No Kings 10/18

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
Trump just ensured this protest will be lit! haha



 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,158
17,805
113
I actually went to the No Kings protest in Pocatello. I was surprised by how many folks were there. It was totally peaceful and there were a couple of folks hanging out in Truck with MAGA flags nearby. No problems... The MAGA folks were nice enough and so were the protesters. There was a very small police presence and no violence at all. That's the way it should be.

IMHO, when protestors start setting stuff on fire and looting/rioting, they aren't protesters any longer, but criminals and should be tossed in jail. So my opinion here is that Trump has no business shutting down any protest, but he does absolutely have the right to have the cops and (if necessary) the National Guard to land on these folks like a ton of bricks if they start rioting.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
I actually went to the No Kings protest in Pocatello. I was surprised by how many folks were there. It was totally peaceful and there were a couple of folks hanging out in Truck with MAGA flags nearby. No problems... The MAGA folks were nice enough and so were the protesters. There was a very small police presence and no violence at all. That's the way it should be.

IMHO, when protestors start setting stuff on fire and looting/rioting, they aren't protesters any longer, but criminals and should be tossed in jail. So my opinion here is that Trump has no business shutting down any protest, but he does absolutely have the right to have the cops and (if necessary) the National Guard to land on these folks like a ton of bricks if they start rioting.
These protests are completely non-violent and there is no reason for a police crackdown unless they're protecting the protestors from counter-protestors. The last one has been called the largest anti-government protest in history and there wasn't a single violent incident of any kind that I'm aware of so no reason to play the "if setting stuff on fire and looting/rioting" game when that hasn't been an issue at all.
 

chscoggins

Junior
Jan 6, 2011
195
295
63
These protests are completely non-violent and there is no reason for a police crackdown unless they're protecting the protestors from counter-protestors. The last one has been called the largest anti-government protest in history and there wasn't a single violent incident of any kind that I'm aware of so no reason to play the "if setting stuff on fire and looting/rioting" game when that hasn't been an issue at all.
the assertion that there was "not a single violent incident of any kind" is inaccurate, as isolated but serious incidents of violence, including shootings and clashes with police and counter-protesters, were reported.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
the assertion that there was "not a single violent incident of any kind" is inaccurate, as isolated but serious incidents of violence, including shootings and clashes with police and counter-protesters, were reported.
Wow, you do speak in complete sentences. The shooting incident wasn't caused by the protestors nor were any of the other incidents, but sure, you can expect a few skirmishes here and there when you have six million people in the streets. Do you feel like your comment means you win?
 

chscoggins

Junior
Jan 6, 2011
195
295
63
Wow, you do speak in complete sentences. The shooting incident wasn't caused by the protestors nor were any of the other incidents, but sure, you can expect a few skirmishes here and there when you have six million people in the streets. Do you feel like your comment means you win?
It just proved you are incorrect.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,647
3,899
93
Eyeroll. Why would prosecuting the J6 criminals make one criminal? And why would just being married to that prosecutor make you evil?
This is kind of where I am too. Why does prosecuting a case make you a criminal? And why does organizing peaceful protests make one a criminal? I mean, if it did, then wouldn't that make all the individuals who planned and attended Jan6 "protests", criminals? And if there were all criminals by virtue of planning and attending "protests", then wasn't it Matt Graves' job as a prosecutor to prosecute them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
This is kind of where I am too. Why does prosecuting a case make you a criminal? And why does organizing peaceful protests make one a criminal? I mean, if it did, then wouldn't that make all the individuals who planned and attended Jan6 "protests", criminals? And if there were all criminals by virtue of planning and attending "protests", then wasn't it Matt Graves' job as a prosecutor to prosecute them?
They think it should be illegal to prosecute those who commit crimes for Trump, which not only makes you evil, it means your spouse is too. Make sense of that.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,873
35,902
113
Communist affiliation.



The Communist Party is among the many socialist and Democrat Party-allied groups involved in sponsoring the “No Kings” protest.

Earlier this year, one of the march’s armed volunteer “peacekeepers” fired into the crowd in Salt Lake City, believing there was a MAGA threat. He killed a bystander and injured a far-left militant. The media completely brushed over the group’s association with deadly violence.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
Retards. Groomers. Useful idiots. Gullible, naive, easily brainwashed muppets. Antifa. Paid protesters. They'll all be there.
Nobody has to be paid to be there dumbass, we're more than happy to do it for free. And I can assure you the opposite of maga isn't what you describe. GFY for your complicit support of a mad king's take over.
 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93



The folks screaming “No Kings Day” claim to hate tyranny... but their entire platform is built on control. They want open borders, lawlessness in the streets, men in women’s sports, abortion on demand, and government spending like there’s no tomorrow... and they dare to call that “patriotism.”

They lecture America about freedom while silencing dissent. They preach tolerance while canceling anyone who disagrees. They cry about kings, but the only throne they serve is ideology... where emotion rules over reason and victimhood crowns itself as virtue.

The reality is that you can’t say you love America while trying to dismantle everything that makes it great... faith, family, freedom, and the rule of law.

No kings? I agree. But that includes the self-appointed moral monarchs who think their feelings outrank the Constitution.
 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
Nobody has to be paid to be there dumbass, we're more than happy to do it for free. And I can assure you the opposite of maga isn't what you describe. GFY for your complicit support of a mad king's take over.
Every single protest is filled with paid protesters. They organize and bring them in on busses. It's not speculation... it's a fact that has consistently gotten proven over and over again.

And I'm not sure how much of an absolutely brain washed retard you have to be in order to actually believe Trump is a 'mad King' or trying any 'take over'... but you're making a strong case.

But have fun supporting your platform:
  • Mass migration
  • Dirty cities
  • Men in women’s sports
  • Baby killing
  • High taxes
  • Inflationary spending
  • Anti-police
  • Anti-male
  • Anti-woman
  • Anti-children
  • Anti-whites
  • Anti-American
  • Pro-foreigner
  • Pro-gangbanger
  • Pro-Hamas
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,890
7,602
113
The folks screaming “No Kings Day” claim to hate tyranny... but their entire platform is built on control. They want open borders, lawlessness in the streets, men in women’s sports, abortion on demand, and government spending like there’s no tomorrow... and they dare to call that “patriotism.”

They lecture America about freedom while silencing dissent. They preach tolerance while canceling anyone who disagrees. They cry about kings, but the only throne they serve is ideology... where emotion rules over reason and victimhood crowns itself as virtue.

The reality is that you can’t say you love America while trying to dismantle everything that makes it great... faith, family, freedom, and the rule of law.

No kings? I agree. But that includes the self-appointed moral monarchs who think their feelings outrank the Constitution.
Oh look, the loser with awful theology who rehashes republican talking points from the moral majority days almost 40 years ago is back to make the board a worse place.

Ya hate to see trash get piled up again but 'weapon x' will sure bring as much as he can, always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
Every single protest is filled with paid protesters. They organize and bring them in on busses. It's not speculation... it's a fact that has consistently gotten proven over and over again.

And I'm not sure how much of an absolutely brain washed retard you have to be in order to actually believe Trump is a 'mad King' or trying any 'take over'... but you're making a strong case.
The copium you have to ingest to believe what you're saying is pathetic. You know damn well this demented socipath has stepped way over any red line that we would have ever allowed in the past but you don't give a **** because you're a POS that just wants to see your enemies destroyed, no matter how it's done.

You know that no matter what this won't end well don't you? And your venomous *** will be complicit.
 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
Oh look, the loser with awful theology who rehashes republican talking points from the moral majority days almost 40 years ago is back to make the board a worse place.

Ya hate to see trash get piled up again but 'weapon x' will sure bring as much as he can, always.

Cute insult. When people run out of arguments, they always reach for names.

You can call it “awful theology” or “old talking points,” but truth doesn’t expire just because it makes you uncomfortable. The moral foundation this country was built on isn’t outdated... it’s just inconvenient for people who don’t want accountability. And if defending faith, family, and freedom makes me “trash,” then grab a broom.
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,890
7,602
113
Cute insult. When people run out of arguments, they always reach for names.

You can call it “awful theology” or “old talking points,” but truth doesn’t expire just because it makes you uncomfortable. The moral foundation this country was built on isn’t outdated... it’s just inconvenient for people who don’t want accountability. And if defending faith, family, and freedom makes me “trash,” then grab a broom.
You're a sad, insecure, pathetic little man. If you're not an incel (likely) I'm sure your wife hates you so much lol

I'm happy to continue the insults if you'd like!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
The copium you have to ingest to believe what you're saying is pathetic. You know damn well this demented socipath has stepped way over any red line that we would have ever allowed in the past but you don't give a **** because you're a POS that just wants to see your enemies destroyed, no matter how it's done.

You know that no matter what this won't end well don't you? And your venomous *** will be complicit.

You sling insults and call me complicit, but your argument is a highlight reel of emotion with zero receipts. If you want to accuse someone of crossing red lines, show the line and show the crossing... don’t theatrically vomit labels and expect that to pass for evidence. I defend the rule of law and the Constitution, not personalities. Wanting accountability and due process isn’t “copium”... it’s competence.

And here’s the thing: shouting about doom doesn’t make your prediction true... it just makes you easier to ignore. Keep the venom; I’ll keep the facts, the logic, and the receipts. When the noise dies down, the truth always gets the last word.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
Cute insult. When people run out of arguments, they always reach for names.

You can call it “awful theology” or “old talking points,” but truth doesn’t expire just because it makes you uncomfortable. The moral foundation this country was built on isn’t outdated... it’s just inconvenient for people who don’t want accountability. And if defending faith, family, and freedom makes me “trash,” then grab a broom.
You defend trash, you are trash. Nobody, not a damn soul wants to assault your family except in your feeble insecure imagination. GFY
 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
You're a sad, insecure, pathetic little man. If you're not an incel (likely) I'm sure your wife hates you so much lol

I'm happy to continue the insults if you'd like!

You’ll have to do better than recycled playground insults from your parents’ basement. But keep swinging... every insult you throw says more about your insecurities than mine.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
You sling insults and call me complicit, but your argument is a highlight reel of emotion with zero receipts. If you want to accuse someone of crossing red lines, show the line and show the crossing... don’t theatrically vomit labels and expect that to pass for evidence. I defend the rule of law and the Constitution, not personalities. Wanting accountability and due process isn’t “copium”... it’s competence.

And here’s the thing: shouting about doom doesn’t make your prediction true... it just makes you easier to ignore. Keep the venom; I’ll keep the facts, the logic, and the receipts. When the noise dies down, the truth always gets the last word.
Oh shut it blowhard, there's a new example every day that you willfully ignore because you secretly love the pain it causes people you hate.

 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
You defend trash, you are trash. Nobody, not a damn soul wants to assault your family except in your feeble insecure imagination. GFY

You own Democrats want to assault our families. Your own Democrats want conservatives and their children murdered. They text it. They say it. They celebrate it when it actually happens. You side with the party of evil, moral-less cowards.
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,890
7,602
113
You own Democrats want to assault our families. Your own Democrats want conservatives and their children murdered. They text it. They say it. They celebrate it when it actually happens. You side with the party of evil, moral-less cowards.
LOL it came out YESTERDAY that leaders of your party are texting each other about throwing democrats in gas chambers.

Your inability for self reflection and critical thinking just highlights your lack of depth and intelligence. So once again, your aggression and smugness comes across to everyone as small and insecure.

Pathetic Lil incel
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
You own Democrats want to assault our families. Your own Democrats want conservatives and their children murdered. They text it. They say it. They celebrate it when it actually happens. You side with the party of evil, moral-less cowards.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

GO. F. YOURSELF

1760645429402.png
 

Weapon_X

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2018
580
1,484
93
Oh shut it blowhard, there's a new example every day that you willfully ignore because you secretly love the pain it causes people you hate.


The article’s entire premise collapses under basic scrutiny. It’s built on anonymous “sources familiar with the shift” and zero hard evidence. No signed orders, no public memos, no confirmed investigations... just speculation repackaged as journalism. The IRS has always had the authority to investigate any organization that violates tax law, regardless of political leaning. That’s not “weaponization,” that’s law enforcement. And if you’re suddenly terrified of the IRS having investigative power, you might want to revisit the Obama-era targeting of conservative nonprofits... that actually happened, with real names, real audits, and real apologies from the IRS itself. Funny how selective outrage only surfaces when it’s politically convenient.

This piece doesn’t read like reporting; it reads like preemptive victimhood. There’s no constitutional crisis here, no “dark road,” just emotional theater masquerading as fact. The First Amendment isn’t under attack because an administration enforces tax law... it’s only under attack when government applies laws unevenly. Until someone produces documentation showing Trump directed political persecution through the IRS, this story is nothing more than a headline for people allergic to evidence. If truth were a courtroom, this article wouldn’t make it past opening statements.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,298
27,082
113
The article’s entire premise collapses under basic scrutiny. It’s built on anonymous “sources familiar with the shift” and zero hard evidence. No signed orders, no public memos, no confirmed investigations... just speculation repackaged as journalism. The IRS has always had the authority to investigate any organization that violates tax law, regardless of political leaning. That’s not “weaponization,” that’s law enforcement. And if you’re suddenly terrified of the IRS having investigative power, you might want to revisit the Obama-era targeting of conservative nonprofits... that actually happened, with real names, real audits, and real apologies from the IRS itself. Funny how selective outrage only surfaces when it’s politically convenient.

This piece doesn’t read like reporting; it reads like preemptive victimhood. There’s no constitutional crisis here, no “dark road,” just emotional theater masquerading as fact. The First Amendment isn’t under attack because an administration enforces tax law... it’s only under attack when government applies laws unevenly. Until someone produces documentation showing Trump directed political persecution through the IRS, this story is nothing more than a headline for people allergic to evidence. If truth were a courtroom, this article wouldn’t make it past opening statements.
1760646912244.png