Nebraska a blue blood?

73 Red I

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2007
5,522
2,877
113
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
 
Jul 26, 2014
6,094
795
0
Probably because they only have a 57% winning percentage all time, whereas Nebraska is still sitting at 68.8%, despite being absolute poopoo 7 of the last 6 seasons.
 

Walleye 1

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2021
5,026
1,943
113
I think our own fan base are the only ones that considers them a blue blood nationally. All they have to hold on to is support and top ten wins all time (if that is where they still sit) I guess I'm not sure of that for sure.
 

steinek11

All-Conference
Apr 18, 2004
13,541
1,276
113
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
Blue blood status is at risk. You can't be at the bottom of your division in a sorry-*** conference and be respected.
 

Husker Hambone

Sophomore
Sep 15, 2013
1,023
144
0
Nebraska is definitely a blue blood. Natty’s, Heisman winners, conference championships, and finishing in top 25 for 48 straight F’ing years man!
 

beatdahuskers

Redshirt
Nov 15, 2006
112
6
0
UN lost the 'Has Been Bowl' and the two bits and broken chair trophy.
Doesn't one's blood turn blue when they are dying from lack of oxygen?
 

VictoryRed

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2004
20,246
3,126
113
Yes. Minny won those mythical NC's before there was TV, national audience, etc....give me a break.
 
Jul 4, 2016
8,269
3,870
0
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,509
20,878
113
I think our own fan base are the only ones that considers them a blue blood nationally. All they have to hold on to is support and top ten wins all time (if that is where they still sit) I guess I'm not sure of that for sure.

Completely false.
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,858
2,176
113
depends what meant as a blue blood.
mcbride said Huskers blood is red.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,473
2,015
113
I'm not someone who thinks blue blood status is lost easily, but the last 7 years has certainly accelerated the process. No other blue blood school in recent memory has entered near as bad of a stretch as we're going through currently. I used to think we were good for 20 years at bare minimum, but I'm starting to change my thinking on that. If the next 7 years is like the prior 7, I don't think hardly anyone will think of us as a blue blood.
 

yunginsNU2

All-Conference
May 24, 2006
4,737
1,030
0
UN lost the 'Has Been Bowl' and the two bits and broken chair trophy.
Doesn't one's blood turn blue when they are dying from lack of oxygen?
Doesnt a fan from abother school that creates a screen name like this guy did just to post on a Husker freeboard tell us everything to answer the above question?
 
Sep 6, 2012
379
0
0
I'd say it depends on your age. In today's day and age the term blueblood doesn't really have a lot of meaning. Someone in their 40's or older might still consider Nebraska a blueblood but everyone younger pretty much just knows Nebraska as a fair to middling football program. Ask a younger fan of college football outside of Nebraska which teams they consider a "blueblood" if you will and I'm willing to bet that at least 9 out of 10 won't mention Nebraska. They'll mention the teams that have been relevant over the past 20 years like Bama, OSU, Oklahoma, Clemson, LSU. Some will throw Texas and ND and maybe Penn St and Michigan in there but those are the brands that carry a lot of weight with the under 40's. The geographically challenged 30 and under crowd couldn't find Nebraska on a map and has no idea Nebraska was ever good at football.
 
Last edited:

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,255
11,315
113
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
Not this **** again….

Minnesota doesn’t have 7 national titles and Nebraska has 195 more wins than Minnesota..
Nebraska has also 46 conference titles Minnesota has 18👏🏼👏🏼..

Gophers have no national titles in modern 2 platoon football end of story…
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,858
2,176
113
Not this **** again….

Minnesota doesn’t have 7 national titles and Nebraska has 195 more wins than Minnesota..
Nebraska has also 46 conference titles Minnesota has 18👏🏼👏🏼..

Gophers have no national titles in modern 2 platoon football end of story…
minnsota has a back up kicker, probably qb......and a run blocking o-line
 
Jan 3, 2004
3,197
610
0
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
Nebraska is a blue blood due to its long-term, enduring football success. Minnesota is a blue blood mainly due to teamperature.
 
Apr 18, 2021
166
0
0
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
Neither are considered Blue Bloods by anyone under 90 years old.
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,858
2,176
113
by state ohio is#1....which says something...texas 4, we are 5..which is weird cause texas has alot of teams

we are #5!
 
Last edited:

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
This response is for Iowa fans living on our board, as well as uninformed Nebraska fans.

Any google search will show you that yes, Nebraska is still a blue blood.

If you’re curious, type in “blue bloods of college football” and Nebraska will be on 95 percent of the websites as a blue blood. Don’t take my word for it.

now, can we lose this status? Sure. Minnesota did. But it’s gonna be while yet before we get there.
 

ivan brunetti

Heisman
Nov 26, 2003
16,448
26,638
0
Yes. Minny won those mythical NC's before there was TV, national audience, etc....give me a break.

They still count. All time is all time.

Now, the Gophers do not measure up to Nebraska in things like overall winning percentage and wins. Those stats measure consistency and matter more than NCs.
 

Husker88

Senior
Dec 9, 2017
2,194
431
83
Not sure I really care anymore.

We laughed for years at Notre Dame being called a Blue Blood when they stunk. They've never stunk for 20 years like we have.

I'd rather rally around getting better, winning games, and supporting the program.

The negativity is old and tired.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
They still count. All time is all time.

Now, the Gophers do not measure up to Nebraska in things like overall winning percentage and wins. Those stats measure consistency and matter more than NCs.
I would say the sheer volume of conference championships also impress those who claim Nebraska as a blue blood… not to mention heisman/Outland/Lombardi trophy winners and all Americans.
 

ivan brunetti

Heisman
Nov 26, 2003
16,448
26,638
0
I would say the sheer volume of conference championships also impress those who claim Nebraska as a blue blood… not to mention heisman/Outland/Lombardi trophy winners and all Americans.

Conference championships are much easier to win depending on how large and how strong the conference. For example, USC is the only blue blood in the PAC and the closest all time great program they have in conference is Washington. Heisman is just a media driven star player on great team (usually, unless you are Paul Hornung). Consistent winning vs strong competition is the best gauge of all time greatness.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Conference championships are much easier to win depending on how large and how strong the conference. For example, USC is the only blue blood in the PAC and the closest all time great program they have in conference is Washington. Heisman is just a media driven star player on great team (usually, unless you are Paul Hornung). Consistent winning vs strong competition is the best gauge of all time greatness.
I agree, I’m just mentioning some of the other factors. 48 conference championships, even in a smaller conference, is impressive no matter how you slice it. When you add it all together, it enhances the winning.
 

B1G RED RULES

All-Conference
Sep 7, 2013
4,154
1,132
0
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
The Nebraska Blue Blood thing is just one of the little remaining shreds (like the sellout streak) we as a fan base desperately hang onto as we watch the program lose and continuously sink to new depths.

We had one hell of a streak at one time, but time marches on. Nearly 50 years since Devaney’s national championships and nearly 25 years since our last national championship. Over 2 decades without a conference championship and no hope in sight.

So yeah, if it makes us feel better - we’re a Blue Blood. And if anybody doesn’t believe it, I’ve got VCR tapes that will prove you wrong.
 

3 n out

Redshirt
Jul 12, 2016
118
9
13
Who cares and what difference does it make? So we can all feel better about our current situation? Whatever we were, we’re not that anymore.
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,858
2,176
113
I think you are in the wrong thread.
I'm more interested about that then talking bout hypothetical blue bloods.....the quickest way not to be a blue blood is have no kicker, back up qb or run blocking
 
Last edited:

VictoryRed

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2004
20,246
3,126
113
They still count. All time is all time.

Now, the Gophers do not measure up to Nebraska in things like overall winning percentage and wins. Those stats measure consistency and matter more than NCs.
If they count to you albeit. They don't carry much weight in the national press.
 

Rick.Shaw1

Freshman
May 29, 2001
8,283
83
0
At what point is a team no longer considered a football blue blood? Nebraska has five NC between 1970 and 1997. Minnesota claims seven starting in 1904 with the last in 1960. Why is Nebraska considered a blue blood and Minnesota not?
Yes they are. A top 20 job for sure IMO. Our fan base is second to none…in any sport. A Blue Blood still but another 10 years of losing could easily change that.