hook for over $300 million — can slouch toward completion. Noting that the president was “likely” infringing on Congress, Roberts added, “Today’s decision is no victory for the separation of powers.”
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
The White House is the People’s House. Chief executives are transient tenants. Its “stately simplicity,” President Teddy Roosevelt once said, “is an expression of the character of the period in which it was built, and is in accord with the purposes it was designed to serve.” Safeguarding it, he said, gave us continuity with our past.
Roberts used that quote in his dissent, as well as a line from Winston Churchill: “We shape our buildings, and afterwards our buildings shape us.”
Trump was a builder, but he is such an egotist he can only view buildings — and reflecting pools — as reflections of himself. When he built Trump Tower, he tore down the Art Deco friezes on Bonwit Teller despite promising them to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Just so, he bulldozed the East Wing and tore up both of Jackie Kennedy’s gardens before Congress or historic preservationists had a chance to weigh in.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson calls this a “catch me if you can” approach.
The Supreme Court protects the outlandish outlaw by palavering about whether the architectural historian who brought the case has “standing” to do so. Yet shouldn’t any American have standing to challenge Trump’s desecrations? Trump ludicrously blasted the preservationists fighting to stop the ballroom as “TREASONISTS.”

​



As he casually divides and undermines America, he obsesses on using Krazy Glue to affix gold crap to the walls of the Oval Office or plotting to plant 47 maple trees in Lafayette Park to honor himself. He got us into a war he has no clue how to get out of, yet spends his time mulling redecorating projects, gold gewgaws, his new helipad and his replacement of the asphalt driveway at the White House with granite.
There are so many pathetic scenes of the Supreme Court and Republicans in Congress caving in to Trump — on his war in Iran that he calls “small potatoes” and that JD Vance risibly claims is not a war; on his attempts to disenfranchise voters; on trying to hijack the Postal Service to obstruct those voting by mail; on plotting to sell of a chunk of Yosemite to a private developer; on allowing the killing of endangered wolves and the secret slaughter of wild horses; on trying to slap his name back on the Kennedy Center; on his petty, vindictive renaming of Lake Ontario as “Lake America,” in the midst of the U.S.-Canadian trade war, even though it’s not even named for the Canadian province.
Now Trump is breaking ground for his solipsistic, Napoleonic Triumphal Arch — never mind that it lacks federal approval and that the gold angel on top might endanger planes flying in and out of Reagan National Airport.
O’Brien thinks the most tragic thing is that the Supreme Court now has a conservative majority that believes in the unitary executive and is getting roadblocks out of the way to give the president more latitude, at the very moment we get a Caligula who desperately needs roadblocks. Roberts issued the ruling in 2024 giving Trump near-total criminal immunity, and that makes him complicit in Trump’s egregious behavior.
Roberts gave Trump the runway, and now he’s objecting. But it’s too late.
“And that’s the lesson of everybody who doesn’t understand who Donald Trump is,” O’Brien said. “He’s simply there to pick your pocket.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyMtNole

Finance85

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2022
1,557
2,642
113
There is a lot right, and also a lot wrong, with this opinion piece. It's patently unfair and disingenuous to blame Roberts for the federal rules on standing. Current rules are really tough because they pretty much demand plaintiffs show personal harm to bring suit. It's fairly rare that any suits survive the current rules on standing based on a purely Constitutional basis.

Right now we have an issue with Congress. Republicans in Congress are afraid if Trump and refuse to challenge Trump in any way. That's how this is supposed to work. It's pretty simple - don't fund anything. Contractors want to be paid. When funding the government, stop creating pools of money that give the POTUS broad discretion.

As far as the article goes, there's plenty to call Trump out on. The problem is the author has to pile on by mentioning things Trump is unlikely to be personally involved in. Doing that serves no good purpose. Focus the outrage where it belongs - the actual significant violations of the public trust, and how the GOP led Congress lets Trump have his way. Congress also needs to revise the rules on standing to allow purely Constitutional issues be addressed. They don't want to do this because of fear if the federal courts becoming overwhelmed. That's a legitimate concern, but there has to be a solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aardvark86
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Wide Receiver
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Basketball Wednesday Update: What we are hearing inside Clemson Basketball - injuries & Hunter's eligibility
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Clemson legacy O-line offer planning return trip after impressive recent visit
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated Football WEDNESDAY CLEMSON FOOTBALL INTERVIEWS: Chris Johnson, Jeremiah Alexander & Champ Thompson
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Defensive End