Toggle sidebar

NCAA not listing Herro?

X

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
Is there a requirement for number of attempts to be listed? Maybe he didn’t shoot enough.
 
A

Anon No More

Sophomore
Sep 10, 2013
177
163
18
HagginHall1999 said:
Yeah, makes no sense.

93 total is more than 79, right?

But 93 brings up a good point...this is another reason why Tyler should come back to school. He should be at the line WAY more often- needs to be a primary weapon, 8 to 10 times a game.
Click to expand...


It’s based on per game not season total. The guy with 79 only played in 25 games
3.16 att per game
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow
Z

zcats

Heisman
May 29, 2001
39,089
42,237
98
It is amazing that he doesn't get more FT. I think he doesn't try to get guys to foul him. When he is guarded tightly he just stops shooting like he did in the tournament. He did not finish well in the tournament.
 
R

Rideordiewildcat

Heisman
Jan 30, 2018
16,155
24,636
0
Herro made 87 of 93. The guy #1 on this list only attempted 79 and made 73, WTF?! Tyler should be #1.

https://www.ncaa.com/stats/basketball-men/d1/current/individual/142


edit: So it's because Herro didn't avg. enough attempts per game. That is whack. You either make them or you don't on the season. What a dumbass rule if true. He made more and attempted more than the guy in first. Nice Loop hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow and hotelblue
HagginHall1999

HagginHall1999

Heisman
Oct 19, 2018
16,085
28,594
113
Time4Nine said:
It’s based on per game not season total. The guy with 79 only played in 25 games
3.16 att per game
Click to expand...

I understand that. I mean that Herro should be averaging 8 or so a game. More aggressive, using pump fakes, etc.

Maybe just a bit more crafty which comes with experience.
 
J

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
It's ESPN 93 attempts is a large enough sample size. Its not like he went 9-10
 
M

mjj_2K

All-American
Jul 11, 2010
12,450
7,028
113
JC CATS said:
It's ESPN 93 attempts is a large enough sample size. Its not like he went 9-10
Click to expand...
No, it's the NCAA.

And they didn't create that standard just to spite UK and Tyler Herro. It's been the standard for decades. Stop with the persecution complex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoyKent
H

Habiki

Redshirt
Jun 22, 2009
342
26
0
I didn't think it was a conspiracy or anything. Just thought it was odd that he was omitted, and didn't understand why.

Appreciate the clarification everyone gave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow
J

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
mj2k10 said:
No, it's the NCAA.

And they didn't create that standard just to spite UK and Tyler Herro. It's been the standard for decades. Stop with the persecution complex.
Click to expand...
A little sensitive are we, lol? It is ridiculous to shoot 100 free throws regardless of team and that's not a big enough sample size to determine. It is also laughable that this has offended you
 
jrpross_rivals

jrpross_rivals

Heisman
Feb 21, 2008
17,561
36,107
113
It’s not a Kentucky conspiracy but it is kind of dumb that because someone played in fewer games that he gets counted even though he shot fewer times than a guy that played in all the games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow and JC CATS
M

mjj_2K

All-American
Jul 11, 2010
12,450
7,028
113
JC CATS said:
A little sensitive are we, lol? It is ridiculous to shoot 100 free throws regardless of team and that's not a big enough sample size to determine. It is also laughable that this has offended you
Click to expand...
No, you're 100% right. And it was all ESPN or the NCAA, and they're both out to get us anyway, so what's the difference?

And whoever it was hired someone who can see the future 30 or more years ago to set a standard for this statistical category that they knew, 30 or 40 or 50 years in the future, Tyler Herro would jusssst miss out on.

And if it was a Duke or UNC player, they'd change the stupid standard just so that their player could qualify. We all know it.

Does that make you feel better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC CATS
J

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
mj2k10 said:
No, you're 100% right. And it was all ESPN or the NCAA, and they're both out to get us anyway, so what's the difference?

And whoever it was hired someone who can see the future 30 or more years ago to set a standard for this statistical category that they knew, 30 or 40 or 50 years in the future, Tyler Herro would jusssst miss out on.

And if it was a Duke or UNC player, they'd change the stupid standard just so that their player could qualify. We all know it.

Does that make you feel better?
Click to expand...
Now we are talking :scream:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow
J

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
ABlockalypseBrow said:
It’s clear no one thinks this is a conspiracy, but in case anyone is wondering this has been the standard for years. It would be weird for there to be a conspiracy against the player on our team that was hyped more than anyone by announcers imo (even perhaps over his NPOY candidate teammate).

https://web.archive.org/web/2018010...tats/basketball-men/d1/current/individual/142
Click to expand...
I don't think it is a conspiracy I just think if you shoot nearly 100 FT's that should qualify you. That's all I was saying @mj2k10
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom