From the El Dorado News-Times:
Van Horn said he considered having Trevor Ezell bunt, but decided to let him swing away with Texas Tech’s infielders charging in at the corners. He said that if Ezell had laid down a sacrifice bunt, Casey Martin might be walked intentionally to set up a double play or strike out — which he did for third time in the game.
“I just didn’t feel good about bunting one of my best hitters,” Van Horn said. “I just felt like the key at-bat was going to be Trevor.”
—-
Definitely a bad call by the coach not to have his lead off hitter (Ezell) sacrifice bunt once the 8 and 9 hitters got on base with nobody out.
Casey Martin bats #2 in the lineup and had already had two extra base hits in the game. So why would you not want your hottest hitter at the plate with one out and the tying and winning runs in scoring position? Even if Texas Tech decides to walk Martin to set up a force play at any base, or a possible double play, you still have your #3 hitter at the plate with the bases loaded and only one out.
Definitely Seems like the coach got greedy there, playing for a big inning, when by far the most important thing was to score the tying run.