My words, Klay Thompson

klong-dog

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2012
2,139
175
63
Yeah that's stupid there. I'd say he was beyond en fuego.


Finished with 52. 11 for 15 in 3's.
 
Last edited:

Hankp22

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2012
1,060
0
0
He is awesome

He has transformed his game and is now one of the NBA elites. He has one of the quickest releases I've seen. And people think of him as a shooter, but he has now become a scorer. He can put the ball on the floor and finish.

The NBA is awesome right now. It is great to see teams like GST, ATL, Portland, MEM, and WSH at the top of their divisions. All of them play solid team basketball. There is a youth movement taking place in the league. It will be interesting to see how they hold up in the 2nd half/playoffs.

For the record, GST is paying Curry/Thomspon around a combined total of $15 million this year. Thompson's salary will increase to $15 million next year when his new deal goes into effect. With that in mind, GST will get two years out of the Curry/Thomspon combo for what the Heat will get out of only Chris Bosh.
 
Last edited:

DAWG61

Redshirt
Feb 26, 2008
10,111
0
0
He has transformed his game and is now one of the NBA elites. He has one of the quickest releases I've seen. And people think of him as a shooter, but he has now become a scorer. He can put the ball on the floor and finish.

The NBA is awesome right now. It is great to see teams like GST, ATL, Portland, MEM, and WSH at the top of their divisions. All of them play solid team basketball. There is a youth movement taking place in the league. It will be interesting to see how they hold up in the 2nd half/playoffs.

For the record, GST is paying Curry/Thomspon around a combined total of $15 million this year. Thompson's salary will increase to $15 million next year when his new deal goes into effect. With that in mind, GST will get two years out of the Curry/Thomspon combo for what the Heat will get out of only Chris Bosh.

And $10 mill less than just Kobe.
 

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,782
24,668
113
He's a beast. I remeber thinking when we played him "that's the best player we'll face all year".
 

DerHntr

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2007
16,209
3,714
113
That was a thing of beauty. Definitely would have been awesome to witness it live.
 

klong-dog

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2012
2,139
175
63
Ugh sickening. Couldn't believe what I was hearing while listening to Jack. Then seeing highlights later that night, unbelievable. Most were 10-15 ft behind the 3 pt line too.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,761
8,186
113
There is a youth movement taking place in the league. It will be interesting to see how they hold up in the 2nd half/playoffs.

It makes me feel really old to think that guys like Kobe, KG, Zebo, and even LeBron are the old men in the league now
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,761
8,186
113
And it also makes your realize how unbelievable good our team was that year. That was a game against a very good Vandy team(I think on the road) and it also included Foster going completely unconscious, yet we still were within inches of winning that game. Didn't it go to OT?

Seriously, that MSU squad was team that could have won the national title. 17ing Xavier
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
You're off by four years. The Foster game was in 08. We did have a great team that year but in typical fashion we pissed away too many of them including losing to UGA in front of about 100 people at Georgia Tech, and ended up an 8 seed that lost to Memphis in the second round.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,761
8,186
113
Ahh, that's right. It was the last year of Gordon/Rhodes. I remembered that we had been steamrolling through the schedule up to that point which made me think it was the '05 year, but we had a hell of a roster in '08 as well. Gordon, Rhodes, Varnado, Hansbrough, and Stewart... If we hadn't gotten completely hosed in the NCAAs by that little 17er, Willie Kemp, who knows how far they would have gone
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
It's much easier to be the best when you don't have to play the best in the second round.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
How much of your fantasy football winnings would you bet if I told you Willie Kemp only hit one shot in the second half of that game?
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
Well

that's your opinion. I'm of the opinion that they're all good teams by that point, capable of beating anyone.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,339
33,065
113
But you don't have to beat the best to make it to the Sweet Sixteen unless you piss away games you have no excuse losing. There's no reason that team should have been playing a top seed in the 2nd round.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,339
33,065
113
We get it. You're OK with losing to the worst team in the SEC when they had already played 45 minutes that morning. I wasn't then, and I'm still not.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
Now you're just

completely straw-manning it...or just a complete swing and a miss on reading comprehension.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,761
8,186
113
My memory's not good enough anymore to dispute that, but I can most definitely recall him going 4-5 from downtown which was an utter anomaly for him. It also felt 14 out of 15 because none of their other players could really get anything going throughout the entire game. Without Kemp winning the random ******* award for the day, we win that game easily.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
Sure, they are all good. But there's a difference in playing an elite team who is a 1 seed and a good team who is a 4 seed. To deny there is a difference in the second round is impossible.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
The difference

can be so negligible on any given night, that's it's impossible to say. So many factors are involved.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
Check the statistics on how often 1 seeds win at least two games in the tournament. Everyone knows they've never lost to a 16. The losses to 8/9 teams, while memorable, are very infrequent. Your odds of advancing are not good when you have to play them in the second round. Then compare that to how often 3's, 4's and 5's win at least two games. Much less often. One seeds are one seeds for a reason. They are the most elite teams in the country.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
I get it. That makes for good fanspeak and coachspeak. But "beating who is put in front of you" is more achievable when you don't piss away your seeding in the regular season.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
You can call it what you want,

but it's the truth. You have to beat a top team at some point. I woukd hope our teams' goal is a little higher than just making the "sweet sixteen."
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
Yes I'm glad you agree

It's common sense that you are going to have to beat who is in front of you. Keep crying, though.
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
11,192
2,329
113
You're totally grasping. Everyone agrees you have to play who's in front of you. Everyone except you apparently also agrees that making your path as easy as possible by having a higher seed is a good thing. Funny you don't see Coach K, Pitino, Roy Williams, Calipari, Izzo and others just farting around in the regular season and being happy with an 8 seed.
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Basketball Xavier 81-63 Mississippi State: Distance shooting hurts Bulldogs in Greenbrier defeat
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Kickoff Time Change: Mississippi State vs. Auburn
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Keys to Victory vs. Auburn
  4. 04 Rivals Basketball Recruiting 4-star center Chris Brown commits to Mississippi State
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Auburn Q and A