Clemson's total domination of Alabama was mind blowing. Their QB looks like the next Heisman.
I actually turned the game off at the half with it being so one sided.
I actually turned the game off at the half with it being so one sided.
Funny how coaching and player development works.This is one of those games that if you looked at the statistics and not the score, you could conclude it was a close game:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401032087
First downs: Clemson 21, Bama 23
Total Yards Clemson 482, Bama 443
Time of possession: Clemson 28:23; Bama 31:37
Bama had two turnovers to zero for Clemson, but that does not account for the beat down of 44-16.
Clemson will be back in it next year. Their QB is a Freshman, and the two leading receivers from last night, Ross and Higgins, are a freshman and a sophomore. Their RB, Etienne, is a sophomore.
With such young talent at skill positions, it is amazing they could field a semblance of an offense.
Funny how a roster full of 4 and 5 stars works too. It's both, isn't it?Funny how coaching and player development works.
This is one of those games that if you looked at the statistics and not the score, you could conclude it was a close game:
http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401032087
First downs: Clemson 21, Bama 23
Total Yards Clemson 482, Bama 443
Time of possession: Clemson 28:23; Bama 31:37
Bama had two turnovers to zero for Clemson, but that does not account for the beat down of 44-16.
Clemson will be back in it next year. Their QB is a Freshman, and the two leading receivers from last night, Ross and Higgins, are a freshman and a sophomore. Their RB, Etienne, is a sophomore.
With such young talent at skill positions, it is amazing they could field a semblance of an offense.
Clemson didn't look like that all season. They barely won a few games against bad ACC teams. I wasn't sold on them having a chance but they showed up when it mattered the most and everything just clicked for them in the best possible time.
Clemson destroyed every ACC team except for 10-3 Syracuse. Please tell me the bad ACC teams Clemson barely beat.
He was probably referring to a seemingly close game with Boston college as well
Alabama may be better than Clemson on both sides of the ball -
But last night , ‘fast and loose’ won.
YEP !Funny how a roster full of 4 and 5 stars works too. It's both, isn't it?
The "LIKE" is for your last sentence.I am NOT a Bama fan
I only like Clemsen slightly more
I have my doubts about whether many are actual students
(sorry..ive been a college Prof for decades)
while I know some are !
I am a Florida fan( I live here and taught here)
I will be happy when RUTGERS becomes a factor in college football
We’re down right now but we had a nice run. We can come back. Cause finished 15 and were not very good a few years ago.I am NOT a Bama fan
I only like Clemsen slightly more
I have my doubts about whether many are actual students
(sorry..ive been a college Prof for decades)
while I know some are !
I am a Florida fan( I live here and taught here)
I will be happy when RUTGERS becomes a factor in college football
What? It could have been 3 chips in a row. If Bryant had a ounce of accuracy throwing the ball Clemson would have won last year too. Everything clicked for Bama last year.Clemson didn't look like that all season. They barely won a few games against bad ACC teams. I wasn't sold on them having a chance but they showed up when it mattered the most and everything just clicked for them in the best possible time.
Wow, do these guys troll every single forum to right every imagined wrong against their school?Clemson destroyed every ACC team except for 10-3 Syracuse. Please tell me the bad ACC teams Clemson barely beat.
Isn't this the same type of info that some claim is why we are so bad? Too many young players?Clemson will be back in it next year. Their QB is a Freshman, and the two leading receivers from last night, Ross and Higgins, are a freshman and a sophomore. Their RB, Etienne, is a sophomore.
With such young talent at skill positions, it is amazing they could field a semblance of an offense.
4 out of 15 games were won by 13 or lessClemson didn't look like that all season. They barely won a few games against bad ACC teams. I wasn't sold on them having a chance but they showed up when it mattered the most and everything just clicked for them in the best possible time.
It's the same narrative on the men's hoops board too, but we are not allowed to talk about that.Isn't this the same type of info that some claim is why we are so bad? Too many young players?
The Pack is not a good team.A 52-13 beating by A&M verified this.I follow them ,however, because my Grand Daughter is a student there and was on the dance team.They are better than RU but don't deserve to be ranked.4 out of 15 games were won by 13 or less
#15 Syracuse by 3
#16 Texas A&M by 2
Auburn by 8
NC State by 7
Which one of theses teams was a bad ACC team, 9 - 4 NC State?
A B1G Time change is needed.When or if that will ever happen is in other hands than ours.It's the same narrative on the men's hoops board too, but we are not allowed to talk about that.
It's Rutgers. We need to age young players for them to produce. But then we don't develop them when they have been aged. We are screwed.
I am NOT a Bama fan
I only like Clemsen slightly more
I have my doubts about whether many are actual students
(sorry..ive been a college Prof for decades)
while I know some are !
I am a Florida fan( I live here and taught here)
I will be happy when RUTGERS becomes a factor in college football
Don't worry, Ash is getting the 4 and 5 *** of Europe. were going to go head to head with Clemson next year.Funny how a roster full of 4 and 5 stars works too. It's both, isn't it?