Mike Anderson Post Game thoughts.

Clive Gollings

All-Conference
Nov 10, 2014
6,004
4,725
0
Opening statement …
“First off, I thought before half, I thought it was a tremendous effort by our guys. Kentucky is a great team, we know that. Cal has probably one of his more talented teams here and I thought our guys fought toe to toe in the first half, but we all know the game is 40 minutes. We didn’t do our part in the second half. They continued to do what they do in the second half and the thing that glares out in my mind was I thought the game would be won in the paint. The true form it was between transition baskets they got in the second half and then the first half – they won in the paint, got offensive rebounds and then they shot 40 free throws. You shoot 40 free throws, you’re going to win a lot of games. I know they want to clean it up, but that’s just going to another level. It was a physical ballgame, and I know that. But, hats off to them. I thought (De’Aaron) Fox did a good job of controlling the game – and (Derek) Willis – the guy that keeps haunting us. Last year he haunted us at Bud Walton Arena, and tonight he haunted us as well. He’s one of those stretch guys – and it just seems like I go and watch games and he don’t shoot it like that – but when the Razorbacks show up, he lights it up. We’ll learn from it. We’ve got a team that is still learning how to play in an environment like this. You haven’t seen the best of the Razorbacks yet.”

On if he was happy with the way that his players contained Malik Monk …
“We lost the game. I’m not satisfied. We lost the game. This is Arkansas versus the University of Kentucky. This is not Arkansas versus Malik Monk. Monk is a hell of a player. We know that. I don’t think I would have recruited him since the ninth grade if I didn’t think he was a hell of a player, so let’s get past that. This is Arkansas versus Kentucky.”

On the play in the second half involving Jaylen Barford …
“I didn’t see what happened, but it caused the guy who was playing the best on our basketball team in foul trouble because they called a technical foul and then a personal foul, so I don’t know. I don’t know if something was said. I’ll have to look at the replay. It started off like maybe they called a charge. I think if cooler heads contained themselves then I think you say this is something you call a technical on both guys. We’ve got a hell of a game going on and the kid was playing well, so I haven’t seen it – but obviously I’m biased and I don’t agree with the call. It is what it is, and that had nothing to do with the outcome of the game. Kentucky is an outstanding team and they did what they needed to do. In the conference race, you’ve got to defend your home court and they did that.”

On the balance of Kentucky’s offensive attack …
“That’s what I’m saying – people want to talk about Monk. (Bam) Adebeyo, what about him? (Isaiah) Briscoe, in the second half I thought he was better. Like I said, Willis, Monk is a big part of it, so you pay attention to him and that’s part of the strategy. I don’t think people understand that. You pick on him and then other guys might get off. I hope you guys cover basketball enough to understand that. From that standpoint, that’s kudos to Cal. He got a couple fouls early on in the second half and we had to find out where he was, but I thought it allowed a lot of other guys to get to the offensive boards, and I thought they were a lot tougher going down the stretch than our guys.”

On Anton Beard’s lack of productivity compared to Arkansas’ last game …

“Well, I’m sure. He’s been in treatment ever since the last time we were at home. He’s playing on a lot of guts right now. He’s not 100 percent, but a lot of players aren’t 100 percent. He came in and gave us a lot of things on defense. We just seem a much calmer team when he’s on the floor. Obviously, we would have used some scoring and that’s what happened. We had a drought. We had a drought there in the second half and we just needed some scoring. Whether it would be him or whether it would be Dusty Hannahs. We asked (inaudible) to score inside and we missed some lay-ups. Trey Thompson had a couple going down the stretch, but at the end of the day consistency is what we are trying to find with these guys. It’s like with (Jaylen) Barford before half, he’s there, the second half it gets turned over and the foul trouble and it just kind of goes that way. With our team, we have to have certain guys play well and with Kentucky, I don’t think it was an off night, but (Monk) didn’t give you the points that he normally gives you. But it came from other guys. That’s why it’s called T-E-A-M.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random UK Fan

Sithlyone

All-Conference
Apr 12, 2012
2,086
1,501
0
He's a bit salty at the officiating and Monk. However they played a great game and he is a good coach. Coaches have super egos and some of them don't handle losing as well as others. Someone catching you 5 seconds after being pounded after feeling you had a chance to win at half time can be a bit overwhelming and I can see why some coaches don't respond well in that situation.

Heard an interview the other day saying that they wished they would get rid of the handshake line and after considering it I don't think we need it. Non of those players/coaches really care about it and the losing team is being forced to show an act of graciousness when they really don't feel that way.

As kids I can see why you do it, you want to teach them about sportsmanship and such but at this level it is just a platitude that is outdated. MLB does it well, where the teams congratulate themselves if they want, but they don't force the losing team to congratulate them.
 
Oct 9, 2015
14,029
37,174
78
 

Anon1629331216

Redshirt
Mar 28, 2010
91
10
0
Opening statement …
“First off, I thought before half, I thought it was a tremendous effort by our guys. Kentucky is a great team, we know that. Cal has probably one of his more talented teams here and I thought our guys fought toe to toe in the first half, but we all know the game is 40 minutes. We didn’t do our part in the second half. They continued to do what they do in the second half and the thing that glares out in my mind was I thought the game would be won in the paint. The true form it was between transition baskets they got in the second half and then the first half – they won in the paint, got offensive rebounds and then they shot 40 free throws. You shoot 40 free throws, you’re going to win a lot of games. I know they want to clean it up, but that’s just going to another level. It was a physical ballgame, and I know that. But, hats off to them. I thought (De’Aaron) Fox did a good job of controlling the game – and (Derek) Willis – the guy that keeps haunting us. Last year he haunted us at Bud Walton Arena, and tonight he haunted us as well. He’s one of those stretch guys – and it just seems like I go and watch games and he don’t shoot it like that – but when the Razorbacks show up, he lights it up. We’ll learn from it. We’ve got a team that is still learning how to play in an environment like this. You haven’t seen the best of the Razorbacks yet.”

On if he was happy with the way that his players contained Malik Monk …
“We lost the game. I’m not satisfied. We lost the game. This is Arkansas versus the University of Kentucky. This is not Arkansas versus Malik Monk. Monk is a hell of a player. We know that. I don’t think I would have recruited him since the ninth grade if I didn’t think he was a hell of a player, so let’s get past that. This is Arkansas versus Kentucky.”

On the play in the second half involving Jaylen Barford …
“I didn’t see what happened, but it caused the guy who was playing the best on our basketball team in foul trouble because they called a technical foul and then a personal foul, so I don’t know. I don’t know if something was said. I’ll have to look at the replay. It started off like maybe they called a charge. I think if cooler heads contained themselves then I think you say this is something you call a technical on both guys. We’ve got a hell of a game going on and the kid was playing well, so I haven’t seen it – but obviously I’m biased and I don’t agree with the call. It is what it is, and that had nothing to do with the outcome of the game. Kentucky is an outstanding team and they did what they needed to do. In the conference race, you’ve got to defend your home court and they did that.”

On the balance of Kentucky’s offensive attack …
“That’s what I’m saying – people want to talk about Monk. (Bam) Adebeyo, what about him? (Isaiah) Briscoe, in the second half I thought he was better. Like I said, Willis, Monk is a big part of it, so you pay attention to him and that’s part of the strategy. I don’t think people understand that. You pick on him and then other guys might get off. I hope you guys cover basketball enough to understand that. From that standpoint, that’s kudos to Cal. He got a couple fouls early on in the second half and we had to find out where he was, but I thought it allowed a lot of other guys to get to the offensive boards, and I thought they were a lot tougher going down the stretch than our guys.”

On Anton Beard’s lack of productivity compared to Arkansas’ last game …

“Well, I’m sure. He’s been in treatment ever since the last time we were at home. He’s playing on a lot of guts right now. He’s not 100 percent, but a lot of players aren’t 100 percent. He came in and gave us a lot of things on defense. We just seem a much calmer team when he’s on the floor. Obviously, we would have used some scoring and that’s what happened. We had a drought. We had a drought there in the second half and we just needed some scoring. Whether it would be him or whether it would be Dusty Hannahs. We asked (inaudible) to score inside and we missed some lay-ups. Trey Thompson had a couple going down the stretch, but at the end of the day consistency is what we are trying to find with these guys. It’s like with (Jaylen) Barford before half, he’s there, the second half it gets turned over and the foul trouble and it just kind of goes that way. With our team, we have to have certain guys play well and with Kentucky, I don’t think it was an off night, but (Monk) didn’t give you the points that he normally gives you. But it came from other guys. That’s why it’s called T-E-A-M.”
 

Anon1629331216

Redshirt
Mar 28, 2010
91
10
0
Arkansas coach is a total prick at a no class program. They deserve each other and need to leave the SEC. Conference would be much better without that stupid bunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf and ORCAT

Aike

Heisman
Mar 17, 2002
75,427
46,317
90
He's a bit salty at the officiating and Monk. However they played a great game and he is a good coach. Coaches have super egos and some of them don't handle losing as well as others. Someone catching you 5 seconds after being pounded after feeling you had a chance to win at half time can be a bit overwhelming and I can see why some coaches don't respond well in that situation.

Heard an interview the other day saying that they wished they would get rid of the handshake line and after considering it I don't think we need it. Non of those players/coaches really care about it and the losing team is being forced to show an act of graciousness when they really don't feel that way.

As kids I can see why you do it, you want to teach them about sportsmanship and such but at this level it is just a platitude that is outdated. MLB does it well, where the teams congratulate themselves if they want, but they don't force the losing team to congratulate them.

Who played a great game? Arkansas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random UK Fan

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
He's a jerk comes by it naturally from his mentor Nolan "respect me" Richardson
Anderson is a jerk. We know that. But what's the problem with this interview? How many times does he have to say Kentucky is a great team? He complimented Fox, Briscoe, Willis. He didn't take the bait when the interviewer tried to lead him into criticizing Monk. Arkansas was soundly beaten, and Anderson's job is to move on to the next game. He isn't a Kentucky fan. I don't know what you guys expect from him.
 

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,930
13,848
113
Anderson hates everything Kentucky, losing and Cal having to call out one of his players just eat him up. He will never be respected or known for being a good coach because of his whinny attitude and his almost sprint like blow by's when he loses. Not good sportsmanship, Does he do that when they win or does he stop and want to talk?
 

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
He's a bit salty at the officiating and Monk. However they played a great game and he is a good coach. Coaches have super egos and some of them don't handle losing as well as others. Someone catching you 5 seconds after being pounded after feeling you had a chance to win at half time can be a bit overwhelming and I can see why some coaches don't respond well in that situation.

Heard an interview the other day saying that they wished they would get rid of the handshake line and after considering it I don't think we need it. Non of those players/coaches really care about it and the losing team is being forced to show an act of graciousness when they really don't feel that way.

As kids I can see why you do it, you want to teach them about sportsmanship and such but at this level it is just a platitude that is outdated. MLB does it well, where the teams congratulate themselves if they want, but they don't force the losing team to congratulate them.
Do it before the game,right after the buzzer that ends warm-ups
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf

awf

Heisman
May 31, 2006
10,411
20,774
0
The hand shake line is like an old nun I had in grade school. She would whip my *** and then demand that I thank her for it. Basketball is the same. You have to shake hands and basically thank the team that beat you for doing it.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random UK Fan

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,871
69,823
67
Anderson is a jerk. We know that. But what's the problem with this interview? How many times does he have to say Kentucky is a great team? He complimented Fox, Briscoe, Willis. He didn't take the bait when the interviewer tried to lead him into criticizing Monk. Arkansas was soundly beaten, and Anderson's job is to move on to the next game. He isn't a Kentucky fan. I don't know what you guys expect from him.

maybe it's just because I can't stand the guy, but he did come across as a little whiny to me, not to mention he got a few digs in. I got the impression that he was saying they could've had a chance if it weren't for that call on his player, and other officiating that led to us shooting 40 FTs. But, again, I admit I'm biased against the SOB.
:sunglasses:
 

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,871
69,823
67
He's a bit salty at the officiating and Monk. However they played a great game and he is a good coach. Coaches have super egos and some of them don't handle losing as well as others. Someone catching you 5 seconds after being pounded after feeling you had a chance to win at half time can be a bit overwhelming and I can see why some coaches don't respond well in that situation.

Heard an interview the other day saying that they wished they would get rid of the handshake line and after considering it I don't think we need it. Non of those players/coaches really care about it and the losing team is being forced to show an act of graciousness when they really don't feel that way.

As kids I can see why you do it, you want to teach them about sportsmanship and such but at this level it is just a platitude that is outdated. MLB does it well, where the teams congratulate themselves if they want, but they don't force the losing team to congratulate them.

I think a handshake line to begin the game is a good idea - a kind of good luck to you, let's have a good game thing. But after, I agree, it's not necessary. I do think the coaches should shake after a game though, just not the team.
 

bluedog79

All-American
Mar 4, 2008
6,015
5,290
0
Anderson plays the part of Nolan Richardson pretty good. He needs better recruiting prowess with the 1 spot and the 3. He could win if he had a top point guard.
Nolan had Scotty Thurman.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
He's a bit salty at the officiating and Monk. However they played a great game and he is a good coach. Coaches have super egos and some of them don't handle losing as well as others. Someone catching you 5 seconds after being pounded after feeling you had a chance to win at half time can be a bit overwhelming and I can see why some coaches don't respond well in that situation.

Heard an interview the other day saying that they wished they would get rid of the handshake line and after considering it I don't think we need it. Non of those players/coaches really care about it and the losing team is being forced to show an act of graciousness when they really don't feel that way.

As kids I can see why you do it, you want to teach them about sportsmanship and such but at this level it is just a platitude that is outdated. MLB does it well, where the teams congratulate themselves if they want, but they don't force the losing team to congratulate them.


When we lose sportsmanship we lose sports because then there's no respect on the field or floor at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

Sithlyone

All-Conference
Apr 12, 2012
2,086
1,501
0
When we lose sportsmanship we lose sports because then there's no respect on the field or floor at all.
I dont disagree with you. However a handshake line isnt sportsmanship.

MLB, NFL, NHL and other sports dont make their players participate in handshake lines.
 

3kidsandme

Heisman
Jan 12, 2013
7,345
10,353
113
So barford hurt them because he got a bad call for stomping a dude? Monk was taken out in first half on bs touch fouls. Barford cancelling Monk a huge win for Ark
 
May 4, 2009
5,370
325
0
If the powers in control don't want to get rid of it then why not change the handshake routine to before the game instead of afterwards. Emotions can sometimes be too high at the end of a game.
I remember my high school team and a district rival once had a big fight after a game, and it originated in the handshake line when one boy pushed another with his shoulder and flipped him around as he walked past him. All hell broke lose after that with punches thrown and a few hurt. Parents also got involved. It took 10 minutes to break it up by police and others. All due to a post game handshake after an emotional game.
 
Mar 28, 2014
381
649
0
Is Anderson the coach that Cal was referring to when he made the, "It doesn't matter how long you've been recruiting a kid, if I want him, I'm going to come in and get him and there is nothing you can do about it." statement?
 

jameslee32

Heisman
Mar 26, 2009
33,664
22,359
83
All I can say is when refs ask you to get back to the bench and you don't go, you should be thrown out! Period.


He can coach, Mizzou is completely lost since he left. But if you say you want to play 40 minutes of hell then milk the clock to single digits on every possession, you deserve every criticism you get.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
What other college sport requires the players to perform a handshake line? Cant think of one. Maybe im wrong though.

I could be wrong because I haven't been to a UK baseball game in a couple of years but they always shook hands. Like you, I'm not sure if soccer does it or any other sport, but they should in my opinion. :)
 

cats#1again

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2011
8,011
4,587
0
This is not the university of Jodie meeks,this is Kentucky lol. Anyone else think of Brilliant Billy?
 

ZaytovenCat

All-American
Apr 25, 2013
24,049
8,812
97
I could be wrong because I haven't been to a UK baseball game in a couple of years but they always shook hands. Like you, I'm not sure if soccer does it or any other sport, but they should in my opinion. :)
Baseball teams shake hands with their teammates and not the other team. Even then it's only the winner.

I totally disagree with you on the handshaking. None of the players in the lines after the game want to shake the other players hands. If they do then it's just because they won and want to smile at them as they pass and rub it in.

I think this whole sportsmanship and respect deal that many people like to push is a fairy tale. I promise that if the handshake was mandatory then the players wouldn't do it unless someone had a personal friend on the other team. The guys are out there wanting to rip the other teams throat out and embarrass them. Respecting them is the last thing on their mind. Imo to think anything otherwise is being naive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sithlyone

MarkPftw

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
5,251
6,782
96
Coach Anderson is a racist just like his old mentor. I feel sorry for the one white guy on the team..lmao..but it's true..he, like Nolan Richardson, is a complete racist..plain and simple.