News today

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,269
7,715
113
Bad news for the corrupt RINOS, cheaters and those who steal elections.

THANK GOD I VOTED FOR “UNELECTABLE” JUSTIN HEAP OVER THAT TRAITOR STEPHEN RICHER.

By ignoring the tablets Moses brought down from the mountain, there is a chance of fair elections. Throw out 500,000 food stamp recipients and Arizona can still be saved

 

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,718
6,682
113
If Paxton loses to Talarico in Texas he will be the poster boy for bad candidate selection given how bad Talarico is.

My hope for 2028 is Vance, Rubio or DeSantis is the candidate. All 3 have great character and would be good presidents. My fear is the Dems get control again and not only turn back on the taxpayer spigots to their NGO's but learn from California how to rig elections at a national level. I never will understand why the SAVE act was controversial. With all the back and forth it seems like election integrity should be something everyone wants to ensure.
We have election integrity. There is no election fraud has shown by any source even the Heritage Foundation and by Trump I's commission headed by the fool from Kansas. The majority of states have voter ID. Save America Act is a voter suppression act. A married woman would need a Passport to be allowed to vote in example. The only basis for alleging election fraud is Trump's inability to accept his loss in 2020. I can't believe people are stupid and gullible to the extent that they believe him and this election fraud BS.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tjfleck6

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,665
27,608
113
If Paxton loses to Talarico in Texas he will be the poster boy for bad candidate selection given how bad Talarico is.

My hope for 2028 is Vance, Rubio or DeSantis is the candidate. All 3 have great character and would be good presidents. My fear is the Dems get control again and not only turn back on the taxpayer spigots to their NGO's but learn from California how to rig elections at a national level. I never will understand why the SAVE act was controversial. With all the back and forth it seems like election integrity should be something everyone wants to ensure.

The controversial provision in the SAVE act is "proof of citizenship." For many people, that would require something like ordering a birth certificate. Previously, a valid ID is sufficient to register to vote, which is especially notable because states can actually cross reference your ID and contact information with your citizenship status.

The rest of it is pretty standard fare. Dems might have opposed, but Rs would have had a PR advantage on the contents.

I don't see it with Vance. Which means the GOP will nominate him, and considering his ties to Trump/lack of a winning personality, good luck with that nominee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

AzIllini

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2003
2,444
1,001
78
I don't see why secure elections are an issue. States like California give drivers licenses to anything that breathes, including humans. Just check a box on your drivers license application and you are registered.

"no documentary proof of citizenship. Under California's Motor Voter system, a DMV customer must indicate that he or she is eligible to vote and attest to U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. California does not require the person to show a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers as proof of citizenship before being registered"

Seems like there should be a reasonable level of proof required.
 
Last edited:

stoneaxe27

All-American
Sep 22, 2006
5,718
6,682
113
I don't see why secure elections are an issue. States like California give drivers licenses to anything that breathes, including humans. Just check a box on your drivers license application and you are registered.

"no documentary proof of citizenship. Under California's Motor Voter system, a DMV customer must indicate that he or she is eligible to vote and attest to U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. California does not require the person to show a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers as proof of citizenship before being registered"

Seems like there should be a reasonable level of proof required.
You are seeking a cure for a problem that does not exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffT819

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,269
7,715
113
You are seeking a cure for a problem that does not exist.
Haha. Liked by the guy JeffT who says fraud does not exist, yet Arizona just dropped 500,000 people from the food stamp program! How much money is that? Tigjhtem the standards and make them prove their eligibility and 50 percent fall off the government tit!

Any real CFO or American would love this news
 

JeffT819

All-Conference
Dec 4, 2001
1,617
1,229
113
Haha. Liked by the guy JeffT who says fraud does not exist, yet Arizona just dropped 500,000 people from the food stamp program! How much money is that? Tigjhtem the standards and make them prove their eligibility and 50 percent fall off the government tit!

Any real CFO or American would love this news
The reason for the drop was the law changed and Arizona is very slow in processing SNAP applications. No evidence of massive fraud. Keep tilting at windmills.
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,553
5,596
113
I HAVE A WIFE AND DAUGHTERS! TALARICO CERTAINLY WANTS THEM RAPED AND MURDERED, MOST DEFINITELY. YOU GOT ME! I'M A TERRIBLE PERSON, SUPPORTING THESE RAPISTS AND MURDERERS.

You have no idea how crazed I think this logic is. It's the kind of argument one makes when he/she knows his position is BS, but feels compelled to say something.

Again, Republicans had every opportunity to reject Ken Paxton, for Cornyn or Hunt. They rejected that for the crook, probably in no small part because being a crook has become appealing to many of them ("he fights"). That was their choice, and now I'll make my choice.
It is not crazed logic to be concern about a candidates positions before sending them to congress.

DO I NEED TO TYPE IT IN ALL CAPS TO DRIVE THE POINT HOME?