Via Charles Bloom:
"This morning, Rogers viewed the video from ESPN and has not seen the video that will be sent in by Mississippi State yet. It is the assumption that the video from ESPN is the only video that the replay official would have seen. While indicating that the play is very close, Rogers felt that, based on the video evidence, that the call could not either be confirmed or changed. Thus, the call on the field stood due to lack of evidence on video replay. Rogers did indicate that the play was close enough it should have been reviewed."
The corrupt SEC office will probably just cut-n-paste it from the UH game. That UH statement also should question WHY did MSU have to use a timeout to have that play reviewed. Shouldn't the officials asked for the replay? Mistake, followed by mistake, that is the way of the SEC.
"This morning, Rogers viewed the video from ESPN and has not seen the video that will be sent in by Mississippi State yet. It is the assumption that the video from ESPN is the only video that the replay official would have seen. While indicating that the play is very close, Rogers felt that, based on the video evidence, that the call could not either be confirmed or changed. Thus, the call on the field stood due to lack of evidence on video replay. Rogers did indicate that the play was close enough it should have been reviewed."
The corrupt SEC office will probably just cut-n-paste it from the UH game. That UH statement also should question WHY did MSU have to use a timeout to have that play reviewed. Shouldn't the officials asked for the replay? Mistake, followed by mistake, that is the way of the SEC.
