I already told you what I think the admin is going to do with this manufactured crisis.How so? More like back to square 1. The admin said it won't sign that, so it sounds like they are the ones that "lose".
I already told you what I think the admin is going to do with this manufactured crisis.How so? More like back to square 1. The admin said it won't sign that, so it sounds like they are the ones that "lose".
You then said going back to square 1 was a loss for Dems. I still don't get that.I already told you what I think the admin is going to do with this manufactured crisis.
And your kids remained with family members, not in cages and not in a concentration camp.
Thanks for playing. Johnny has a parting gift for you.
You then said going back to square 1 was a loss for Dems. I still don't get that.
I already told you what I think the admin is going to do with this manufactured crisis.
Crazy, completely speculative, off-the-cuff prediction. If a generally acceptable solution is not found quickly to this crisis, the Dems will feel pressured to capitulate to the building of the wall to protect the kids so non-citizens won’t be able to commit the crime of illegal entry and be separated from their children. Dems “protect“ the kids, Trump gets his wall.
You mean like President Obama ordered done to these two female detainees sleeping in a holding cell as seen in this June 18, 2014 photo? And like all the other children he ordered separated by age group and gender, at a US Customs and Border Protection center in Nogales, Arizona?And your kids remained with family members, not in cages and not in a concentration camp.
Thanks for playing. Johnny has a parting gift for you.
Because their children are placed with relatives in a loving home with family members and are comforted. Unlike making a difficult and distant journey evading an inhumane situation, already potentially suffering from some form of mental trauma only to be denied any emotional comfort from other human beings.
Young boys sleep in a holding cell at the Nogales Placement Center on June 18, 2014.
![]()
Disgusting. Obama was evil.
You mean like President Obama ordered done to these two female detainees sleeping in a holding cell as seen in this June 18, 2014 photo? And like all the other children he ordered separated by age group and gender, at a US Customs and Border Protection center in Nogales, Arizona?
![]()
First of all, Obama never "ordered" detainees to be separated. In fact, he wanted families kept together but he was ruled against and ordered to stop.
Secondly, because another person did it makes it alright? Is that your defense? Seriously?
Thirdly, this is clearly a trump policy as stated repeatedly by Sessions.
Fourth, anyone doing this ******** is wrong.
Stupid post. Seeking asylum in the U.S. is not a crime.
And rallies planned nationwide on June 30 - Families Belong Together.
Not good for the "Orange One." He's going to take a beating on this.
“President Trump tries to make illegal children into baked potatoes to serve at school lunches”, CNN’s own, Jim Acosta, is on the scene to report on these grizzly findings.Detainees sleep and watch television in a holding cell where hundreds of mostly Central American immigrant children were being processed and held at the CBP Nogales Placement Center on June 18, 2014.
![]()
Annnnnnd this is where the liberals lose the narrative.And rallies planned nationwide on June 30 - Families Belong Together.
Not good for the "Orange One." He's going to take a beating on this.
WRONG....i don't believe you...and you are full of stupid **** every time you postNo he didn't. Stop watching faux news. You believe any stupid **** you see and hear which sounds like something you want to believe.
There is no federal law that stipulates that children and parents be separated at the border, no matter how families entered the United States. An increase in child detainees separated from parents stemmed directly from a change in enforcement policy repeatedly announced by Sessions in April and May 2018, under which adults (with or without children) are criminally prosecuted for attempting to enter the United States.
That’s my thought. I think I posted it in this thread already. They’re manufacturing a crisis they’re going to have to do something with. Since the GOP controls the legislation, whatever gets pushed forward will be whatever Trump wants. Dems think they’ll be able to survive politically if they don’t vote for this solution to this humanitarian crisis?Crazy, completely speculative, off-the-cuff prediction. If a generally acceptable solution is not found quickly to this crisis, the Dems will feel pressured to capitulate to the building of the wall to protect the kids so non-citizens won’t be able to commit the crime of illegal entry and be separated from their children. Dems “protect“ the kids, Trump gets his wall.
WRONG....i don't believe you...and you are full of stupid **** every time you post
That’s my thought. I think I posted it in this thread already. They’re manufacturing a crisis they’re going to have to do something with. Since the GOP controls the legislation, whatever gets pushed forward will be whatever Trump wants. Dems think they’ll be able to survive politically if they don’t vote for this solution to this humanitarian crisis?
I love a good bongo rally though.
“Since the GOP controls the legislation”
That is one thing that confuses me. That being the case (and, i agree with your statement), it’s frustrating to hear POTUS say it’s up to the Democrats to change things on this issue.
Is that what he said or does he say it’s up to the Dems to stop obstructing? It’s really the only card they have, but in this case, it can be used against them because of how dire they’re painting the situation. I think they’re overplaying their hand. They should want this discussion in Oct/Nov. as it stands, this can be solved before midterms and they’ll have to give in. They can’t not solve the problem the problem and if legislation is pushed, they’ll be in a tight box.“Since the GOP controls the legislation”
That is one thing that confuses me. That being the case (and, i agree with your statement), it’s frustrating to hear POTUS say it’s up to the Democrats to change things on this issue.
Is that what he said or does he say it’s up to the Dems to stop obstructing? It’s really the only card they have, but in this case, it can be used against them because of how dire they’re painting the situation. I think they’re overplaying their hand. They should want this discussion in Oct/Nov. as it stands, this can be solved before midterms and they’ll have to give in. They can’t not solve the problem the problem and if legislation is pushed, they’ll be in a tight box.
Asylum from what?And let me again remind everyone that it is not illegal to seek asylum.
Crossing the border illegally for the first time is a misdemeanor. OP, and many others in this thread, are just a bit off on the magnitude of the “crime” that has been committed. And let me again remind everyone that it is not illegal to seek asylum.
Not surprising that one group in particular continues to be misinformed about this issue. This administration is simultaneously arguing that this is the fault of the Democrats, that they hate it and want it changed, that they are enforcing the policy as a deterrent to immigration, and that the policy does not even exist.
I mean...good luck with all that.
Definitely legal to seek asylum. Definitely illegal to sneak across the border.
As stated....If you're truly seeking asylum there is nothing to hide from. Just go to an entry port and claim asylum.
If you're sneaking, you're sneaking for a reason. If you've got nothing to hide, you don't need to break the law.
Asylum from what?
There are absolutely advocacy groups working to swamp the court systems with asylum seekers to ensure the individuals are able to be released. They’re working the loopholes. Trumps enforcement of this as a crime (misdemeanor notwithstanding) which it absolutely is, is the counter to this action.
Definitely legal to seek asylum. Definitely illegal to sneak across the border.
As stated....If you're truly seeking asylum there is nothing to hide from. Just go to an entry port and claim asylum.
If you're sneaking, you're sneaking for a reason. If you've got nothing to hide, you don't need to break the law.
They are. And they are being turned away because these ports are purposely being understaffed to handle the crisis. Leaving them no other options. Again, this is info that most people following legitimate media know. There is only one group that continues to consistently be misinformed about the subject.
Isn't interesting how no one will touch the question of blanket amnesty in exchange for permanent suspension of all voting and social services privileges?
Doesn't their refusal to take that deal or honestly answer that question prove what the real intent is behind Leftists pushing them here illegally to ask for asylum?
Some of them are legitimately fleeing oppressive Government. They're Socialist! You don't want them staying there, and you claim this country is racist, sexist, homophobic and horribly infested with greedy Capitalists who exploit the poor and minorities. So why encourage them to come here? Why not encourage them to stay and thrive in those Socialist utopias you all desire promulgate the Earth one day?
I'm confused![]()
Agreed.
Isn’t it interesting that nobody cares to engage you with your ridiculous hypotheticals?
Is that what he said or does he say it’s up to the Dems to stop obstructing? It’s really the only card they have, but in this case, it can be used against them because of how dire they’re painting the situation. I think they’re overplaying their hand. They should want this discussion in Oct/Nov. as it stands, this can be solved before midterms and they’ll have to give in. They can’t not solve the problem the problem and if legislation is pushed, they’ll be in a tight box.
I know you can't answer. Truth to you folks is like pesticide to a roach infestation.