Comparing RU and ND and was thinking about this - wow. The BIG will obviously be regarded higher than the ACC, but NDs unbalanced schedule was insanely easy even on a relative basis.
They only had to play Duke, UNC, VTech, Miami and Wake once in conference play and then lost to VTech in their tourney (2-4 in those 6 games).
Consider this - they played 4 teams with worse NETs than Nebraska twice in conference play (8 games). They played another 2 games against UofL (worse NET than every BIG team except Nebraska). That was 10 of their 20 league games and they went 9-1 in those games.
Will the committee take notice or it will be 15-5 ACC team that beat UK (IN)?
They only had to play Duke, UNC, VTech, Miami and Wake once in conference play and then lost to VTech in their tourney (2-4 in those 6 games).
Consider this - they played 4 teams with worse NETs than Nebraska twice in conference play (8 games). They played another 2 games against UofL (worse NET than every BIG team except Nebraska). That was 10 of their 20 league games and they went 9-1 in those games.
Will the committee take notice or it will be 15-5 ACC team that beat UK (IN)?
