Mullen's contract extension is done....

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,455
5,481
113
Someone who post on Nafoom please go over and let them know this has happened. They had a nice long thread about mullen and not signing an extension. The conclusion was that since he sucks so bad there was no need to extend him because no one else wants him.
 

snoopdog

Freshman
Mar 25, 2008
1,330
81
48
$25k behind The Beave? Seems odd.
The average is 25 K behind Freeze's 4.3 mil, but I think I read where Mullen is getting 4 mil this season, so his salary the remaining 3 seasons may actually top Freeze.
 

coach66

Junior
Mar 5, 2009
12,719
343
83
No need, they are already discussing

What a loser he is 100 different ways. He bothers them.
 

Joe Schmedlap

Redshirt
Aug 11, 2010
1,334
33
48
I'm thinking both schools overpaid, but not by a huge margin. 3.8 to 4 million dollars is the cost of employing a somewhat proven coach in the SEC Western Division.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,339
33,065
113
Based on what both have done to date and where our programs were when they were hired, we're both getting a huge bargain.
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,665
16,679
113
If everyone is overpaying, then that's the market value. It's not overpaying at that point.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,760
8,186
113
Could not possibly agree more. When Dan Mullen took over in '09, our football revenue was $36.6M. In 2013, it was $62.7M and while I don't believe that the number has been made official for last season yet, I can say with 100% assurance that it will dwarf 2013's figure.

Granted, there are plenty of other people outside of Dan Mullen that deserve credit for this, but he has been the voice and face of MSU during this period. I do not believe that this level of growth and success would have been possible without him, so I fully endorse him getting his piece of the pie
 

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,782
24,668
113
One could probably make the same case for Mullen-MSU. He's done great things for our program, and 2014 brought us invaluable publicity on a national level.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,339
33,065
113
The President of the UA Board of Trustees was quoted a year or so ago that Nick Saban is the best financial investment UA has made in its history. Out of state enrollment has almost tripled since he was hired.
 

seshomoru

Senior
Apr 24, 2006
5,661
454
83
Yeah... you go ahead and give Scott a call.

Ask him why it took almost TWO months to work out a multi-million dollar four year deal. I mean there is only FOUR months until FYE! They got it done by the skin of their teeth.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
15,275
5,813
113
I'm thinking both schools overpaid, but not by a huge margin. 3.8 to 4 million dollars is the cost of employing a somewhat proven coach in the SEC Western Division.

I don't think either school overpaid based on results so far. I think we made a much safer bet than UM and that UM may have overpaid compared to the shape their program is in.

Dan has established his program and shown steady improvement and also by and large had players that stayed out of trouble. There's no glaring problems ahead. We are going to be solid unless he has just misevaluated recruits.

Bucky on the other hand has is still young enough in his time at UM that he could still flame out pretty easily. He's relying on a JUCO transfer to be his QB, after that QB has been kicked off another DI team and when he couldn't even manage to go from signing to spring practice without getting arrested. He still doesn't seem to have an O-line in place. He's got players that seem to have questionable attitudes, so it's not clear what would happen to the team if they take a big step back next year b/c of lack of qb or O-line play. I expect Freeze to continue to be good. It's not a huge red flag to not have an O-Line in year three; Mullen certainly didn't. But I thought Nutt was going to continue to be solid also and I would still say that UM got played b/c they are on the hook again, for big money, for a coach still young in his career that wasn't going anywhere if they didn't offer.

I h ave no doubt we could have signed Mullen for $3.8M and he would have signed the deal (or maybe just kept his current one), but after all he has done for State why not pay him market? We'd just ensure that he left next chance he got. And how ever many jobs he has turned down, he's certainly had at least one if not two good job prospects that he killed because he went in their making it clear that they were going to have to make a strong offer to get him to leave MSU, so he definitely hasn't been dying for a chance to go anywhere different.
 
Last edited:

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
22,665
16,679
113
Even if there is a bubble, what do you do? Go hire Brady Hoke or Hudspeth at $2M/year? And until you can prove that a bubble can even exist within CFB coaches salaries, it's a moot point. I honestly think the thought of it is silly. Housing and gas prices deeply effect all of us. The salary of a coach really doesn't. Ok, ticket prices went up 10%. But it's such a minute portion of most people's expenses that its hard to imagine the increase will have much impact. For some it may be the straw that breaks the camel's back, but most of us will shrug it off.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,073
54
48
Could not possibly agree more. When Dan Mullen took over in '09, our football revenue was $36.6M. In 2013, it was $62.7M and while I don't believe that the number has been made official for last season yet, I can say with 100% assurance that it will dwarf 2013's figure.

Granted, there are plenty of other people outside of Dan Mullen that deserve credit for this, but he has been the voice and face of MSU during this period. I do not believe that this level of growth and success would have been possible without him, so I fully endorse him getting his piece of the pie

How much of that increase is due the the SEC Network deal alone?
 

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,455
5,481
113
Unless it's a bubble that's forming i.e. gas prices and 2006 homes.

How would a bubble be forming? Is interest in college football artificially driving up viewership on TV or the price of advertising during football games?

There is no bubble forming. College football could have always been what it is now it just took TV time to realize that.
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
How would a bubble be forming? Is interest in college football artificially driving up viewership on TV or the price of advertising during football games?

There is no bubble forming. College football could have always been what it is now it just took TV time to realize that.

Uh, yes there is. Interest in college football is driving up viewership/attendance and the price of advertising during the football games. But when those gas prices and home prices burst, money to sports follows right along.

Take Nascar for instance. The recession combined with the Jimmie Johnson era really crippled the sport.
 

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,455
5,481
113
Uh, yes there is. Interest in college football is driving up viewership/attendance and the price of advertising during the football games. But when those gas prices and home prices burst, money to sports follows right along.

Take Nascar for instance. The recession combined with the Jimmie Johnson era really crippled the sport.

Yeah college football really took a nosedive since 2008. Hell MSU attendance has increased since the recession started, as has most of the south. NASCAR is not even remotely comparable to football. Football is the most popular sport in America. NASCAR is what 5 or 6. Maybe higher in the south.
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,760
8,186
113
Since I don't believe that full SEC network financial details have ever been fully disclosed, I don't know that answer to that, but I'm betting that it's not as much of it as you'd think.

Per USA Today, here are the details concerning the jump from 2009 to 2013

Ticket Sales: $7.6M to $11.4M
BC Contributions: $6.4M to $16.9M
Rights/Licensing: $13.2M to $27.6M

Now, a portion of the jump in Rights/Licensing definitely has to do with the new ESPN deal that signed back in 2008. However, it was only worth roughly $10M/year for each school in total so it's not like it accounted for the entire increase in rights/licensing. Apparel sales and licensing has a lot to do with that number as well

I don't know where 2014 ended up as compared to the $62.7M that we saw in '13, but I'll throw a prediction of ~ $75M out there.
 

tbaydog

All-American
Feb 25, 2008
3,040
5,755
113
I really would like to know the reason for the delay, everyone knew was going to get 4 plus. Whats in there that we don't know??
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
Yeah college football really took a nosedive since 2008. Hell MSU attendance has increased since the recession started, as has most of the south. NASCAR is not even remotely comparable to football. Football is the most popular sport in America. NASCAR is what 5 or 6. Maybe higher in the south.

Don't be an dubmass. Read my post before you put on your asshat. Do you remember where MSU football was in 2008? Nowhere to go but up. You say college football, but you are equating that with the SEC. Many programs operate in the red. Only now - after 7 years - are the traditional powers in other conferences catching up. Same can be said of the Miss. teams.

After the death of Dale Earnhardt (2001), Nascar was the most viewed spectator sport in America. Nascar is driven by sponsorship money and that dried up in 2008. There's a correlation between the rise of football and the decline of Nascar. Football is as much a southern dominated sport as Nascar.
 

ronpolk

All-American
May 6, 2009
9,455
5,481
113
Don't be an dubmass. Read my post before you put on your asshat. Do you remember where MSU football was in 2008? Nowhere to go but up. You say college football, but you are equating that with the SEC. Many programs operate in the red. Only now - after 7 years - are the traditional powers in other conferences catching up. Same can be said of the Miss. teams.

After the death of Dale Earnhardt (2001), Nascar was the most viewed spectator sport in America. Nascar is driven by sponsorship money and that dried up in 2008. There's a correlation between the rise of football and the decline of Nascar. Football is as much a southern dominated sport as Nascar.

Your point might make more sense if we were talking about just MSU. However, college football as a whole as boomed during the recession.

Feel free to rub it in my face when the college football "bubble burst".

Still your nascar talk is dumb. The Daytona 500 is always watched by a lot of people because there are no other sporting events happening. If the Daytona 500 that Earnhardt died in was head to head with the sec chsmpionship it wouldn't be watched by nearly as many people.
 
Last edited:
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Basketball Xavier 81-63 Mississippi State: Distance shooting hurts Bulldogs in Greenbrier defeat
  2. 02 Maroon and White Football Kickoff Time Change: Mississippi State vs. Auburn
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Keys to Victory vs. Auburn
  4. 04 Rivals Basketball Recruiting 4-star center Chris Brown commits to Mississippi State
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Auburn Q and A